Posted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 5:56 pm
ill be out here trying to solve this game till the day i die
Do you still think my arguments with Pikachu are manufactured?In post 470, Natsu wrote:Pikachu + Luca. I see the SE's are doing a bang-up job on teaching us newbies how it's done.
No but seriously I want both of you dead so this game can get under control.
I'm feeling better about Arthur's slot with IMASPY in it now. I am noticing that I am getting scum-read fairly often by multiple different people, which honestly runs counter to my scum games where I think I was scum mleaned only once during RVS. I guess that makes sense.
For the record I usually post on weekends but I ended up with a cold. Been mostly observing when I have the energy.
You should practice what you preach, Pikachu.In post 473, Detective Pikachu wrote:really though why is this game full of a bunch of condescending pricks?In post 470, Natsu wrote:Pikachu + Luca. I see the SE's are doing a bang-up job on teaching us newbies how it's done.
being new doesn't give you permission to be rude
In post 484, dsjstr wrote:I have to say that I see Spy as more of a mature player than the last newbie game I played with him. They will be another Null read for me, once again I feel like I can see past what they are doing but then again I just see them as improving like anyone should. Based on a purely meta read they are Nul, for the record that is also how I judged Luca and 72o.
Why do I get the impression you’re treading on eggshells with your reads?In post 485, dsjstr wrote:Deferentially don't think my reads are 100% accurate
Slight TR on DP was that:In post 299, Natsu wrote:The interplay between Hectic and Pikachu has been sending off alarms in my head. I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed it. I guess it's because all the SE's have played with each other before. Pikachu is really reaching in most of his scumreads, and seems to be crafting narratives out of nothing.In post 293, ROUND ONE wrote:notice how his scumreads are the people hectic called out for absolutely no reasonIn post 265, Detective Pikachu wrote:BIn post 105, Detective Pikachu wrote:Because at least one of them rolled scum and possibly bothIn post 103, Hectic wrote:Why aren't you answering the RQS, Arthur and Luca?
This is not saying you're scum because you didn't answer rqs, it's saying you didn't answer rqs because you're scum. And it was also half joking
interesting
@72offsuit, honestly look at Pikachu's iso and tell me how on earth you see it as being a townread? He looks like a sharper version of my scum partner from last game.
Yes, it was a leading question, no Its not a misrep.In post 311, Luca Blight wrote:This is a leading question and feels like a misrep as well - Arthur has a problem with the lack of explanation, not the fact they were based on RVS.In post 94, 72offsuit wrote:Why would you not think the reads based off RVS are genuine?In post 45, ArthurConyl wrote:@Detective PikachuIn post 43, Detective Pikachu wrote:72offsuit
Luca Blight (SE)
Hectic (SE)
DkKoba
ROUND ONE
dsjstr
Natsu
ArthurConyl
1. I can't work out if you're trying to be serious or not
2. Why are dsjstr, Natsu and I considered scummy?
3. Normally a weird post like this would be considered scummy, listing everyone like you're so smart and not even giving justification? But then again I can't work out if you're scum or just making a bad play.
Because you dislike the results of said reads?
I didnt specifically scum read you. All i had was lurking from you. Your afk seems genuine though and your catch up has been good. I wanted to put more pressure on you by FoSing you.In post 314, Luca Blight wrote:Btw 72, fluff galore? I feel you’re massively exaggerating. Lurking? That is an assumption. I’ve been busy recently and only have time to post in spurts, as I’m doing currently.
I can’t help but feel Arthur is an easy target based on what he’s posted so far. It’s not spectacular, but I don’t see anything patricianly scummy about it, and I liked the tone of his defiant post greeting the thread.In post 276, 72offsuit wrote:Choo choo, chugga chugga choo choo!
Anyone boarding the AC ArthurConyl express wagon?
VOTE: ArthurConyl
You seem to TR Pikachu, so is there any reason you chose to go in another direction rather than join my wagon?
