Mafiascum.net

In post 86, Voidedmafia wrote:I don't recall, but that doesn't make him scum.

I liked this.

In post 86, Voidedmafia wrote:The day will end when the day will end. We can start worrying when it gets to be near 10 days, if you're that worried about it. Rushing lynching just for the sake of money won't get us anywhere.

I liked this a lot.

In post 156, Voidedmafia wrote:Your misrepresentation of my post is cute, though. (unless it's not at me, but still.)

I liked this.

In post 267, Voidedmafia wrote:This kind of self-boasting never rubs me the right way.

I liked this.

In post 267, Voidedmafia wrote:A.) I'm busy doing more than just this game. Don't worry your little butts.

I liked this.

In post 278, Voidedmafia wrote:P-EDIT: Please. On that note, Cabd and Ffery, stop boosting each other in-thread.

I liked this.

With 21 alive, it takes 11 to lynch.

Lord Mhork (5): BBmolla, uʍop ǝpısdn, Zdenek, Garuda, Harakiri
VoidedMafia (4): morph the cat, zMuffinMan, Klick, 1baldeagle1
Lost Butterfly (3): Pyrotechnics, ProHawk, Lord Mhorkle1
Harakiri (2): Nero Cain, VoidedMafia
BBmolla (1): Lost Butterfly

Not Voting (6): PeregrineV, Seanald, guille2015, Banakai, Hermy, DoctorPepper

New deadline as of 452 is Wednesday, October 16th at 11:30am EST (site time).
Countdown to deadline:

I'm reassured, mostly. Still need a response re: discrediting.

In post 502, Garuda wrote:I'm reassured, mostly. Still need a response re: discrediting.

I'm not really sure how else to characterize or respond to this:

In post 184, ProHawk wrote:

In post 181, morph the cat wrote: I think you know that I at least am not super-quick to put a vote down on day 1. I'm less inclined to when a thread is moving as quickly as this one.

I do realize this is you playing to your meta, yes. Still worries me.

I "play to my meta" because of my philosophy and approach to the game. Dismissing my tendencies and reasons to hold my vote and stew on my reads as "playing to my meta" appears to me to be pretty much intentionally focusing on the trees and ignoring the forest.

Garuda wrote:We also lost the bid for neighborizer.

Why did you and Empire decide to claim to have lost it now?

We got Investigation Immune! I can't believe it was so cheap. We even bid $80 on it to keep it out of scum's hands.

Why didn't you go for Neighborizer?

I take it you read ahead by now?

I liked Molla being aggressive with Mina early.

My read is pending on how he answers a few things, but what I don't like is that he dropped it really quickly and hopped onto Mhork. I know he was calling Mhork a member of the other scumteam, but the way the vote change went down read as though Faraday sweet-talked him onto the wagon. Even if he did really suspect Mhork, I'd have expected more resistance to being charmed by his other top scumread.

Also, I'm not sure what reaction he was expecting from me as either alignment (he should know I don't fold easily to stuff like that as scum). And, if anything, my frame of mind when I wrote the post he called nervous was completely relaxed; I knew everything would be cleared up once I claimed, and I'm used to drawing early wagons that dissipate quickly because of my wacky early-D1 scumhunting style.

Also also, his last two posts struck me as fluffy, and not in a bumbling spontaneous BBmolla town way ("Omigod, there was a traitor who's immune to cops...in a completely different set-up! Never mind that there's no indication any of the Marketplace games had a traitor. This is a useful contribution to the strategy discussion.")

In post 503, morph the cat wrote:I "play to my meta" because of my philosophy and approach to the game. Dismissing my tendencies and reasons to hold my vote and stew on my reads as "playing to my meta" appears to me to be pretty much intentionally focusing on the trees and ignoring the forest.

I can see why it bothered him.

In post 505, Garuda wrote:

In post 503, morph the cat wrote:I "play to my meta" because of my philosophy and approach to the game. Dismissing my tendencies and reasons to hold my vote and stew on my reads as "playing to my meta" appears to me to be pretty much intentionally focusing on the trees and ignoring the forest.

