Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:26 pm
Someone should hammer q.q
↑ hi im Yakko wrote:@Nos are you saying titus was accidentally right?
Discredit much?
You may not get my logic but I am on fire lately.
Page 21 of 43
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:30 pm
Discredit much?
You may not get my logic but I am on fire lately.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:32 pm
Yes. Good for you Titus.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:35 pm
Might want to call in the fire brigade for that↑ Titus wrote:↑ hi im Yakko wrote:@Nos are you saying titus was accidentally right?
Discredit much?
You may not get my logic but I am on fire lately.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:38 pm
Soren, Marry me.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:39 pm
↑ hi im Yakko wrote:@Nos are you saying titus was accidentally right?
no, I just didn't see his reasoning behind his scum read. Not that I think it's wrong, I just didn't comprehend it.
@Titus
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:40 pm
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:42 pm
So can mod modkill him for playing against his wincon and not selfvoting?
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:43 pm
↑ Titus wrote:↑ hi im Yakko wrote:@Nos are you saying titus was accidentally right?
Discredit much?
You may not get my logic but I am on fire lately.
Say whut. Talk to Nos man.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:44 pm
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:44 pm
I'm not scum though.
I just wanted to provide an alignment indicative reaction test before I bite the dust. I would've left a pretty shitty mislynch wagon behind otherwise. Not even a counter just plain reasonless crapvotes.
Interpret it as you see fit, I'm off to bed. Titus you suck or are scum.
I just wanted to provide an alignment indicative reaction test before I bite the dust. I would've left a pretty shitty mislynch wagon behind otherwise. Not even a counter just plain reasonless crapvotes.
Interpret it as you see fit, I'm off to bed. Titus you suck or are scum.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:47 pm
↑ LoHa wrote:I'm not scum though.
I just wanted to provide an alignment indicative reaction test before I bite the dust. I would've left a pretty shitty mislynch wagon behind otherwise. Not even a counter just plain reasonless crapvotes.
Interpret it as you see fit, I'm off to bed. Titus you suck or are scum.
Here is a deal for you. Tell me in great detail why Titus is scum and I will retract my vote. Paragraph form, no logical fallacy.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:48 pm
Lmao oh man. He salty.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:54 pm
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:54 pm
↑ hi im Yakko wrote:Lmao oh man. He salty.
Do you think I will get the essay? Should I grade it for accuracy?
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 2:05 pm
wrt Titus: broken clock is right twice a day, I suppose.
I can hammer, anyone got anything else to say?
I can hammer, anyone got anything else to say?
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 2:06 pm
LMAO ok I missed #510.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 2:09 pm
So we're just hammering at this point yes? I see nothing useful from LoHa.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 2:10 pm
Omg these scum pansies.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 2:11 pm
hammer him
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 2:11 pm
@LoHa
: From one Teamliquid expatriate to another... this forum operates much less on ego-boosting and shit-flinging arguments. (Mostly.) Getting a feel for the different meta here is very important. (Same goes for Lhix on that score, actually.)And yes Titus, your read is being "discredited" because, quite simply, it is worth no credit. Right or wrong, it was terrible.
To repeat myself again: agreeing with you that not much has happened in the thread is NOT a reason he should townread you. Scum frequently make accurate statements.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 2:12 pm
No. I'm not hammering yet. Not done talking.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 2:14 pm
For one thing, all of you seem to REALLY BADLY want this day over with. I'm not comfortable with that.
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 2:16 pm
↑ Aquanim wrote:@LoHa: From one Teamliquid expatriate to another... this forum operates much less on ego-boosting and shit-flinging arguments. (Mostly.) Getting a feel for the different meta here is very important. (Same goes for Lhix on that score, actually.)
And yes Titus, your read is being "discredited" because, quite simply, it is worth no credit. Right or wrong, it was terrible.
To repeat myself again: agreeing with you that not much has happened in the thread is NOT a reason he should townread you. Scum frequently make accurate statements.
I do have a question on this. I dont think I am necessarily shit flinging around arguments, but besides the arguing or trying to make a case what would you suggest? On the Meta I came from it was very much based in empiricism and observation. While I have noticed the shift here in both tone and play style, I have noticed that challenging is equally detrimental. Would you say that is correct?
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 2:17 pm
I'm not that worried about getting the day over with, but I don't think we have the votes for an alternate wagon and we're not really getting anything useful in the interim.