Page 21 of 267

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:10 pm
by Rogue
That was implied

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:10 pm
by Titus
Majiffy wrote:
borkjerfkin wrote:maybe put up the towniest player in your own hood.

Better

Titus answer my q


Post number? This is going a little fast.

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:11 pm
by Toogeloo
@Titus
I was referring to the fact that lynching two scum from the same neighborhood (with minimal casualties to the whole neighborhood) would be a monumental achievement. I know that (and assume) one or more Neighborhoods probably have 2 scum, but not more than that, but I'm more concerned that we will turn hunting scum out in Neighborhoods as more of a witch hunt, which will in turn be damaging to those Neighborhoods that have no scum at all.

Gone again for a bit, that wall took me longer than I wanted, and I got a few more things to do tonight. I'll be back in a few hours.

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:11 pm
by Brian Skies
Rogue wrote:I kinda want a Titus lynch too, but ns is town reading her so that's not gonna happen.

~Rogue

I'd complain about this, but I did like the reasoning Notty provided for townreading Titus.

Nero Cain wrote:Who the fuck argues about being townread?

Me, because scumfucks like Majiffy WK me when they have no reason to. And I almost never make it above probtown in my games.

Rogue wrote:I'm not considering brian for days regardless

Why?

And I find that hard to believe with Mala in your hydra.

borkjerfkin wrote:
Brian Skies wrote:Our ability is powerful, but I feel I offered alternatives to your policy lynch before conceding to your efforts. The only reason I even conceded is because your plan is timelier than mine was, and it it's a good way to get some of the objectives out of the way so we don't have to worry about them later.


I guess I didn't feel that you were planning so much as just musing.

I was seriously discussing with you over it because I was trying to figure out why you were okay with policy lynching when I offered alternatives on Page 1. I didn't like the idea of wasting Day 1 on a policy lynch. But to me, your motives seemed to basically boil down to "get sensor right away" and "knock out objectives so we don't have to deal with them later."

Rogue wrote:brian why are you only quoting people in your hood

Because my neighborhood had 5 pages of pre-game content and it's easier to pay attention to players I've already interacted with.

Majiffy wrote:But Titus is careful and would always read OPs.
Therefore Titus must be scum

I remember seeing a similar argument in one of my games before. But I can't for the life of me remember which one it was and how it turned out.

RubikAshtray wrote:Seriously, I love the idea about playing with you, guys, but I feel alienated as fuck

Some people carry more weight with their words based on reputation.

/16 >:(

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:11 pm
by Titus
Majiffy wrote:Nah using 2 as a bg gives scum 75% to fuck towns townreads with no repercussions.

Also titus are you townreading me? Simple yes or no


Yes.

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:11 pm
by Majiffy
Are you townreading me simple yes or no

Titus titus fucking pedits

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:12 pm
by borkjerfkin
Majiffy wrote:Fapping


Image

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:12 pm
by Rogue
Brian Skies wrote:Why?


So I can use bop

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:12 pm
by Macaronis and Cheese
Titus wrote:
Macaronis and Cheese wrote:Macaronis has a good idea. It seems like our neighborhood's power sucks in comparison to other neighborhoods' powers, so I'm fine letting others take it. Also, Titus, you really need to be careful with your tunneling of Venmar. You have a tendency to put on your blinders.

-Cheese


I do have a tendancy to put on blinders, but I'm not willing to be anti-town to keep my blinders. Venmar is scum. It's fucking obvious all his posts further a scum objective. No scumhunting. He omgussed me. So yeah, I'll scumread him until he actually does something townie before he's a derping doodoo head which doesn't make sense for Venmar. If you don't want me to keep talking about Venmar, here's an idea, quit asking me about Venmar. I'll tell you if I quit scumreading him and I'll make an effort to highlight a decent post he makes (supposing he ever makes one).

K. Just keep your eyes out for other potential targets. It's comforting, at least, that you're not a vigilante. Thoughts on Clusk92? He was apart of that whole RVS nonsense with Venmar. I suppose I wouldn't mind hearing more thoughts across the board about Clusk. Seems like he should be pinging on people's scumdars to some extent, since he RV'd then peaced.