I can see why it bothered him.

Then please explain so I can maybe dismiss the niggle.

In post 504, Lost Butterfly wrote:Why did you and Empire decide to claim to have lost it now?

I decided to without really deciding to.

In post 504, Lost Butterfly wrote:I take it you read ahead by now?

Yep!

In post 504, Lost Butterfly wrote:Also, I'm not sure what reaction he was expecting from me as either alignment (he should know I don't fold easily to stuff like that as scum). And, if anything, my frame of mind when I wrote the post he called nervous was completely relaxed; I knew everything would be cleared up once I claimed, and I'm used to drawing early wagons that dissipate quickly because of my wacky early-D1 scumhunting style.

Sometimes molla bullshit pushes people without an end result in mind.

In post 506, morph the cat wrote:

In post 505, Garuda wrote:

In post 503, morph the cat wrote:I "play to my meta" because of my philosophy and approach to the game. Dismissing my tendencies and reasons to hold my vote and stew on my reads as "playing to my meta" appears to me to be pretty much intentionally focusing on the trees and ignoring the forest.

I can see why it bothered him.

Then please explain so I can maybe dismiss the niggle.

It seemed strange that you two hadn't voted when it seemed pretty clear you synced up and both agreed that Voided was scum. I know you have a meta of holding onto your votes a bit, but Cabd doesn't, so not voting when you were synced up and ready to vote looks like playing to your meta.

Molla wasn't as cool as I thought he was.

In post 500, Garuda wrote:

In post 86, Voidedmafia wrote:I don't recall, but that doesn't make him scum.

I liked this.

In post 86, Voidedmafia wrote:The day will end when the day will end. We can start worrying when it gets to be near 10 days, if you're that worried about it. Rushing lynching just for the sake of money won't get us anywhere.

I liked this a lot.

In post 156, Voidedmafia wrote:Your misrepresentation of my post is cute, though. (unless it's not at me, but still.)

I liked this.

In post 267, Voidedmafia wrote:This kind of self-boasting never rubs me the right way.

I liked this.

In post 267, Voidedmafia wrote:A.) I'm busy doing more than just this game. Don't worry your little butts.

I liked this.

In post 278, Voidedmafia wrote:P-EDIT: Please. On that note, Cabd and Ffery, stop boosting each other in-thread.

I liked this.

Explain.

But it does seem odd that he would attack you and Faraday in such a strange way as scum.

Pedit: I liked those posts.

In post 508, Garuda wrote:

In post 506, morph the cat wrote:

In post 505, Garuda wrote:

In post 503, morph the cat wrote:I "play to my meta" because of my philosophy and approach to the game. Dismissing my tendencies and reasons to hold my vote and stew on my reads as "playing to my meta" appears to me to be pretty much intentionally focusing on the trees and ignoring the forest.

I can see why it bothered him.

Then please explain so I can maybe dismiss the niggle.

It seemed strange that you two hadn't voted when it seemed pretty clear you synced up and both agreed that Voided was scum. I know you have a meta of holding onto your votes a bit, but Cabd doesn't, so not voting when you were synced up and ready to vote looks like playing to your meta.

Then nearly every game we've played together must seem strange.

Oh wait. That's playing to my meta, isn't it.

Yep.

Sync achieved.

In post 494, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Voided ignored my question about his so called townread on LB

lolwhat?

You asked, I answered. Don't get pissy because you can't fucking read.

In post 516, fferyllt wrote:

UNVOTE

Damnit

In post 458, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Lol, whoever did that is probably scum. Which sucks, because we still have a few people who haven't post at all. But, the good advantage is, we get waaaaaay more money, so scum is practically giving us money.

I didn't advertise on N0. What we really need, is people to start talking.

P-Edit: So LB is town because I'm pushing for his lynch? I think he's scummy. Yeah, I don't like that read for calling him town.

I can't read, huh? I want you to respond to this.

