Mafiascum.net

In post 465, InsideJob711 wrote:

In post 333, zoraster wrote:hello there. i wish the game didn't start without a notification PM, but here we are.

Everyone who posted earlier than me is slightly suspect.

In post 341, zoraster wrote:VOTE: Untrod Tripod for Governor.

Having a 1-shot governor be able to stop a lynch out of 40 people is fine, pro-information, and voting no governor gets nothing.

the vote here feels like he's tryna pocket ut.

The gov is just going to cause a lot of drama down the line, so let's just not. You get more information off a lynch then a governor.
Like, not really sure why you want shit because "voting to not get shit gets nothing" when nothing is very clearly better then shit

honestly just feels super agenda driven tbh, along with what was said prior.

We have 40 players, most of whom have power roles of some sort. I figure it's not the known 1-shot governor that's going to cause "drama," and frankly if the mod is spending up to 9 days of our time doing this, there's probably some town reason we'd want to figure out someone to pick. I'm not going to speculate on what that is, but avoiding the game mechanic is essentially trying to argue the game is poorly designed. Maybe it is, but I'm going to play the game in front of me.

I don't really care if it's UT or someone else, but the process of selecting the person and the interaction of what happens after information that I'm interested in.

--

In post 465, InsideJob711 wrote: this feels like a forced/weak attempt to start playing the game.

well shiver me timbers. You've found me out. I was trying to play the game.

VOTE: 711

Hot Take.

Maybe.

I haven't read very much yet.

Will be back tomorrow

- - -
- - -
- - O

if y ou beat me in a game of tic-tac-toe you get my vote for today. my first move is in the post above

In post 497, Bingle wrote:

In post 489, Formerfish wrote:We have things to discuss and they are very relevant to the game.

Things, Mr. Man? What things be those?

I'm in a unique position to do a thing, it's a one time thing, and it would allow us as a group to make a decision that can be more controlled. I know that some people might be against this, but I'm not here to entertain those watching.

I know I'm being cryptic, but I don't wanna out exactly what this thing I can do is. I also wanna make sure that I make the most of this and do the best thing for town.

Have I been vague enough?

by today i mean this game phase where we choose a governor

still think 7/11 is town tho from the very quick iso i did and also because of the first couple pages

In post 504, Formerfish wrote:

In post 497, Bingle wrote:

In post 489, Formerfish wrote:We have things to discuss and they are very relevant to the game.

Things, Mr. Man? What things be those?

I'm in a unique position to do a thing, it's a one time thing, and it would allow us as a group to make a decision that can be more controlled. I know that some people might be against this, but I'm not here to entertain those watching.

I know I'm being cryptic, but I don't wanna out exactly what this thing I can do is. I also wanna make sure that I make the most of this and do the best thing for town.

Have I been vague enough?

highly recommend voting for 711 or playing tic-tac-toe if you disagree w/ me

I'm doing neither. Don't like it, kill me.

that's kinda boring coming from a player that's voting someone who isn't even in the game

FF's ISO actually doesn't look good

huh

wait nvm he says something somethingg

In post 509, Enter wrote:FF's ISO actually doesn't look good

huh

something aggressive @ formerfish

I don't really care what you think of my iso. You don't know me or my game and you have no idea what I'm doing.

Get off my lawn.

oh wazzup bbmolla

i'm tr1ckster
also extrapolated eagle

i don't remember which one i knew you briefly as maybe slightly more than an acquaintance by

but i think i knew you as one of 'em

or maybe i was just a creepy onlooker

either way

sell me on that no governor stuff

In post 512, Formerfish wrote:

In post 509, Enter wrote:FF's ISO actually doesn't look good

huh

something aggressive @ formerfish

I don't really care what you think of my iso. You don't know me or my game and you have no idea what I'm doing.

Get off my lawn.

i need a giph of a reallly really really stressed person that i can post here and say that i saw you while wlaking down the street earlier today

but i'm too lazy to find one

so just know that i'm pointing out you're really stressed right now in a 40 person game

I'm not stressed at all, but thanks for thinking you know enough about me to comment on my mental state.

Do I owe you a copay, or can I just told it into my therapy?

In post 515, Formerfish wrote:I'm not stressed at all, but thanks for thinking you know enough about me to comment on my mental state.

Do I owe you a copay, or can I just told it into my therapy?

just send me your insurance information, i'll charge it to them

warning u the cost will be high tho cuz i had to diagnose u with something u apparently don't even know what is

unless u've got a better reason for being unnecessarily hostile, stressed, tense, all knotted up in a ball, call it what u want, but u've got it

In post 500, zoraster wrote:but avoiding the game mechanic is essentially trying to argue the game is poorly designed. Maybe it is, but I'm going to play the game in front of me.

avoiding the governor doesn't make the game poorly designed at all, if anything, it being a governor is good design.
Its a power that is very prune to starting up discussion.
You are going to have people say "No, we don't want this power" and people say "I want this power to be distributed."
Saying that you don't want the power to be distributed should not make you feel like "oh, I didn't want someone to get a 1-shot governor so now I feel like his game is poorly designed"

In post 501, Enter wrote:VOTE: 711

Hot Take.

Maybe.

I haven't read very much yet.

Will be back tomorrow

if ur voting me to have the governor, just vote for no governor

In post 517, Enter wrote:unless u've got a better reason for being unnecessarily hostile, stressed, tense, all knotted up in a ball, call it what u want, but u've got it

Nah.

I'll just wait for bingle, you aren't interesting to me right now.

In post 519, InsideJob711 wrote:

In post 501, Enter wrote:VOTE: 711

Hot Take.

Maybe.

I haven't read very much yet.

Will be back tomorrow

if ur voting me to have the governor, just vote for no governor

free thinkers unite!

VOTE: no governor

In post 520, Formerfish wrote:you aren't interesting to me right now

In post 516, Enter wrote:warning u the cost will be high tho

In post 452, Amrun wrote:

In post 448, Firebringer wrote:

In post 445, Amrun wrote:

In post 442, Firebringer wrote:

In post 438, Amrun wrote:Bbmolla is acting scummy (for him)

nope, this is pretty standard bbmolla

I’ve played mafia with him in person and many times.

Obviously, it’s not a terribly reliable read given his what, ONE post? But it’s my first impression. This is kind of a bizarre response to it.

thats nice, your still wrong.

I could well be wrong.

Your response to it is what is interesting.

So it’s “standard” bbmolla? Why does “standard” bbmolla = town?

I’m perfectly aware he’s prone to goofing off as any alignment. Why, then, would you insist I’m “wrong” to say he is scummy?

I take it back... bbmolla is not scum with Firebringer, who is scum.

That's my pocketer you're calling scum.

If bbmolla rolls town more than scum than town!bbmolla would be the standard that you compare deviations to, no?

Bizarre is immensely strong verbiage to describe a pretty benign observation and response.