Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 12:59 pm
441 was mostly just looking at the ico/hh thing that happened
and then 443 was after i isoed some ppl (including hh)
and then 443 was after i isoed some ppl (including hh)
441 was mostly just looking at the ico/hh thing that happened
I didn't claim in Micro 900 and it worked out fine imo.In post 478, Chemist1422 wrote:So why didn’t you claim if you hadn’t noticed beforehand?In post 476, Alduskkel wrote:literally just noticed I'm not even at L-1 because Ico was already voting me when it made the L-1 vote
You think I'm buddying Icon? How?In post 480, Look At Me Im So Town wrote:as for HH situation, my read of you doesnt center on scum!HH. Yes, part of the situation is how you interacted with Icon over the HH slot, but then I saw an interaction from you with Mena wrt the
Icon slot where you were asking Mena to move you off the Icon slot. So I initially was concerned about you defending a partner, but after seeing you do something slightly different, you could be buddying both HH and Icon.
BP
I don't think that's true. I think people lurk independently of alignment.In post 487, JJJ wrote:Scum is totally more likely to lurk than town.In post 458, Alduskkel wrote:Well, this isn't a perfect world. Plus, lynching people for reasons like that isn't really any more likely to hit scum than a random lynch. So I don't see how your Chemist vote is a real attempt at scumhunting.
I was once a player who liked voting lurkers. It didn't help me catch scum.In post 488, AaronFrost wrote:Why do you think votes on players that haven't been active/useful are lazy? Wouldn't that be a good way to make them contribute?In post 452, Alduskkel wrote:Why do I have to townread you to see HH's vote on you as lazy?
For the record, you're squarely at "null" for me right now.
townlean yeahIn post 501, emps wrote:chem is ur read on mena like a townlean or smth rn?
what do u think of the aldus slot? did u unvote because of icos fake vote shenanigans or smth else?
uncrowned, when u gave intent, were u aware that icos vote was fake?
ico, why were u trying to get aldus to claim this early on?
What do you mean by 'no content'? I feel like you're using that phrase a lot to just shade people.In post 495, JJJ wrote:Another post with no content. - YIn post 494, Chemist1422 wrote:meh I guess this is a towny readIn post 492, Menalque wrote:yeah I'm p sure chem is town
in my experience when I call scum out for a specific behavior they tend to stop doing that thing instead of doubling down
I'm not saying we have to lynch the lurkers, but wagoning them helps them produce AI content, then it's worth it imo.In post 503, Alduskkel wrote:I was once a player who liked voting lurkers. It didn't help me catch scum.
I'll be honest, my vote is still on Aldus because I'm honestly not sure where else to put it right now. I've been feeling a little better about his recent posting.In post 502, Uncrowned wrote:Also now I don't feel like an Aldus lynch would be good. Feels like we've lingered around this long enough, the lack of real opposition towards it leads me to believe that scum would be okay with this lynch. Aldus hasn't been particularly scummy imo.
well it's way better than getting lynched day 1 lolIn post 506, emps wrote:aldu i wouldnt consider getting n1 killed as a pr as "working out fine" lmao
Yeah, I didn't mean to suggest I thought Chemist was a lurker. I just get "lurkers" mixed up with "people who don't post AI content" in my head.AaronFrost wrote:I'm not saying we have to lynch the lurkers, but wagoning them helps them produce AI content, then it's worth it imo.In post 503, Alduskkel wrote:I was once a player who liked voting lurkers. It didn't help me catch scum.
I wouldn't really classify Chemist as a lurker either.
2 or 3, idrIn post 497, emps wrote:ooh so like at least 2 games with me? im kinda curious abt who u r lulIn post 473, JJJ wrote:I'm not going to read Micro 900 but also I don't really think you're flipping scum which is why I'm not voting you. I've played enough with the other three to have a decent grasp of their metas.In post 472, Alduskkel wrote:I'm just gonna come out and say that anyone who doesn't read or at least look at Micro 900 isn't doing their due diligence in reading me, Menalque, Iconeum, or emps.
-X
-XIn post 511, JJJ wrote:2 or 3, idrIn post 497, emps wrote:ooh so like at least 2 games with me? im kinda curious abt who u r lulIn post 473, JJJ wrote:I'm not going to read Micro 900 but also I don't really think you're flipping scum which is why I'm not voting you. I've played enough with the other three to have a decent grasp of their metas.In post 472, Alduskkel wrote:I'm just gonna come out and say that anyone who doesn't read or at least look at Micro 900 isn't doing their due diligence in reading me, Menalque, Iconeum, or emps.
-X
Because I'm looking to advance the game. I felt like things were stagnating slightly and I felt like stating intent would be the best way to spice things up.In post 506, emps wrote:uncrowned, why would u declare intent to hammer with 7 days left till deadline? why do u think ico would want aldu to claim this early on?
also aldu i wouldnt consider getting n1 killed as a pr as "working out fine" lmao
Prior to reading Chemist's recent posts, I wanted to lynch him. His posts lately have been... better, but I'm still not really confident on him. I think until I do my reread through of the game, he'd be my preferred lynch.In post 509, AaronFrost wrote:I'll be honest, my vote is still on Aldus because I'm honestly not sure where else to put it right now. I've been feeling a little better about his recent posting.In post 502, Uncrowned wrote:Also now I don't feel like an Aldus lynch would be good. Feels like we've lingered around this long enough, the lack of real opposition towards it leads me to believe that scum would be okay with this lynch. Aldus hasn't been particularly scummy imo.
Who's your preferred lynch right now?
wy not?In post 493, Menalque wrote:icon why were you pushing for a claim at L-2?
Because generating preemptive claims is much more beneficial to scum and because you did this in autumnal when you were scum?In post 515, Iconeum wrote:wy not?In post 493, Menalque wrote:icon why were you pushing for a claim at L-2?
Man, between the holiday and the shorter prod timer, whoops. Werent you townreading Icon? What's up with the naked vote?
This post pings me funny. You're off wagon but now you're shading him for not claiming when he wasnt at L-1. What's the point of this message?In post 478, Chemist1422 wrote:So why didn’t you claim if you hadn’t noticed beforehand?In post 476, Alduskkel wrote:literally just noticed I'm not even at L-1 because Ico was already voting me when it made the L-1 vote
It started as a gut townread. What changed it?In post 492, Menalque wrote:yeah I'm p sure chem is town
You did that in 6 minutes?In post 500, emps wrote:441 was mostly just looking at the ico/hh thing that happened
and then 443 was after i isoed some ppl (including hh)
In your experience, do scum often offer resistance to wagons even if they're on scum? Because that hasn't been mine.In post 502, Uncrowned wrote:That's the third time I've been caught out by a fake vote / fake hammer. I hate myself.
But no, when I gave intent I didn't realize Ico's vote was fake.
Also now I don't feel like an Aldus lynch would be good. Feels like we've lingered around this long enough, the lack of real opposition towards it leads me to believe that scum would be okay with this lynch. Aldus hasn't been particularly scummy imo.