Mafiascum.net

In post 469, ObsessedWithCats wrote:If yes...

In post 456, ObsessedWithCats wrote:And you still haven't commented on why you hated the votes on me or how Guyett's town-flip affects your reads from the end of D1.

I don't know how long's long enough but I'm not letting this drop and we're 2 days from the deadline.

VOTE: Malakittens

The same applies to notscience regarding any response to any part of the thread ever, but if he's doing something to his meta by being useless on purpose then I feel my time's better spent going after the one who's promised input.

In post 499, Wisdom wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: notscience

lol

and this isn't my meta, this is me being bored of a dead game.

Well. You haven't done a single thing to make it better. You have literally not contributed at all. This entire game. And a major reason it was dead was your slot's absence.

And you promised content.

Which you aren't giving.



Get out.

In post 502, notscience wrote:

In post 499, Wisdom wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: notscience

lol

and this isn't my meta, this is me being bored of a dead game.

Why did you replace in then?

In post 504, Wisdom wrote:

In post 502, notscience wrote:

In post 499, Wisdom wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: notscience

lol

and this isn't my meta, this is me being bored of a dead game.

Why did you replace in then?

Because NS is cool.

In post 455, Smudger wrote:

In post 453, Evil Regals wrote:As for Rach-wagon in Day 1.. She was at L-1 with no competing wagons which suggests to me that scum is ether a) piggybacking that wagon or b) scum is bussing their buddy.
Rach to me looked town Day 1

with regard to a) you read my post then?

as for b) if they were bussing why did Rach not hammer? in fact she actually said so at the time, or is that WIFOM from her?

So which is it a or b? come on don't sit on the fence.

malakittens this is for you then..


notscience are you basically suiciding on us?

I would move my vote but Cats quick move of vote to another ER/malakittens seems opportunistic and Cats is where my vote is right now. So people are we saying lynch Notscience because he is bored?

No, I'm saying lynch notscience because he's actively non-contributory/scummy, his predecessor was non-contributory/scummy, and guy's predecessor never even posted. So basically a scummy playerslot that's admitted (ON BOTH ACTIVE PLAYERS' ACCOUNTS) that they are actively choosing to not provide any content whatsoever.

Saying "this game's soooo inactive" as the reasoning for not being active is the ultimate bullshit. Blatantly not providing content in the face of people demanding content / providing content / actively posting is scummy.

I'm not going to take any excuses.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: mala

Apathy unfortunately happens. I don't think that makes him any less scum, but I still prefer mala.

wisdom, lets talk about mala tomororw...lets do notscience today..

neh Mala is better today

Yeah those who keep telling me to answer questions. I already said I have to reread the thread in order to give them. I don't remember half the shit that happened Day 1. I'm getting to it tonight after work because I need to do something for modding.

AA -- why are you even attempting to 'comprise' with wisdom when you have a town read on me?

In post 514, Malakittens wrote:Yeah those who keep telling me to answer questions. I already said I have to reread the thread in order to give them. I don't remember half the shit that happened Day 1. I'm getting to it tonight after work because I need to do something for modding.

AA -- why are you even attempting to 'comprise' with wisdom when you have a town read on me?

Well I see you as town becuz meta but it also possible that you might be misleading me with meta concept, and moreover wisdom thinks you as scum for his reasons and i can understand his own reasons to see you as scum, i wont push him to change his opinion but i can push him to see the scummy behaviour of notscience

Umm 12 hours left

I'd rather this not end in a NL. I'll selfvote if I have to so we get a lynch.

Then vote mala

In post 518, Wisdom wrote:Then vote mala

No.

Ok, can you vote ns then?

In post 501, ObsessedWithCats wrote:

In post 469, ObsessedWithCats wrote:If yes...

In post 456, ObsessedWithCats wrote:And you still haven't commented on why you hated the votes on me or how Guyett's town-flip affects your reads from the end of D1.

I don't know how long's long enough but I'm not letting this drop and we're 2 days from the deadline.

VOTE: Malakittens

The same applies to notscience regarding any response to any part of the thread ever, but if he's doing something to his meta by being useless on purpose then I feel my time's better spent going after the one who's promised input.

Guyett's town flip makes me sad only because there was a huge level of emotional manilupation in his posts that wasn't there in town games of his. Which is partially a reason why I voted him, but didn't want to let on that I was at the time familiar with most of this player list, but like 1-2 players.

I don't remember why I hated the votes on you. I know one vote by Guyett I hated because it felt like he was avoiding his lynch, but at the same time he gave permission for it and when it was actually happening it looked like scum panic.

Only thing that the Guyett town flip does to my reads is it PoE's to me that there is probably one scum on the wagon and likely one off it. As I said before Rach-slot I'm reading decently as town and I'm also reading AA as town. I know I didn't like IV's posts in D1. So I could see that slot flipping scum. Was hoping ns would actually settle down and produce content, but apparently that shit isn't happening.

Singer is dead and my role PM says I'm town.

Wisdom I had as town D1, but his tunneling on me makes me think town, but not sure.

Which leaves me Ray and you.

I'm pretty sure that we have a town Rach and very confident of a town AA.

In post 520, Wisdom wrote:Ok, can you vote ns then?

So I can quickly put him to L-1 and you can hammer w/o a claim and then put us into possible LyLo tommorow, no.

I'm expecting you to totally quick hammer at this point.

How many times have you seen me quickhammering?

And anyway, do you prefer a no-lynch?