Garuada, what's that vote for?

posting here before I get prodded

will read and post tommorow

In post 498, Harakiri wrote:Like Mhurk Wagon, don't like Voided wagon. Mainly focused on sorting Cabd/ffery, Nacho/Empire, and Zmuffin right now.

I'm half paying attention to the thread--letting Sakura handle it until Pokemon Fever dies down.

Whatever happened to your suspicions of us (and baldeagle and Voidedmafia)? Also, why are you AVOIDING MY QUESTIONS here:

In post 197, Harakiri wrote:

In post 195, Lost Butterfly wrote:Wow, this is pretty scummy.

How?

In post 207, Harakiri wrote:

In post 204, Lost Butterfly wrote:You should probably vote me for avoiding your questions, tammy

You're avoiding my question too you know

Unvote
Vote: Butterfly

In post 271, Lost Butterfly wrote:Um...ignore my last post of random quotes, please. I hit submit accidentally before commenting on the quotes. And the baldeagle ones were on my clipboard from before. My point was basically that this is a terrible, horrible reason for a vote. Also, your scum reads (baldeagle, Voidedmafia, Lost Butterfly) all line up perfectly with the people who were getting heat, whereas I think town would be prone to falling into a camp. Care to elaborate on why bald-Voided-LB are your scumreads? Or why Pyro and Muffin are town? Your list feels cribbed from everyone else's.

Garuda, do you think it's possible whomever put money towards medium was scum trying to flood the market with useless junk?

To lost butterfly, I enjoyed the post from pyro regarding the fact you would go for the whole hundred of you were actually purchasing to keep it out of scum hands. That inconsistency made sense to me.

Hi LostButterfly!

Read context clues better to figure out how to read this hydra's head!

Here's a secret: only one of us two is actively playing Pokemon right now.

morph wrote:Cabd isn't around, but he and I discussed prohawk earlier.

We feel like he's kinda avoiding the thread atm. And we didn't like that his major contribution to the game last night was a pretty much gratuitous injection of morph-fery meta wifom.

Your thinking he seems town is making me feel a little squinty-eyed.

not directed at me, but i liked prohawk's entrance in the game, mostly because his thoughts were in line with mine about LB and baldeagle (this was before either wagon really had a following, iirc). the attack on baldeagle for the quote tag stuff is the only thing that i didn't particularly like about prohawk.

harakiri wrote:Like Mhurk Wagon, don't like Voided wagon. Mainly focused on sorting Cabd/ffery, Nacho/Empire, and Zmuffin right now.

guessing this is the nati head. why do you like the mhork wagon and why don't you like the voided wagon?


@Garuda,

i'm null on like all of those quotes. i don't see town tone in any of them and they're all pretty alignment-neutral posts. why did you like them?


@LB,

why did you originally think mhork was scum? prior to his reactions to your vote. i went over your ISO to look for the reason but couldn't actually find one.

morph wrote:

UNVOTE

why?

who are you currently thinking about voting?

mhork wrote:Garuda, do you think it's possible whomever put money towards medium was scum trying to flood the market with useless junk?

zdenek advertised medium, didn't he? do you think he's scum?

In post 518, 1baldeagle1 wrote:

In post 458, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Lol, whoever did that is probably scum. Which sucks, because we still have a few people who haven't post at all. But, the good advantage is, we get waaaaaay more money, so scum is practically giving us money.

I didn't advertise on N0. What we really need, is people to start talking.

P-Edit: So LB is town because I'm pushing for his lynch? I think he's scummy. Yeah, I don't like that read for calling him town.

I can't read, huh? I want you to respond to this.

Garuada, what's that vote for?

Still can't fucking read because you still ignore what ELSE I've already said.

For crying out loud.

In post 522, Harakiri wrote:Here's a secret: only one of us two is actively playing Pokemon right now.

What the hell does that have to do with the price of tea in china?

In post 498, Harakiri wrote:don't like Voided wagon.

Then why were you voting me?