Mafiascum.net

pagetop

In post 499, shellyc wrote:geraint, are you a very vote-oriented player?

yes. they are actual points of information and all we have to go on. I like seeing what people actually do and their reasoning to get there. I like seeing if their votes follow a logical progression or are plucked out of thin ar. I dislike people who use other people's reasoning to jump onto a wagon.

later in the game there is more info than just votes, but by then you can build up a picture of someone's vote history.

elimination

1. Titus [0]:

2. Andresvmb [2]:

geraintm#33, JohnnyFarrar#232

3. unwnd [1]:

shellyc#292

4. Flavor Leaf [3]:

nopointinactingup#293, unwnd#339, Dunnstral#343

5. Hank Spankems [0]:

6. shellyc [1]:

Titus#172

7. PlusJOYED [0]:

8. Not_Mafia [2]:

Hank Spankems#69, PlusJOYED#365

9. JohnnyFarrar [0]:

10. geraintm [0]:

11. TheFuzzyLogic99 [0]:

12. Dunnstral [2]:

Flavor Leaf#381, Andresvmb#403

13. nopointinactingup [1]:

Not_Mafia#157

no elimination [0]:

Not Voting [1]:

TheFuzzyLogic99

mod notes

~Reminder that I will not process votes that are even remotely ambiguous to me

In post 503, Titus wrote:VOTE: Flavor Leaf

fairly sure titus is top of my list of scummiest people in the game.

In post 503, Titus wrote:VOTE: Flavor Leaf

Titus I might understand the context behind this, but do you have any reasoning you want to share for the vote?

In post 503, Titus wrote:VOTE: Flavor Leaf

Titus I might understand the context behind this, but do you have any reasoning you want to share for the vote?

Ugh I hate the double post. Apologies.

In post 278, Andresvmb wrote:@Titus, can you walk me through your vote on shellyc? I’m trying to figure out if there’s anything I’m missing.

@Titus I’m also still waiting on this.

@Not_Mafia any reason for the vote?

I think he's scummy

I should have expected that response.

I’m not seeing it, so I’m trying to get more than justifications based on the self-vote play. Flavor clearly posted reads - anything that raised some flags from that?

^that’s an open question to anybody on the wagon.

In post 450, Flavor Leaf wrote:Everytime Shelly posts, I feel like they're pocketing me now.

she has that effect

Clearly not everybody on the Flavor wagon is Scum. There’s something fascinating about nopoint + Dunn + unwnd all agreeing that this vote makes sense based on how the beginning of the day played out. Titus has been largely absent so I don’t really read too much into that vote to be totally honest (it could be Scum piling on, particularly if Flavor is Town, but it could easily be Town that is going through the motions too), and Not_Mafia will do their thing (I’m not getting the same positive vibes as last game so I don’t know if Not_Mafia is Town, but the reputation is there for a reason). So what’s going on?

In post 474, shellyc wrote:

Dayvig: unwnd

no silly you've got it backwards
you're supposed to let them answer then shoot

sorry i've been inactive, energy levels are low since I started showing covid symptoms last weekend. I'll survive but still I just wanna sleep all day
blurgh
I still think johny and not_mafia are the scummiest so far having caught up, with not_mafia being the scummiest given the recent vote.

In post 505, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 503, Titus wrote:VOTE: Flavor Leaf

Titus I might understand the context behind this, but do you have any reasoning you want to share for the vote?

No. I am still in RVS. I haven't read at all and want to get wagons going. Since rationing my meds, my reads have gotten worse too so I am letting others lead.

Everyone's vote on me is essentially naked "he scummy"

F-2, should I claim?

In post 519, Flavor Leaf wrote:Everyone's vote on me is essentially naked "he scummy"

F-2, should I claim?

You should wait.

In post 518, Titus wrote:

In post 505, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 503, Titus wrote:VOTE: Flavor Leaf

Titus I might understand the context behind this, but do you have any reasoning you want to share for the vote?

No. I am still in RVS. I haven't read at all and want to get wagons going. Since rationing my meds, my reads have gotten worse too so I am letting others lead.

Claiming to still be treating the game as if it were in RVS when you’re pushing the top wagon closer to execution and there’s this many pages of content seems rather difficult to believe wouldn’t you agree? If you haven’t read, why would you put such a dangerous vote down? I’m struggling to understand the logic here.

Dunn, Unwnd, Not Mafia, and Nopoint all have wagons that aren’t able to gain momentum.

There is scum in there.

In post 522, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 518, Titus wrote:

In post 505, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 503, Titus wrote:VOTE: Flavor Leaf

Titus I might understand the context behind this, but do you have any reasoning you want to share for the vote?

No. I am still in RVS. I haven't read at all and want to get wagons going. Since rationing my meds, my reads have gotten worse too so I am letting others lead.

Claiming to still be treating the game as if it were in RVS when you’re pushing the top wagon closer to execution and there’s this many pages of content seems rather difficult to believe wouldn’t you agree? If you haven’t read, why would you put such a dangerous vote down? I’m struggling to understand the logic here.

I haven't read any of the content due to being ill and modding requiring most of my attention. If you don't believe that, then I don't know what to do as it's true.

I don't feel my vote is dangerous. L minus 3 is hardly dangerous. It does serve to get reactions though.