Mafiascum.net

In post 33, Formerfish wrote:

In post 29, Farren wrote:

In post 18, Spartan117 wrote:This is a very scummy response, town wouldn't be so worried of being voted as a townie being lynched gives reads of who was on their wagon and why, while scum are much more nervous about being lynched and this is hyper shown here.

VOTE: TheGildedSun

My experience has been that early signs of nervousness can sometimes be scum-motivated, but it's definitely not a smoking gun by any stretch. Some Town players absolutely get nervous about being voted.

What about GildedSun's behavior makes this "hyper shown here?"

I don't think we need to talk about this part anymore. It doesn't help us at all and can only hurt us.

In post 32, Formerfish wrote:

In post 28, Farren wrote:

In post 24, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:UNVOTE:

Getting super new vibes from Gilded, so I don't know that the jumpiness actually applies here. I also like the thought process of "they're voting me and I'm town so they must be mafia". While misguided and incorrect, I was the same way when I first started.

I like this, and I liked your question before it. I was wondering the same thing and would have asked it myself if you hadn't.

That's kinda the issue I have with it though. The question from ETL should have come first. The fact that she jumped the way she did and claimed a real vote only to back it off with what should have been an obvious explination of him being new.

I feel like ETL is tilting towards anything that is out of the ordinary and that scum would know to blend in and not rock the boat.

The reads are very surface level, and I know it's page 2 but ETL dropping real votes to retract them like that is ick.

In post 59, Formerfish wrote:

In post 56, Farren wrote:

In post 41, Formerfish wrote:I think for scum to win they have to kill townies and maybe you want to push me as scum to get me out of the way early, I don't know why you are making bad pushes. I think that if you were interested in why someone was playing a certain way that you would talk to them about it, but both times now you have kinda flown off half cocked only to retract within a post or two.

Is retracting a bad argument scummy, Town, or both? And why?

I dont think in itself retracting is scummy. For me it was the push to begin with followed up by the quick abandonment of it.

Like the slot is 7 days old and makes an obnewb (no offense) post and she jumps down his throat with a bad faith argument, and a vote, only to be like hey why did you say that, and they explain that they are new (WHICH IS OBVIOUS) and she pulls back like oh thats cool.

Unless ETL is going for a slayers gambit by targeting me and a newb to draw heat I dont get her play and dont like hwat i see.

In post 75, Formerfish wrote:

In post 73, Farren wrote:

In post 59, Formerfish wrote:I dont think in itself retracting is scummy. For me it was the push to begin with followed up by the quick abandonment of it.

Like the slot is 7 days old and makes an obnewb (no offense) post and she jumps down his throat with a bad faith argument, and a vote, only to be like hey why did you say that, and they explain that they are new (WHICH IS OBVIOUS) and she pulls back like oh thats cool.

Unless ETL is going for a slayers gambit by targeting me and a newb to draw heat I dont get her play and dont like hwat i see.

I don't see anything scummy about realizing another possibility and following up on it. I could see scenarios where switching a viewpoint quickly would be scummy, but not realizing all the possibilities and then investigating further? That's the sort of thing that results in fewer mislynches, not more.

Unless the whole thing was staged, but I'm not getting that vibe here.

Its not the walk back, it was the whole thing, it felt over the top for something that i felt was evident.

I think maybe I was a little salty about ETL playing along with my RQS and then voting me. She should know by her own admission that scum!me wouldnt be this open about rocking the boat, but she is still looking at me crosseyed.

Thats why im trying to figure out if this is tvt where we both feel like the other stepped on each others toes or if this is tvs where ETL is trying to set me up for a mislynch somehwere.

In post 431, Formerfish wrote:

In post 430, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:We have less than two days. This massive dispersion of votes is garbage.

Someone tell me why farren is town and shouldn’t be today’s lynch

It's not why you shouldn't lynch there, it's why you should lynch people before her.

Like Chibs slot. That guy was scum through and through

In post 234, Formerfish wrote:

In post 230, Chibiie wrote:

In post 227, Formerfish wrote:

In post 201, Chibiie wrote:

In post 198, Formerfish wrote:See the problem with poking bears is that sometimes sleeping ones dont give a fuck who they swat.

Derailing from subject, will ignore, but not forget.

Failure to answer a direct question. Noted.

VOTE: Chibs

Disingenuous scum can get rope, and i can go back to sleep now.

Here's your answer, btw:

In post 211, Chibiie wrote:

In post 209, Farren wrote:Post 27.

- RQS

Posts 28

- Interaction with ETL, not FF

/ 32 - 34.

- Indirect, objective view

Post 56 / 59 / 73 / 75.

- Indirect, objective view

This is what I call a "bruh" moment.

Yes, I was talking about you two, I've pretty much wrote you names in the same post :/
Gotta go, be back in a few hours.

You said we had no contact, direct or indirect, then list times where we had both. Gotcha, also ive been sick all weekend and have been playing on a limited basis. So yeah, in the last few pages you are correct, but you would be correct if you looked at any slot, not just the on you picked to harp on for your agenda to move forward.