Mafiascum.net

probalby woulda made sense if you saw a vote in that post lol

I suppose it would have.

Why.... did you feel like...... compelled to ask Hoopla that though

i think hoopla's post was a tad bit defensive towards usernname, so i don't see why not?

it's a mysterious game u r playing, young dragon

not really actually

gypyx is scum

iamasuername is a good wagon for the moment, and hoopla's response to it was... off

i've a couple small townreads, which are based more on gut then anything else

and i've been open about everything so you should have no problem reading me at all

the way u called out hoopla kinda lowkey reminds me of this time when i caught scum d1 and he claimed something and another scum tried to suggest that mechanically even if scum#1 WAS scum it was strictly sub-optimal to elim him d1 because of his claim and i was like .... wiiiiild

anyway i digress
i have almost no opinion on hoopla defending username there

do you think it likely comes from scumpla towards scumsername?

In post 506, the worst wrote:do you think it likely comes from scumpla towards scumsername?

likely? maybe about even coming from town or scum

my thoughts went something like 'oh, what is this? let's poke it' wrt to username and hoopla

ico did you like my triangle

In post 508, Datisi wrote:ico did you like my triangle

i ehhh

well

oh man this is gonna be tough to explain but

i have avatars turned off, so i know maayyyybe 3 of em in your triangle?

In post 506, the worst wrote:the way u called out hoopla kinda lowkey reminds me of this time when i caught scum d1 and he claimed something and another scum tried to suggest that mechanically even if scum#1 WAS scum it was strictly sub-optimal to elim him d1 because of his claim and i was like .... wiiiiild

anyway i digress
i have almost no opinion on hoopla defending username there

do you think it likely comes from scumpla towards scumsername?

ok

wanna talk about scumyx?

In post 509, Iconeum wrote:i have avatars turned off

what

i shit you not

w h y

because reasons that I don't really wanna explain? they are absolutely game irrelevant

In post 510, Iconeum wrote:

In post 506, the worst wrote:the way u called out hoopla kinda lowkey reminds me of this time when i caught scum d1 and he claimed something and another scum tried to suggest that mechanically even if scum#1 WAS scum it was strictly sub-optimal to elim him d1 because of his claim and i was like .... wiiiiild

anyway i digress
i have almost no opinion on hoopla defending username there

do you think it likely comes from scumpla towards scumsername?

ok

wanna talk about scumyx?

not really, i'm fine with your assessment and don't think he's a very disputable slot rn

my next question would be "how do you live like that" but i won't ask

i will make a special triangle just for you

as soon as i crawl outta bed that is

In post 508, Datisi wrote:ico did you like my triangle

more importantly did you like my hexagon ):

Hexagons have an even number of sides >:[[[

Ico is ponging me but I can't explain exactly why yet

In post 369, Datisi wrote: @username, do you have any townreads or something? i think you've only talked about scumreads so far (other than s_s getting better i guess)

this is a correct observation. i have said nothing about townreads.

i have found myself feeling a lot of agreement with Umlaut's posts and i Do Not Get the wagon on him.

i like Hoopla. it doesn't feel like she's twisting the data to push any particular agenda to me.

i don't know if i'm entirely on board with the consensus that Clover's opening post was a town tell, but for some reason 386 makes me think he's town. like "i want to scumread X but i'm going to wait and see if anyone else does first" super reads like a scum thought process to me, but because he's straight up posting it in the thread, i don't think it can be? it's not like he's accidentally letting a mask slip and revealing his nefarious ways, he's openly admitting to them like it's no big deal.

Datisi and the worst both feel like they are genuinely trying to discern alignments here also.

those are the people i feel like i have more than a null read on.

In post 467, the worst wrote:

In post 460, Grumpy Cat wrote:imusername's takes are too selective. Like, he's taking special care to criticise very specific things which he thinks look good to poke at or are reasonable to. The lack of ~feels~ or big picture takes is generally scum-indicative.

he's also, liek, ignoring everything that strikes me as interesting & ignoring ppl trying to sort him which is like..

what interesting things do you think i'm ignoring? i will happily provide commentary on up to three (3) interesting things of your choice.

In post 519, Grumpy Cat wrote:Ico is ponging me but I can't explain exactly why yet

which post(s)?

In post 517, the worst wrote:

In post 508, Datisi wrote:ico did you like my triangle

more importantly did you like my hexagon ):

still haven't turned on avatars...

I'm the cat

In post 523, Grumpy Cat wrote:I'm the cat

Rawr!