Mafiascum.net

In post 453, MathBlade wrote:

In post 452, DkKoba wrote:

In post 450, MathBlade wrote:https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... ve_Lurking

Yes. It is. Your questions are fundamentally irrelevant to scumhunting as they contain nothing to read you from. Definitionally this is active lurking.

Why do you think this push is in bad faith?

because my questions are most definitely not irrelevant to scumhunting LMFAO

Can you explain how its irrelevant to scumhunting and Ill slam dunk u right after cause i know ur talking out your ass right now lol.

In post 451, SirCakez wrote:

In post 446, MathBlade wrote:What doesn’t make sense to you?
You haven’t played with me in a while, and when we last played together I was known (and still am known) to be a good scum player.
This should make you naturally suspicious of me. The drive by ping without specifying town or scum ping, doesn’t reflect that.
Therefore something is off with you.

This is just not how I play
I start off neutral from people I have not played with in a long time, same as I would with someone I hadn't played with before

It’s odd. Throwing away what you know about a person doesn’t jive to me.

again this is just not how I play

I actually think MB's vomit here is more likely town atm
you're not gonna win an argument with him anyways
I don't want to go down this hole anyways

VOTE: pink ball
*poke*

In post 497, MathBlade wrote:

In post 489, DkKoba wrote:I questioned PB bc I wanted to get their mindset on how they arrived at that read and u immediately came at me for "active lurking" . Which i think is hilarious and horribly wrong

That’d be good if you actually did that. And yes you were active lurking and in a lot of ways still are. Blatantly not reading and just not doing anything.

The closest you’ve come is asking me why PB is town to me.

In post 429, DkKoba wrote:

In post 425, Pink Ball wrote:Eyes on DK and peta, both could be scum for different, unrelated reasoning

What reasoning would that be?

its extremely easy to own people when they're shitpushing u bc their logic never holds up and its satisfying everytime lmfao

i got the receipts everytime

In post 501, DkKoba wrote:

In post 497, MathBlade wrote:

In post 489, DkKoba wrote:I questioned PB bc I wanted to get their mindset on how they arrived at that read and u immediately came at me for "active lurking" . Which i think is hilarious and horribly wrong

That’d be good if you actually did that. And yes you were active lurking and in a lot of ways still are. Blatantly not reading and just not doing anything.

The closest you’ve come is asking me why PB is town to me.

In post 429, DkKoba wrote:

In post 425, Pink Ball wrote:Eyes on DK and peta, both could be scum for different, unrelated reasoning

What reasoning would that be?

Whelp I should eat my own words. I missed that post.

VOTE: Unvote

VOTE: Sircakez

Stop pushing that old meta SirCakez.

what meta lol
I didn't mention meta at all

You can’t very well say you’re treating me as neutral then at the same time shade me as bad.

Which is it?

In post 500, SirCakez wrote:

In post 453, MathBlade wrote:

In post 452, DkKoba wrote:

In post 450, MathBlade wrote:https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... ve_Lurking

Yes. It is. Your questions are fundamentally irrelevant to scumhunting as they contain nothing to read you from. Definitionally this is active lurking.

Why do you think this push is in bad faith?

because my questions are most definitely not irrelevant to scumhunting LMFAO

Can you explain how its irrelevant to scumhunting and Ill slam dunk u right after cause i know ur talking out your ass right now lol.

In post 451, SirCakez wrote:

In post 446, MathBlade wrote:What doesn’t make sense to you?
You haven’t played with me in a while, and when we last played together I was known (and still am known) to be a good scum player.
This should make you naturally suspicious of me. The drive by ping without specifying town or scum ping, doesn’t reflect that.
Therefore something is off with you.

This is just not how I play
I start off neutral from people I have not played with in a long time, same as I would with someone I hadn't played with before

It’s odd. Throwing away what you know about a person doesn’t jive to me.

again this is just not how I play

I actually think MB's vomit here is more likely town atm
you're not gonna win an argument with him anyways
I don't want to go down this hole anyways

VOTE: pink ball
*poke*

^^ This here.

You’re implying I am bad and won’t win an argument which is a meta read.

If I am a neutral/no read then you can’t have any predispositions at all.

This is suspect.

what is wrong with using meta to read ppl like thats literally half the game lol

In post 508, DkKoba wrote:what is wrong with using meta to read ppl like thats literally half the game lol

It’s a good thing to use meta.

It’s a bad thing to say you won’t use meta, like SirCakez said before about me, and then come back and shade me using meta.

In post 451, SirCakez wrote:

In post 446, MathBlade wrote:What doesn’t make sense to you?
You haven’t played with me in a while, and when we last played together I was known (and still am known) to be a good scum player.
This should make you naturally suspicious of me. The drive by ping without specifying town or scum ping, doesn’t reflect that.
Therefore something is off with you.

This is just not how I play
I start off neutral from people I have not played with in a long time, same as I would with someone I hadn't played with before

Here he says he is starting off neutral with me because we haven’t played together in a long time.

Neutral includes throwing out meta.

If he’s using old meta he’s not really keeping neutral.

Therefore if he’s not keeping neutral he’d be inherently suspicious of me (which he wasn’t)
Or he would be sticking neutral (which he didn’t when he said you aren’t going to win an argument)

Which I do respond to direct evidence or “Hey you’re wrong here”.

Between me missing a post and DV thinking you may be town I backed off.

Here SirCakez is being contradictory and I want to know why. The motivation may be town or scum motivated but exploring the contradiction helps.

when i read math's latest post my brain has trouble parsing and i think im just going to ignore that slot for the sake of my brain not shutting down.


anyways I'm waiting on DV's reaction to my vote on them and will be chilling out

I’m at work right now and have only seen that last post, so I know you voted me without actually seeing the vote oops

i forgot about this game

koba how have you not solved it yet?

In post 513, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i forgot about this game

koba how have you not solved it yet?

because my favorite bear wasnt here

In post 512, DeasVail wrote:I’m at work right now and have only seen that last post, so I know you voted me without actually seeing the vote oops

i can still get a good old gth response tho no? (:

o wow look at this blatant pockit attempt

VOTE: koba

pooky u rolled mafia didnt u ):

In post 516, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:o wow look at this blatant pockit attempt

VOTE: koba

What do you make of the game previously?

i was sad i was shot dead b4 i could catch swampperson

In post 517, DkKoba wrote:pooky u rolled mafia didnt u ):

it'd be lit if i was mafia

true story

In post 421, MathBlade wrote:

In post 420, DkKoba wrote:VOTE: mathblade

giving out townreads for free?

On the contrary.

DV noticed what I had. The statement above is too particular and laser focused. It had a caveat of Bingle being town and PB being town.

It hints at Bingle being scum and PB being town how it was written.

I don’t give out reads for free. That’s not how I roll and I don’t know what to make of you implying I am.

It really doesn't. There's a pundit square here:

If we're both scum, it's against my interests to vote PB.
If we're unaligned, it's for my interests to vote PB.
If we're both town, limming PB will somehow magically make me win.

Obviously voting PB is optimal.

I'm not arguing with mathblade

btw we should have a town parent claim at EoD and decide a lim so we avoid outting town child. if you're child and u get chosen by the town parent just stfu and take the lim bc u give us a free lim.

free scum lim*