Pretty much what hectic said. in p333.In post 332, Luca Blight wrote:@Hectic/72
I notice you both TR Koba for being irritated with Pikachu’s gimmick. Could you explain why this is Town-indicative?
bad replyIn post 392, Detective Pikachu wrote:I have a life
im like this as scum too uwuIn post 386, DkKoba wrote:R1 sounds very innocent idk how to explain it but their tone is so pure i cant ever vote them here
In post 394, Detective Pikachu wrote:ellitells are hit or miss but they aren't always missIn post 319, Luca Blight wrote:your other reason is also BS given I had made 4 RVS posts at that point
what do you like about it? he only commits to a townread on you 0.o
I didn't say wagon analysis is overrated; I said wagon analysis pre-flip is kinda pointlessIn post 324, Natsu wrote:Excuse me but I intentionally helped get Hectic to L-1 in order to have a wagon to analyze. I believe it was Pikachu who said that wagon analysis is overrated (another reason I'm suspect of him, I could have easily lost my last game as scum if people just stared at the L-1 wagons long enough).
?In post 324, Natsu wrote:~Moving onto other players. I still feel like Hectic is a townlean. The tunneling on Arthur could be a scum move.
doing what? bickering or having confidence in my reads?In post 324, Natsu wrote:Even though the bickering you two had seemed manufactured, Pikachu is doing that with everyone he scumreads.
can you identify which posts make you feel this way?In post 347, dsjstr wrote:Hectic/Natsu: Scum - Early on I saw them as a pair. I didn't see real attempts at trying to lynch each other, they then tried to distance themselves.
which posts specifically did you like?In post 357, DkKoba wrote:I come back and see 3 votes on Artur but still not Artur, I feel scammed.
Also, I'm moving Luca into a townlean here.
sure but they look like they're kinda making me lose interest in this game soIn post 386, DkKoba wrote:R1 sounds very innocent idk how to explain it but their tone is so pure i cant ever vote them here
watch him try and push me for thisIn post 399, Detective Pikachu wrote:kinda feel like r1 is playing in a deliberately anti-fun manner? this is newbie queue not "play in an intentionally annoying manner" queue
oh i added that afterIn post 422, Hectic wrote:Hmm, why did you specify who you'd lynch in your nullreads when you already clarified DK was town null and Natsu scum null?In post 297, ROUND ONE wrote:Town
Me
Arthur
72
Null (top is town-null,bottom is scumnull)
DK
Natsu
Scumreads
Luca
DP
Hectic
Naturally im sure the nullreads are town *for now*, but in a case I had to lynch between them id pick Natsu
Seems like an odd thing to focus on rather than your scumreads.
no no i just do that sometimesIn post 477, IMASPY wrote:i think round 1 is pretty much just playing scummy day 1 because they are numb to caring about day 1.....i have them as my number 2 town read.In post 344, ROUND ONE wrote:i dont remember pog
this had nothing to do with the game whatsoeverIn post 486, IMASPY wrote:this furthered my town read on round oneIn post 364, ROUND ONE wrote:ok thats better in one way but not in the other wayIn post 363, dsjstr wrote:R1: Town - Good girlIn post 361, ROUND ONE wrote:"R1: Town - good boy"In post 347, dsjstr wrote:Luca: Null - He was interactive in his scum game and distant in his town game, he is being a different kind of interactive this game... but he knows I know that(I know what you're trying to do)
Pikachu: Null - I don't see scum targeting each other like that
72o: Town - Was paranoid in his town game but I'd say it is more likely that he just feels more confident that his first game(I know I did)
Hectic/Natsu: Scum - Early on I saw them as a pair. I didn't see real attempts at trying to lynch each other, they then tried to distance themselves.
R1: Town - good boy
Arthur: Town - Just playing the odds; he seemed like he really wanted to be able to solve the game but we were too silly for him
Koba: Null - Sure
dont