Page 21 of 337

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:00 am
by Lady Angel
How are people getting items on day 1 in a game with daystart? That's the weird part to me about Chickadee's role.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:02 am
by Invisibility
why

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:03 am
by Nero Cain
a day insert role that sends things is not some impossibility.

Is that your total catchup?

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:06 am
by Chickadee
I can send things as often as I want to as many players as I want. But there’s another layer to it as well. So you may or may not like getting something from me.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:09 am
by Nero Cain
Friendly Neighbor by day, Serial killer by night.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:37 am
by Chickadee
In post 504, Nero Cain wrote:Friendly Neighbor by day, Serial killer by night.
False on both accounts

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:39 am
by Nero Cain
Wasn't trying to guess your role, was just trying to be funny.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:43 am
by Nosferatu
In post 488, Rylai and Lina wrote:obviously ~Sora
pause

first off

who is sora if the hydra is specifically rylai and lina??

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:49 am
by jjh927
In post 73, Rylai and Lina wrote:So for all purposes Rylai = Frozen Angel = Sora

and Lina = Shiro = Shiro

~Sora

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:49 am
by jjh927
Play

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:50 am
by Invisibility
In post 505, Chickadee wrote:
In post 504, Nero Cain wrote:Friendly Neighbor by day, Serial killer by night.
False on both accounts
ew

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:38 am
by Innocent Children
In post 484, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 475, Innocent Children wrote:P.edit. That’s why I’m thinking that she is extremely unlikely to be linked with anyone she sent PMs to.
I think it is probably town indicative, though mildly dismaying, that ICs is revealing the contents of the message now
I haven’t really though, however I think it likely to be some type of crumb.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:40 am
by Innocent Children
In post 485, Chickadee wrote:
In post 463, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 454, Chickadee wrote:and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch
but being lynchbait doesn't mean you can't roll scum.

Pork, its whats prodging today.
True, but you can't really look at how easily people piled on my wagon, with no explanations, and think "Yep this is the time Chick rolls scum"
In post 466, Innocent Children wrote:
In post 454, Chickadee wrote:Vax, I'm thunking you rolled scum here.


Also pretty much everyone (save for a few) have played with me, and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch. Unless you guys are going to provide actual reasons, votes off me please.
Chick, why is your RVS vote still on me? I should ask Lady Angel the same thing. Lol
Because I never bothered to take it off.

UNVOTE:

Why does it bother you? You were nowhere near lynch.

If you're asking specifically why I'm not voting tax instead, I'd like to interact with him a bit.
Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:43 am
by Innocent Children
In post 489, Ginngie wrote:I got Barbie girl from chick

Don’t really understand why that means anything
Interesting, perhaps her gifts correlate with trust levels? Mine was a lot more helpful.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:46 am
by Innocent Children
In post 499, jjh927 wrote:I don't understand why anyone would think a good shot would be possible at this stage of the game anyway ngl
I agree. I also think it’s a bad idea to alignment - particularly scumlock anyone on D1.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:50 am
by Innocent Children
In post 503, Chickadee wrote:I can send things as often as I want to as many players as I want.
But there’s another layer to it as well. So you may or may not like getting something from me.
Interesting. I guess that should become more and more obvious as more and more people receive “gifts” from you, I guess.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:52 am
by Chickadee
In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.
No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 12:01 pm
by Innocent Children
In post 516, Chickadee wrote:
In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.
No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.
I’m always curious about ANY votes on me. However, leaving an RVS on someone close to deadline could possibly mean something. I make it a rule, to never ignore votes on me and I still waiting on Lady Angel’s response to that.

Curiositity does not necessarily = being concerned.

Speaking of, Nero’s point about Vax not having much of a reaction to votes, is making me wonder about that too. Your take?

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 12:06 pm
by Innocent Children
In post 515, Innocent Children wrote:
In post 503, Chickadee wrote:I can send things as often as I want to as many players as I want.
But there’s another layer to it as well. So you may or may not like getting something from me.
Interesting. I guess that should become more and more obvious as more and more people receive “gifts” from you, I guess.
In post 513, Innocent Children wrote:
In post 489, Ginngie wrote:I got Barbie girl from chick

Don’t really understand why that means anything
Interesting, perhaps her gifts correlate with trust levels? Mine was a lot more helpful.
I’m not sure as to why someone would or wouldn’t like your gift. Would that be more likely to be intentional on your part or more open to interpretation on the part of the recipient?

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 12:07 pm
by Nosferatu
how many people are on vax rn

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 1:04 pm
by Ginngie
In post 517, Innocent Children wrote:
In post 516, Chickadee wrote:
In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.
No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.
I’m always curious about ANY votes on me. However, leaving an RVS on someone close to deadline could possibly mean something. I make it a rule, to never ignore votes on me and I still waiting on Lady Angel’s response to that.

Curiositity does not necessarily = being concerned.

Speaking of, Nero’s point about Vax not having much of a reaction to votes, is making me wonder about that too. Your take?
innocent children

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 1:04 pm
by Ginngie
VOTE: innocent children even

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 1:59 pm
by Innocent Children
In post 521, Ginngie wrote:VOTE: innocent children even
Why?

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 2:04 pm
by Innocent Children
In post 520, Ginngie wrote:
In post 517, Innocent Children wrote:
In post 516, Chickadee wrote:
In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.
No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.
I’m always curious about ANY votes on me. However, leaving an RVS on someone close to deadline could possibly mean something. I make it a rule, to never ignore votes on me and I still waiting on Lady Angel’s response to that.

Curiositity does not necessarily = being concerned.

Speaking of, Nero’s point about Vax not having much of a reaction to votes, is making me wonder about that too. Your take?
innocent children
In post 521, Ginngie wrote:VOTE: innocent children even
In post 522, Innocent Children wrote:
In post 521, Ginngie wrote:VOTE: innocent children even
Why?
Not a valid answer. :shifty:

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 2:39 pm
by RadiantCowbells
annie