Mafiascum.net

lol if that worked then im DEAD

In post 500, Albert B. Rampage wrote:lol if that worked then im DEAD

Oh oops.

Rip bad memory.

Oh well we will see if it’s a thing tomorrow but doubt it.

HURT: No one

Who do you wanna Vig ABR?

In post 497, Jake The Wolfie wrote:

samantha97 (3):

Galron, Albert B. Rampage, MathBlade
[/area]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

This is so fucking rich that I was right and ABR wasted so much time on an obvious mod error.

God damn, I need to bask in the glory of my being right.

Prodge post... I honestly don't get the push on samantha

In this game literally anything can be a clue.

Never ever assume anything is a simple post.

Grand idea is not meant to be balanced, there’s some give and take and swingy.

It’s meant to be fun. Trust me even the smallest person can pack a punch in an unexpected way.

In post 503, TemporalLich wrote:Prodge post... I honestly don't get the push on samantha

Don’t worry you’re probably scum with Sam.

In post 506, MathBlade wrote:

In post 503, TemporalLich wrote:Prodge post... I honestly don't get the push on samantha

Don’t worry you’re probably scum with Sam.

Instead of a basic explanation you say I am associated with sam?

Do you really think Sam is openwolfing that bad?

In post 507, TemporalLich wrote:

In post 506, MathBlade wrote:

In post 503, TemporalLich wrote:Prodge post... I honestly don't get the push on samantha

Don’t worry you’re probably scum with Sam.

Instead of a basic explanation you say I am associated with sam?

Do you really think Sam is openwolfing that bad?

I think you are. ABR scumreads Sam. And the fact you commented trying to say the push on Sam doesn’t make sense instead of pushing who you do scumread despite you being a major wagon says a lot.

I don't have a push because I already pushed DT to the limit... if nobody thinks DT is scum for fakeclaiming results on PJ then there is nothing for me to help that without any new content from DT

and I'm not a major wagon anymore so you might be scum with DT

also ABR just wants to lim sam to lim sam... no real reason behind it as 418 is the best I saw... and that's a terrible reason to SR someone for thinking that gambits and fakeclaims harm the town

a weak confirmation does not mean we treat ABR as a god who can do no scummy thing and everything ABR does is towny

I'm actually willing to bet, if ABR flips Impostor you are an Impostor as well MB

In post 513, TemporalLich wrote:I'm actually willing to bet, if ABR flips Impostor you are an Impostor as well MB

Are you saying you have a guess of scum team of DT, ABR and DT?

Let's consolidate these ideas so we can read them.

In post 512, TemporalLich wrote:a weak confirmation does not mean we treat ABR as a god who can do no scummy thing and everything ABR does is towny

VOTE: Temporal Lich

Weak by definition is a confirmation of ones alignment.

If someone weak visits someone not weak that means anything they do is of the same alignment.

That is how weak works.

Now why are you all of a sudden bringing up weak?

This is an imho scumslip of huge proportions.

In post 513, TemporalLich wrote:I'm actually willing to bet, if ABR flips Impostor you are an Impostor as well MB

I am pretty sure you’d lose in Vegas so hard.

In post 515, MathBlade wrote:

In post 512, TemporalLich wrote:a weak confirmation does not mean we treat ABR as a god who can do no scummy thing and everything ABR does is towny

VOTE: Temporal Lich

Weak by definition is a confirmation of ones alignment.

If someone weak visits someone not weak that means anything they do is of the same alignment.

That is how weak works.

Now why are you all of a sudden bringing up weak?

This is an imho scumslip of huge proportions.

I didn't think he was claiming a weak role confirmed ABR, personally. We haven't even had a night part of this game to get a weak claim to confirm.

I guess I'm just confused by this response.

In post 514, ManWithNoName wrote:

In post 513, TemporalLich wrote:I'm actually willing to bet, if ABR flips Impostor you are an Impostor as well MB

Are you saying you have a guess of scum team of DT, ABR and DT?

Let's consolidate these ideas so we can read them.

I'm saying MathBlade is scum with either ABR or DT, and I'm 50% sure that's an exclusive or.

That being said, the most valuable info push is DT right now, as a green DT bodes poorly for ABR. If MB flips town then the whole associative V-shape falls apart.

pedit: you have to be trolling right? 183 and 185 is a confirmation of ABR's role (which is Sweetheart, not Weak), which in turn is a weak confirmation of ABR's alignment (it is definitely possible for Sweetheart to appear as non-town via alignment-forcing rerolls or other shenanigans). It would be preposterous to assume ABR is actually Weak, and such a thing can't be confirmed without ABR dying or a role cop existing.

In post 517, ManWithNoName wrote:

In post 515, MathBlade wrote:

In post 512, TemporalLich wrote:a weak confirmation does not mean we treat ABR as a god who can do no scummy thing and everything ABR does is towny

VOTE: Temporal Lich

Weak by definition is a confirmation of ones alignment.

If someone weak visits someone not weak that means anything they do is of the same alignment.

That is how weak works.

Now why are you all of a sudden bringing up weak?

This is an imho scumslip of huge proportions.

I didn't think he was claiming a weak role confirmed ABR, personally. We haven't even had a night part of this game to get a weak claim to confirm.

I guess I'm just confused by this response.

Look at exclusively MY ISO.

besides, assuming PJ is third-party ABR is confirmed to be weak

In post 518, TemporalLich wrote:

In post 514, ManWithNoName wrote:

In post 513, TemporalLich wrote:I'm actually willing to bet, if ABR flips Impostor you are an Impostor as well MB

Are you saying you have a guess of scum team of DT, ABR and DT?

Let's consolidate these ideas so we can read them.

I'm saying MathBlade is scum with either ABR or DT, and I'm 50% sure that's an exclusive or.

That being said, the most valuable info push is DT right now, as a green DT bodes poorly for ABR. If MB flips town then the whole associative V-shape falls apart.

pedit: you have to be trolling right? 183 and 185 is a confirmation of ABR's role (which is Sweetheart, not Weak), which in turn is a weak confirmation of ABR's alignment (it is definitely possible for Sweetheart to appear as non-town via alignment-forcing rerolls or other shenanigans). It would be preposterous to assume ABR is actually Weak, and such a thing can't be confirmed without ABR dying or a role cop existing.

Correct.

It would be preposterous to assume ABR is weak.

That’s not what I am doing.

In post 519, MathBlade wrote:

In post 517, ManWithNoName wrote:

In post 515, MathBlade wrote:

In post 512, TemporalLich wrote:a weak confirmation does not mean we treat ABR as a god who can do no scummy thing and everything ABR does is towny

VOTE: Temporal Lich

Weak by definition is a confirmation of ones alignment.

If someone weak visits someone not weak that means anything they do is of the same alignment.

That is how weak works.

Now why are you all of a sudden bringing up weak?

This is an imho scumslip of huge proportions.

I didn't think he was claiming a weak role confirmed ABR, personally. We haven't even had a night part of this game to get a weak claim to confirm.

I guess I'm just confused by this response.

Look at exclusively MY ISO.

I still don't get it.

Sounds like a you problem then.

Yeah, probably is at this point. I'm just going to keep being the dumb friend I ask for clarification for.

I mean, I have plenty of friends.