Mafiascum.net

In post 489, HoldenGolden wrote:This might sound like a stupid question, but what was your plan in the post you voted him? The way you worded it makes it so you are not opposing the lurking p lynch on tictac while justifying being off the wagon. I think you can understand why this bugs me.

In post 472, Hectic wrote:It's basically just putting out early readlists and being more transparent, Hodlne. The joking is definitely still there.

Since I'm probably never using this alt again: Paragon

In post 466, Aloratom wrote:

In post 458, Hectic wrote:V/LA until the 24th. I'll still be trying to read and contribute when I can.

profii, I went looking for them.
AaronFF, the questions weren't serious.

Aloratom's last post is scummy because he states a hypothesis, then acknowledges evidence which disproves his hypothesis, but then makes the false conclusion that he wants anyway.

I'm not obliged to trust what others say about your meta.

In post 477, Morning Tweet wrote: I think it's kinda forcing Hectic to be scum no matter what he does. I assumed it was a joke so I just called it "not nice".. but apparently it wasn't

@Hectic

I'm stupid!!

In post 495, bob3141 wrote:tictac (4): Gamma Emerald, Cat Scratch Fever, SirCakez, Wake88

The question is. Does this wagon have scum in it or have scum avoided it.

If scum have avoided it, then why. Is tic scum or does scum not want to be see to go after lurker lynch.

I certainly cant see more than one of them being scum. If tic flips town.

In post 482, SirCakez wrote:

In post 452, Aloratom wrote:I don't mind the tictac wagon. Hectic's nonsense filler questions, though, are just padding his ISO, polluting it. I don't see him accomplishing much. People say that's consistent with his meta. That's okay I guess, but it seems off.

VOTE: Hectic

What makes you think his questions are off if you're aware it's his meta?

In post 458, Hectic wrote:AaronFF, the questions weren't serious.

In post 464, Morning Tweet wrote:Tictac is all fine and dandy-- but what do you guys think about profii?

In post 465, HoldenGolden wrote:I honestly cannot remember hectics playstyle past RVS and even if I did it would be outdated. Sadness. I want to say though as town that he keeps the joking up throughout the day when most others get serious

In post 472, Hectic wrote:It's basically just putting out early readlists and being more transparent, Hodlne. The joking is definitely still there.

Since I'm probably never using this alt again: Paragon

In post 500, Aloratom wrote:

In post 489, HoldenGolden wrote:This might sound like a stupid question, but what was your plan in the post you voted him? The way you worded it makes it so you are not opposing the lurking p lynch on tictac while justifying being off the wagon. I think you can understand why this bugs me.

I wasn't opposed to the tictac wagon as a pressuring device, but it looked at that point that there were enough pressure votes there.

I wasn't going to join it with that number of people on it, especially after they had been prodded when it initially looked like they were going to be active.

I had other concerns at that time.

In post 506, SirCakez wrote:

In post 482, SirCakez wrote:

In post 452, Aloratom wrote:I don't mind the tictac wagon. Hectic's nonsense filler questions, though, are just padding his ISO, polluting it. I don't see him accomplishing much. People say that's consistent with his meta. That's okay I guess, but it seems off.

VOTE: Hectic

What makes you think his questions are off if you're aware it's his meta?

Also Alo can you answer this?

In post 511, AaronFrost wrote:

In post 500, Aloratom wrote:

In post 489, HoldenGolden wrote:This might sound like a stupid question, but what was your plan in the post you voted him? The way you worded it makes it so you are not opposing the lurking p lynch on tictac while justifying being off the wagon. I think you can understand why this bugs me.

I wasn't opposed to the tictac wagon as a pressuring device, but it looked at that point that there were enough pressure votes there.

I wasn't going to join it with that number of people on it, especially after they had been prodded when it initially looked like they were going to be active.

I had other concerns at that time.

This post reads overly cautious to me

tictac was at 3 or 4 votes, which is only about half the required amount to lynch so there's not much danger in adding more pressure there, which you should want to do if you're town. The bolded part especially screams to me "I don't want to get caught randomly hopping onto a lurker wagon"

In post 410, Aloratom wrote:

In post 396, bob3141 wrote:

In post 391, davesaz wrote:

In post 228, bob3141 wrote:at first galnce i woudl say alorat seems different from his scum game. There he was say x and y was scum without any reason.

So Bob, gotta ask -- in this game he said you were scum without any reason.
If that's what he does in scumgames, then why were you so nonchalant about it here?

This feels a little selective. I say alor in general is not acting like he was in his scum game. And you jump on the fact that he made a quick early scum read. Although he may of given a bit of a scum read at the same time he is saying things like in post 262. Where he says he hasnt got handle on me. Thus what ever read he has is not strong. With this same read being a page 4 read and not real much of big deal.

What level of reason wuld you expect anyoen to have so early into teh game. where if everyone posted equally no one woudl hae more than 7 posts. With me havign 3 or so mostly rvs posts. What level of reason would you realy expect any player to have at that point.

And everything else regarding me in his posts has not been to push me but just generaly commenting on early events in neutral manner.


In his scum game he as active in throwing shade around and persistently push the same reads and pushs even though he never backed them up

Did you think that RVS post where I voted you was a serious post?

In post 517, Aloratom wrote:

In post 506, SirCakez wrote:

In post 482, SirCakez wrote:

In post 452, Aloratom wrote:I don't mind the tictac wagon. Hectic's nonsense filler questions, though, are just padding his ISO, polluting it. I don't see him accomplishing much. People say that's consistent with his meta. That's okay I guess, but it seems off.

VOTE: Hectic

What makes you think his questions are off if you're aware it's his meta?

Also Alo can you answer this?

I wasn't aware that that was his meta. Others were saying that. They were reaching the conclusion that he was Town based on it. I didn't like that. The padding of the ISO with fluff bothered me. But now that I know who it it, I have a better handle on it and am more inclined to agree, although I still think something I can't put a name to right now doesn't feel right about Hectic.

A lot of people are saying the same thing about Wake, that his aggressiveness is part of his Town meta. That's fine, but to me, that doesn't mean he's Town this game. He could be playing against type. I think that's even more likely with him, perhaps, since he's chimed in and agreed with at least one or two of those meta conclusions made on him.

In post 515, Hectic wrote:tictac's play so far is a stark contrast to their last 3 town games, and fits more with their most recent scumgame.

One
Two
Three
Scumgame - replaced out

In the town games, they have a lot of thoughts, and are straight in there from the start with the solving. Scumgame has less reasoning provided with posts.

In this game, they didn't make any attempts to solve and have only fluff posted, which is the polar opposite of their town meta.

VOTE: Chemist1422 I don't have much time nowadays but hopefully this will flip scum and clear me!