-Cheese

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:12 pm
by Nero Cain
I think Titus is p scummy. The Venmar thing she was pushing makes more sense from scum then from town. I think eek is a cw to scum titus. I don't like how Jiffy was pushing eek that Titus was saying/doing. I don't like Titus sheeping said logic from eek yet still calling him scum. I don't like MS saying that he wanted to pl just to get the objective but actually cares who got pled.

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:13 pm
by borkjerfkin
Brian Skies wrote:I was seriously discussing with you over it because I was trying to figure out why you were okay with policy lynching when I offered alternatives on Page 1. I didn't like the idea of wasting Day 1 on a policy lynch. But to me, your motives seemed to basically boil down to "get sensor right away" and "knock out objectives so we don't have to deal with them later."


That's an accurate portrayal.

Anyway your catchup is making me think I took a wrong turn; you're already not interacting with me like you did in x-roads.

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:13 pm
by Titus
Yup, I did read the OP. I suggested that Bork not townread me solely because I gave Cabd a read in our hood (said he lacked posting) and asked what the tasks were. I wanted to see who was using valid reasons for townreads. I did read the posts.

Yeah I'm townreading you Jiffy.

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:13 pm
by Macaronis and Cheese
GODDAMN I HAD TO HIT THE SUBMIT BUTTON LIKE FIFTEEN TIMES.

*gains composure* Apologies. Carry on.

-Cheese

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:13 pm
by Majiffy
Titus wrote:
Majiffy wrote:Nah using 2 as a bg gives scum 75% to fuck towns townreads with no repercussions.

Also titus are you townreading me? Simple yes or no


Yes.

Then drop venmar scumread. I have strong current meta venmar is town

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:14 pm
by Majiffy
Also toog townread

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:14 pm
by Rogue
Majiffy wrote:Also toog townread


welcome to the party

a bit late

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:14 pm
by Venmar
This feels like Titus's play from UDesign.

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:14 pm
by borkjerfkin
Macaronis and Cheese wrote:K. Just keep your eyes out for other potential targets. It's comforting, at least, that you're not a vigilante. Thoughts on Clusk92? He was apart of that whole RVS nonsense with Venmar. I suppose I wouldn't mind hearing more thoughts across the board about Clusk. Seems like he should be pinging on people's scumdars to some extent, since he RV'd then peaced.


Clusk isn't on the table today due to which neighborhood he's in.

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:14 pm
by Titus
Majiffy, I have strong scum meta that Venmar is scum. So yeah, I townread you but I don't chart. That's doubly so when I kicked your chart's ass in House Party. That being said, link me to the game of Venmars please.

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:15 pm
by borkjerfkin
Can you guys both link some scum meta parallels that you're drawing from?

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:15 pm
by borkjerfkin
Cause fuck armchair meta.

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:15 pm
by Venmar
Seriously, you don't understand my meta, please stop.

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:15 pm
by Macaronis and Cheese
borkjerfkin wrote:
Macaronis and Cheese wrote:K. Just keep your eyes out for other potential targets. It's comforting, at least, that you're not a vigilante. Thoughts on Clusk92? He was apart of that whole RVS nonsense with Venmar. I suppose I wouldn't mind hearing more thoughts across the board about Clusk. Seems like he should be pinging on people's scumdars to some extent, since he RV'd then peaced.


Clusk isn't on the table today due to which neighborhood he's in.

That's fair. I suppose I want to hear Titus' thoughts, then.

-Cheese

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:16 pm
by Titus
Venmar wrote:This feels like Titus's play from UDesign.


Oh wow... another post ignoring the rest of the thread and calling me scum baselessly....

In UDesign, pratically every mislynch was a policy lynch... what am I arguing against, policy lynching. Just shut up scum.

Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:16 pm
by Majiffy
Rogue wrote:
Majiffy wrote:Also toog townread


welcome to the party

a bit late

Life is hard on a phone with 10 posts a min