Mafiascum.net

In post 419, Manuel87 wrote:

In post 398, Morning Tweet wrote:

Great, I impulse wrote that I never incited suspicion on him, yet it seems I have.
I wrote 1-2 posts suggesting I scumread/want to pressure WCS, however I do not vote him. Fucking hang me.

Yes thats exactly what i am saying you throw shade at him without actually mentioning a scumread or voting him.

And I'm going to keep saying that's reachy.

In post 398, Morning Tweet wrote:

That'd be a great reason to accuse me of trying to earn towncred if there wasn't a valid reason to say that as town.
Seeing as there was, moving on..

The WCS lynch was pretty likely at this point and you didnt really give any reasons for Thatsit to change his mind.
You asked for a reason why scum would say what you said and i gave one.

Yes, that is nice but it doesn't contribute as a reason to scumread me.

In post 398, Morning Tweet wrote:

Because no one scumreads Accountant and Transcend, obviously..
Norsa has enough townreads to not be on the bottom, imo. You can dispute that, but honestly wcs is solidifying Nor's safety for today with his crazy scumread on him.

Norsak is scumread by WCS and Null at best by others. Also why does it matter to you what reads other players have? You should decide for yourself who is the most scummy.
Your only scumread this game was Charloux and you suddenly dropped that when the pressure on him faded.

Didn't I tell you in one of these replies that I suspected Charloux

and

WCS? More recently, though, I suspect Misa, Accountant, and yourself. You don't seem to care because I wrote you all as null in my read list. That's PoE!

In post 398, Morning Tweet wrote:

Uh, not sure what that is supposed to mean.
As scum you're not going to read one of my posts and be all like "Wow, she's trying to deceive people into voting for WCS without getting any blood on her hands". You'll be thinking about arguing that's what I did.

Ok fair point.

In post 398, Morning Tweet wrote:

Kinda pointless seeing as there was no reason to defend him at that point, but I guess I could have mentioned it.

If you had mentioned it maybe we would have avoided Charloux claim so sharing the information would have helped town.
Maybe you didnt want to get attention by defending Charloux?

Nope! Charloux claimed at around L-3. Not even remotely my fault, how would I have known he'd do that? That's also assuming others would unvote due to his meta.

I will say out of your bsing about my readlist, me not voting WCS, etc., this is the best you have. I kinda wish I did mention it, but I highly doubt people would have unvoted because "Oh, he always acts scummy? My b."

In post 405, Morning Tweet wrote:@Accountant, What lynch looks better and is easier to push than mine?
WCS and Char are untouchable.
General consensus says you and Transcend are town.
Norska may be relatively easy but would look opportunistic due to WCS.
Misa and thatsit don't post often enough imo.

Not trying to say I'm weak, but why would scum!Manuel not gun for me but town!Manuel would?

You are misreping. You were townread quite a bit before i made my case against you.
Your slot is considered scum because of my case.

That is not how I remember it, I'll read again tho.

Lmao at "Your slot is considered scum because of my case.", I'm going to assume you miswrote that and meant "Your slot is considered for scum". You only got WCS on board, and I proved he wasn't even reading my posts!