Mafiascum.net

zenith likes drugs, everyone

Oh I should probably put a votecount here even though it's not a pagetop due to that important announcement from gobble

Stone	Votes	Voters
Warrior Stone	4	Blatant Scum, Wake88, Zenith, Eve
Thief Stone	3	alimdia, Sujimichi, Aeronaut
Mage Stone	1	gobbledygook
Not Voting	-	Mastina, Dongfish

The morning will end in (expired on 2020-01-23 05:00:00) or with 6 voters for a stone.

In post 496, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 494, alimdia wrote:

In post 478, Eve wrote:ah i see well i'm fine to vote warrior today and then the other one tomorrow - scum PT shouldn't be as useful to them with one of their members down and we can power everyone up once which might be good for info and claiming later

VOTE: Warrior

Just leaving this here...

In post 475, Blatant Scum wrote:

In post 404, jjh927 wrote:Role:
Level-Based Rolestopper: Once per night, you may target a player.

If their role has a stone associated with it, and its path level is equal to or higher than the current cycle number

, their night actions cannot fail and they will be protected from one nightkill.

I’m not getting the implication you’re trying to draw.

I believe that he is showing that contrary to what Blatant Scum stated is his assumptions based on dead players' roles and his own role, there are circumstances where a high path level is beneficial for town. The example quoted shows that popsofctown's role would be able to protect a player if their associated stone had a level equal to or higher than the current cycle (I am assuming this means phase). For example, a Thief Stone level of 2 would allow popsofctown's role to work on players associated with the Thief Stone during Night 1 (the second cycle/phase).

In post 500, gobbledygook wrote:zenith likes drugs, everyone

Shhh.. It's just some skooma.. What are ya, a milk drinker?

I've logged over a thousand hours on single playthrough of vanilla skyrim, but don't have pc so never played modded. Though I've dreamed about being able to quaff some skooma then maybe run around nekkid for a while before running into this monstrosity, summoning my bound bow, and fighting for me life..

I asked for that mod but I didn’t get it!!

In post 504, gobbledygook wrote:I asked for that mod but I didn’t get it!!

I also asked for thomas the tank dragon lul. I guess it's popular.
Also asked for DBZ mod.
Didn't get either.
Happy with my role though. I'll be claiming it soon.

Who are you waiting on Zenith?

And can you relist what everyone claimed when you do whatever you're doing?

UNVOTE:

I've seen something new, so I gotta rethink something

Ok, im an asshole, hello.

-Fish

In post 66, Aeronaut wrote:

In post 63, wrong fish wrote:I think we just kill people alphabetically until the game ends, then we reinstall the mods alphabetically until it doesnt work - you get the gist

VOTE: Aeronaut
Dong

I respect the objectivity as someone with a D name


Also hey VOTE: Pine

Well, we do go be our full Name, Ze Dongfish.

In post 141, Eve wrote:

In post 139, Sujimichi wrote:Why did you feel the need to out a neighborhood that you are participating in? And, if Private Threads are meant to be locked, why is alimdia able to “blow” yours up at current?

i'm not sure - i can't ask him because i'm not allowed to post there right now

maybe he has an immune to thieves modifier?

Wait, you arent allowed to post in your neighborhood but one of your neighbors is yelling their head off?

In post 164, Eve wrote:sorry if you took offence alimdia - i really didn't mean it in a bad way

i think you should take a break and come back tomorrow honestly didn't realise you were so emotional

i'm gonna call it a night too - hopefully talk to you in the thread tomorrow when you're ready friend!

What the fuck.

Dong I highly recommend you read the whole thing while putting your thoughts on a notepad++ or something, because most of what you are commenting on.... will be made redundant shortly.

In post 502, Sujimichi wrote:

In post 496, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 494, alimdia wrote:

In post 478, Eve wrote:ah i see well i'm fine to vote warrior today and then the other one tomorrow - scum PT shouldn't be as useful to them with one of their members down and we can power everyone up once which might be good for info and claiming later

VOTE: Warrior

Just leaving this here...

In post 475, Blatant Scum wrote:

In post 404, jjh927 wrote:Role:
Level-Based Rolestopper: Once per night, you may target a player.

If their role has a stone associated with it, and its path level is equal to or higher than the current cycle number

, their night actions cannot fail and they will be protected from one nightkill.

I’m not getting the implication you’re trying to draw.

I believe that he is showing that contrary to what Blatant Scum stated is his assumptions based on dead players' roles and his own role, there are circumstances where a high path level is beneficial for town. The example quoted shows that popsofctown's role would be able to protect a player if their associated stone had a level equal to or higher than the current cycle (I am assuming this means phase). For example, a Thief Stone level of 2 would allow popsofctown's role to work on players associated with the Thief Stone during Night 1 (the second cycle/phase).

You hit the nail on the head

In post 181, popsofctown wrote:an innocent child now.

Thats not until lvl 5, we still have a ways to go.

In post 514, alimdia wrote:Dong I highly recommend you read the whole thing while putting your thoughts on a notepad++ or something, because most of what you are commenting on.... will be made redundant shortly.

and so we don't get the thread flooded with catch up posts that aren't important

In post 189, alimdia wrote:Like how did she know I had a dayvig???

Wait, what?

In post 191, TiphaineDeath wrote:No, post #153 was a scumclaim, and the fact that you don't immediately know that tells me you are in fact scum xD. VOTE: sujimichi

This is a super low effort push...

In post 205, popsofctown wrote:

Prod Dongfish pls

My bad Pops, im here now.

-Fish

In post 241, alimdia wrote:

In post 236, TiphaineDeath wrote:Here's another random flung vote for you then, VOTE: Alim

I consider post#228 a scum-claim, and will exercise my position as resident tenacious delirium by leaving vote here until there is a REALLY good reason not to. Also, anyone who can tell me why I made that vote gets a cookie.

VOTE: TiphaineDeath

No you give the reasons for the vote, not ask people to give you one because you couldn't think one up.

In post 242, TiphaineDeath wrote:Oh sweetie, you're so smart. Clearly that's me being scummy and not trying to figure out which people I can talk to and work with in this game in a way that I do ALL THE FUCKING TIME. Clearly that's not you OMGUSing me at all, especially since there's already a wagon on me to make it easy for you to get a mislynch. Nope, definitely town here.

Scum more <3.

This could be SvS.

In post 254, Blatant Scum wrote:

In post 249, Sujimichi wrote:Blatant Scum, what are your thoughts on what has transpired so far? Any stances on players?

I have a town read on TiphaineDeath, but I wish to keep the reason a secret for a while, observing his reactions on the wagon to make sure my read is correct.

Does this ever get explained?

facepalm*

In post 268, TiphaineDeath wrote:Yeah, 10000% one or more of eve+ami=scum, maybe both, but DEF one at this point.

Noted.