Mafiascum.net

i think u are making bad gambits and plays rn pooky. i want to engage in good faith but u need to engage the game in good faith for that. what datisi pointed out is inherently anti town but as we all (should) know, anti-town does not equal not town

In post 288, Datisi wrote:VOTE: pooky

sorry you rolled scum again

this is you calling me scum

In post 291, Datisi wrote:when you flip red today it's gonna spew them town

this is you calling me scum

what the FUCk there was 10 pages in the time it took me to sleep??

In post 490, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:So it has nothing to do with 1 random vote this game, Datisi driving the train cuz this is some kind of coping mechanism for him.

In post 487, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i already said this is some ego-driven revenge bullshit for the other game.

you won't admit it, you'll just randomly make up some bad excuses for it

that's fine

hope me getting evicted checks that bucket list for you

how is this not bad faith discrediting??? like this is literally insulting

yall can we lay out our thoughts on the table instead of going at eachothers throats for petty stuff

In post 497, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 493, Datisi wrote:literally in the first quote in the spoiler

"you scum Datisi?" is a question, not a statement.

yeah a questing, with obvious heavy implication behind it

like don't play dumb

notice how what you said to me is completely different from what I said to you;

"You scum Datisi?"

That's a QUESTION.

Now if someone comes and hammers me - that's 100% on you playing bad - not on me.

In post 506, Datisi wrote:

In post 497, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 493, Datisi wrote:literally in the first quote in the spoiler

"you scum Datisi?" is a question, not a statement.

yeah a questing, with obvious heavy implication behind it

like don't play dumb

questions =/= statement

I've literally stated you are probably town multiple times.

I have never stated you are scum.

How are you so bad that you can't read.

In post 494, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:it's basically recency bias - you saw so much of my scumposting you think everything I post is scummy.

is it recency bias or am i some insane person taking revenge on you for ??? reasons - you can't have it both ways

you're literally picking whatever shit you can and seeing what sticks

pooky: engage datisi in good faith and explain why you did what you have done so far, give us a rundown.

datisi: let pooky have a chance to show you his thought processes. then judge them as town or mafia. i know youve thrown out stuff like "bad faith" and "discrediting" but these are in the end more NAI than anything bc they can come from ego easily. if you're gonna build a case lets look at how people have been engaging and analyzing, and go from there.

In post 504, Datisi wrote:how is this not bad faith discrediting??? like this is literally insulting

me saying you're wrong about me isn't the same thing as discrediting your read of the game. I literally said I'd listen to you about bugspray and let's see how your read works out.

i suggest BOTH of yall take a 5-10 minute walk around wherever you are before you post again. clear your heads.

In post 508, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:questions =/= statement

I've literally stated you are probably town multiple times.

I have never stated you are scum.

post said:

In post 306, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i don't believe you believe that

you're just reaching for excuses now lol

this is obviously impling you think i'm scum

In post 508, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:How are you so bad that you can't read.

discrediting

DATISI STOP

In post 510, DkKoba wrote:pooky: engage datisi in good faith and explain why you did what you have done so far, give us a rundown.

datisi: let pooky have a chance to show you his thought processes. then judge them as town or mafia. i know youve thrown out stuff like "bad faith" and "discrediting" but these are in the end more NAI than anything bc they can come from ego easily. if you're gonna build a case lets look at how people have been engaging and analyzing, and go from there.

In post 512, DkKoba wrote:i suggest BOTH of yall take a 5-10 minute walk around wherever you are before you post again. clear your heads.

In post 509, Datisi wrote:

In post 494, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:it's basically recency bias - you saw so much of my scumposting you think everything I post is scummy.

is it recency bias or am i some insane person taking revenge on you for ??? reasons - you can't have it both ways

you're literally picking whatever shit you can and seeing what sticks

i never said you were insane

i said this is an ego-driven revenge move for the other game. that's why the 4 people voting me are the same as the 4 people who were in the other game - you guys want to do some revenge nonsense cuz you feel like fools for the other game. Just saying it how it is.

ugh...

In post 513, Datisi wrote:this is obviously impling you think i'm scum

nope it means you're literally making up shit to get me lynched for the other game because this is cross-game ego revenge lynch

I'm literally 1000% sure if ANY other player on this website OTHER than me had made the EXACT same posts I did in this game, he would not have to put up with your complete BS line of attack.

*sigh*

In post 516, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 509, Datisi wrote:

In post 494, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:it's basically recency bias - you saw so much of my scumposting you think everything I post is scummy.

is it recency bias or am i some insane person taking revenge on you for ??? reasons - you can't have it both ways

you're literally picking whatever shit you can and seeing what sticks

i never said you were insane

i said this is an ego-driven revenge move for the other game. that's why the 4 people voting me are the same as the 4 people who were in the other game - you guys want to do some revenge nonsense cuz you feel like fools for the other game. Just saying it how it is.

you are literally insulting me by saying that

like, i ask again, WHY WOULD I BE TAKING REVENGE ON YOU

i was the fucking moderator of that game

like ???????????

and you're saying i'm tunnelling you for no reason bc that other game which is literally an insult to my playing
you're trying to make me seem tunnelled so nobody takes me seriously

how is no1 taking you seriously

you got me at E-1 on literally first day of the game thread being open

you're trying to make other people not take me seriously

i'm not saying you're succeding so far

In post 522, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:how is no1 taking you seriously

you got me at E-1 on literally first day of the game thread being open

pooky have you not done any meaningful analysis on who is voting for what reason?