Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 10:00 am
How are people getting items on day 1 in a game with daystart? That's the weird part to me about Chickadee's role.
False on both accountsIn post 504, Nero Cain wrote:Friendly Neighbor by day, Serial killer by night.
pauseIn post 488, Rylai and Lina wrote:obviously ~Sora
In post 73, Rylai and Lina wrote:So for all purposes Rylai = Frozen Angel = Sora
and Lina = Shiro = Shiro
~Sora
ewIn post 505, Chickadee wrote:False on both accountsIn post 504, Nero Cain wrote:Friendly Neighbor by day, Serial killer by night.
I haven’t really though, however I think it likely to be some type of crumb.In post 484, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think it is probably town indicative, though mildly dismaying, that ICs is revealing the contents of the message nowIn post 475, Innocent Children wrote:P.edit. That’s why I’m thinking that she is extremely unlikely to be linked with anyone she sent PMs to.
Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.In post 485, Chickadee wrote:True, but you can't really look at how easily people piled on my wagon, with no explanations, and think "Yep this is the time Chick rolls scum"In post 463, Nero Cain wrote:but being lynchbait doesn't mean you can't roll scum.In post 454, Chickadee wrote:and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch
Pork, its whats prodging today.Because I never bothered to take it off.In post 466, Innocent Children wrote:Chick, why is your RVS vote still on me? I should ask Lady Angel the same thing. LolIn post 454, Chickadee wrote:Vax, I'm thunking you rolled scum here.
Also pretty much everyone (save for a few) have played with me, and know my history of being an easy fucking lynch. Unless you guys are going to provide actual reasons, votes off me please.
UNVOTE:
Why does it bother you? You were nowhere near lynch.
If you're asking specifically why I'm not voting tax instead, I'd like to interact with him a bit.
Interesting, perhaps her gifts correlate with trust levels? Mine was a lot more helpful.In post 489, Ginngie wrote:I got Barbie girl from chick
Don’t really understand why that means anything
I agree. I also think it’s a bad idea to alignment - particularly scumlock anyone on D1.In post 499, jjh927 wrote:I don't understand why anyone would think a good shot would be possible at this stage of the game anyway ngl
Interesting. I guess that should become more and more obvious as more and more people receive “gifts” from you, I guess.In post 503, Chickadee wrote:I can send things as often as I want to as many players as I want.But there’s another layer to it as well. So you may or may not like getting something from me.
No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.
I’m always curious about ANY votes on me. However, leaving an RVS on someone close to deadline could possibly mean something. I make it a rule, to never ignore votes on me and I still waiting on Lady Angel’s response to that.In post 516, Chickadee wrote:No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.
In post 515, Innocent Children wrote:Interesting. I guess that should become more and more obvious as more and more people receive “gifts” from you, I guess.In post 503, Chickadee wrote:I can send things as often as I want to as many players as I want.But there’s another layer to it as well. So you may or may not like getting something from me.
I’m not sure as to why someone would or wouldn’t like your gift. Would that be more likely to be intentional on your part or more open to interpretation on the part of the recipient?In post 513, Innocent Children wrote:Interesting, perhaps her gifts correlate with trust levels? Mine was a lot more helpful.In post 489, Ginngie wrote:I got Barbie girl from chick
Don’t really understand why that means anything
innocent childrenIn post 517, Innocent Children wrote:I’m always curious about ANY votes on me. However, leaving an RVS on someone close to deadline could possibly mean something. I make it a rule, to never ignore votes on me and I still waiting on Lady Angel’s response to that.In post 516, Chickadee wrote:No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.
Curiositity does not necessarily = being concerned.
Speaking of, Nero’s point about Vax not having much of a reaction to votes, is making me wonder about that too. Your take?
Why?
In post 520, Ginngie wrote:innocent childrenIn post 517, Innocent Children wrote:I’m always curious about ANY votes on me. However, leaving an RVS on someone close to deadline could possibly mean something. I make it a rule, to never ignore votes on me and I still waiting on Lady Angel’s response to that.In post 516, Chickadee wrote:No. I'm genuinely curious though why you're concerned about an RVS vote.In post 512, Innocent Children wrote:Do you have a problem with me asking you this? I don’t see why? I haven’t asked you about Vax. I only asked you and LA about RVS votes.
Curiositity does not necessarily = being concerned.
Speaking of, Nero’s point about Vax not having much of a reaction to votes, is making me wonder about that too. Your take?
Not a valid answer.