Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 4:27 am
I think you overestimate some people's abilities
How is that an overestimation? Is it really too much to think that someone can have a consistent, naturally progressing read?In post 500, dramonic wrote:I think you overestimate some people's abilities
This is what I got out of it as well.In post 497, dramonic wrote:I see less "caught for the reason" and more "you guys are idiots for scumreading me because I'm town and therefore cannot be scummy"
Well I’m not gonna deny that.In post 504, dramonic wrote:Man you are gonna be really disappointed with people.
Not everyone is like that, but players like Gustavo are clearly [REDACTED]
Actually yeah I do want to know, which was why i brought it up. The post was apparently enough for two people to declare it the first "GoodPost" of the game AND to get a town read off of it, but at the time I rolled my eyes at it. I want to know your thought process.In post 348, the worst wrote:Fwiw this was about when I decided Inferno was an early townread. I don't really think you're interested in why I found the post noteworthy though? Like let me know if you're after something here.In post 232, Elbirn wrote:@Both of you, What made that post notable or good when it was nothing? Like it's really self serving for Rasko to like it so lul
Disclaimer I don't know Dram hardly at all but can confirm that my impression of him from speakeasy has been the opposite of chill and seeing all these xD smiles faces and such is like being winked at by LuciferIn post 485, dramonic wrote:Those tags lead to your own post and the OP, so I'm assumin you screwed up something in thereIn post 475, brassherald wrote:Re 184, I'm not going to say I have a great explanation, but dramonic's posts just feel like scum posting. It's pure gut, and no real evidence, yeah, but, like everything feels like he's too calculated, I guess would be the right phrase, to be town.
I also don't think 482 is a town post, but, again, I can't quite put my finger on why.
My dramonic read is purely instinct, and I cannot read his posts and tell my stupid instinct with my brain that it's being stupid.
Also I might come off as calculated because I have to actually think about how I post. My normal posting style is not chill at all. XD
Boy you do not get to jump on a flash wagon for no reason while also shading me. Tell the class why I'm a scummy scum buttIn post 489, Inferno390 wrote: But someone else I’ve been stuck on is Elbirn. I keep rereading his ISO and thee is something really odd about his posting. I can’t figure out what though.
VOTE: Skygazer
They're not the only one. Why skygazer over Ausuka?In post 493, Inferno390 wrote:Well Skygazer has an effectively naked ISO.In post 490, Flubbernugget wrote:The majority of the votes in this game have had words around them but are effectively naked votes
Not really sure what else to say about it.
It means this game is likely a town loss.In post 496, davesaz wrote:That's a nice observation but what does it mean to you?In post 490, Flubbernugget wrote:The majority of the votes in this game have had words around them but are effectively naked votes
But then what does this even mean? If feeling like I'm "off" doesnt mean that you feel like I'm scummy then what even do you intend to convey mate?In post 511, Inferno390 wrote:@Elbirn: I never said you were scummy. I just said your ISO was off and I didn’t know why.
464 and the fact that you are asking me which I think has substance instead of trying to point out actual substance or make a post of substance. Well, not winning you any town points, here.In post 521, Skygazer wrote:@brass: Which post of mine is the one with substance in your opinion? I can't tell looking at my iso.
I think postcount:content ratio can be a nice metric... Like, even if you have many posts half of them may be not useful at all (Ducky is guilty, but I love his fluffposting still) and even if you have a wallpost every 24 hours (hello there, me in part of my games) that can be townie...In post 478, MagnaofIllusion wrote:@Inferno- In regards to 449 I understand your point of view but I have a strong opinion that post count has absolutely nothing to do with content provided. Heck I would argue that I have more readable and parseable content than several of the top 5 posters in this game despite not having a high post count. I don't think it is automatically anti-Town to be a hyper poster as long as you
A. understand that page count can be an anti-Town barrier just as much if not moreso than the wall-posting
B. there is nothing inherently wrong with someone only posting 3 to 5 times in a 24 hour period as long as said posts have readable content.
So when you called out all players under 20 posts as needing to provide content you appeared to be using an arbitrary post count threshold instead of a content threshold. Which I found problematic.
I likeIn post 479, HitAlt wrote:Dave+SkyGazer+chick.
Please don't N1 kill me so that I can see you all hang.
VOTE: SkyGazer first?
That can be the issue exactlyIn post 481, brassherald wrote:Why SkyGazer as a first pick? I feel weird about the one slot I can't remember any of the posts from at this point but I'm not sure it is sufficient for me to support lynching that slot
I honestly think that part of Gus' thought process is Profii must misunderstand me --> misrep --> scum :/In post 499, Inferno390 wrote:See, what really bothers me in hindsight was the fact that Gustavo started acumreading Profii by saying he didn’t like his stances on no lynch, and then came back about 200 posts later and said that Profii’s stance on No Lynch had nothing to do with the read. The fact that when I pointed out there wasn’t even an attempt to defend the point doesn’t help either, but that’s a pretty big discrepancy that I’m having trouble moving past.
In post 514, Skygazer wrote:These generic scum reads on me makes it hard for me to even discus why yall are wrong.
Well you can try noIn post 515, Skygazer wrote:In any case I don't see why people are lumping me in with dave and chickadee.