Page 21 of 177

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 8:25 pm
by osuka
DADDY

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 8:25 pm
by osuka
In post 499, PawnsGambit wrote:
In post 489, osuka wrote:
In post 469, PawnsGambit wrote:It's not so much that Robert's reads were serious, it's how unconcerned he is with making friends.
for the millionth time on this page: what the fuck?????

why is being not concerned with making friends a reason to scumread someone?
Being overly antagonistic usually leads to getting yourself eliminated rather than your scumreads.
if you need evidence contrary to this shit tier theory, literally just look at any of my past games

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 8:29 pm
by PawnsGambit
In post 501, osuka wrote:
In post 499, PawnsGambit wrote:
In post 489, osuka wrote:
In post 469, PawnsGambit wrote:It's not so much that Robert's reads were serious, it's how unconcerned he is with making friends.
for the millionth time on this page: what the fuck?????

why is being not concerned with making friends a reason to scumread someone?
Being overly antagonistic usually leads to getting yourself eliminated rather than your scumreads.
if you need evidence contrary to this shit tier theory, literally just look at any of my past games
Maybe you have a endearment towards others you're not aware of.

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 8:32 pm
by PawnsGambit
However, it does look like you got eliminated on day 2 for being "annoying" in boardgames.

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 8:52 pm
by osuka
In post 502, PawnsGambit wrote:
In post 501, osuka wrote:
In post 499, PawnsGambit wrote:
In post 489, osuka wrote:
In post 469, PawnsGambit wrote:It's not so much that Robert's reads were serious, it's how unconcerned he is with making friends.
for the millionth time on this page: what the fuck?????

why is being not concerned with making friends a reason to scumread someone?
Being overly antagonistic usually leads to getting yourself eliminated rather than your scumreads.
if you need evidence contrary to this shit tier theory, literally just look at any of my past games
Maybe you have a endearment towards others you're not aware of.
i can assure you i do not and i am in fact deeply annoyed by posts like these, which are somehow simultaneously completely devoid of game advancing content and exceptionally stupid

Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 8:52 pm
by osuka
In post 503, PawnsGambit wrote:However, it does look like you got eliminated on day 2 for being "annoying" in boardgames.
even assuming that’s true, that’s one of how many games i’ve played?

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 2:55 am
by PawnsGambit
Sorry to annoy you.

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:35 am
by Anya
did insidious just ignore the fact he ever voted me or i voted him and go on to flay pawniard?

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:36 am
by Anya
don't want a confrontation in the pokemon stadium? would rather just watch the poor pawniard from the stands

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:37 am
by Anya
In post 481, osuka wrote:
In post 448, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: Andresvmb

i think you should change your definition of the word defending tho
????????????
????????????????????????

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:41 am
by Anya
In post 459, Robert M Hunter wrote:Dear Lemons,

Regarding osuka, I certainly have no reason to think they are scum at the moment, so they are a default town read. It's as simple as that. Like any default read, it is open to be revisited if I hear them squeak. In the meantime, I am enjoying their posts.

You could be right about Pawn, and I could be wrong. You may have a point with the part about "wanting to look confident but scared to overcommit."

I actually forget why I read VFB as town, but I iso'd everyone in alphabetical order so I read all his posts and made that conclusion. I am bit sleepy right now but I'll be glad to check again tomorrow.
i think this hunter is town for the last paragraph

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:51 am
by osuka
what the fuck is going on here?

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:52 am
by osuka
In post 509, Anya wrote:
In post 481, osuka wrote:
In post 448, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: Andresvmb

i think you should change your definition of the word defending tho
????????????
????????????????????????
i hope you’re just catching up and replying as you go. if you are, don’t read the rest of this message

if you’re not: learn to fucking read, i had a whole conversation with std about this

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:53 am
by osuka
In post 510, Anya wrote:
In post 459, Robert M Hunter wrote:Dear Lemons,

Regarding osuka, I certainly have no reason to think they are scum at the moment, so they are a default town read. It's as simple as that. Like any default read, it is open to be revisited if I hear them squeak. In the meantime, I am enjoying their posts.

You could be right about Pawn, and I could be wrong. You may have a point with the part about "wanting to look confident but scared to overcommit."

I actually forget why I read VFB as town, but I iso'd everyone in alphabetical order so I read all his posts and made that conclusion. I am bit sleepy right now but I'll be glad to check again tomorrow.
i think this hunter is town for the last paragraph
why on earth does the last paragraph make him town?

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:04 am
by Anya
In post 512, osuka wrote:
In post 509, Anya wrote:
In post 481, osuka wrote:
In post 448, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: Andresvmb

i think you should change your definition of the word defending tho
????????????
????????????????????????
i hope you’re just catching up and replying as you go. if you are, don’t read the rest of this message

if you’re not: learn to fucking read, i had a whole conversation with std about this
????????????????????????????????????????????????

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:05 am
by Anya
it makes him town because a wolf would just make up a reason and not actually have one from earlier while town might've had and forgotten one

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:15 am
by Datisi
prodding haschel cedricson.

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:17 am
by InsidiousLemons
In post 507, Anya wrote:did insidious just ignore the fact he ever voted me or i voted him and go on to flay pawniard?
nope, i addressed your vote on me in . pawns' (continued) hostility and caginess about sharing his opinions/naming names is much more scummy to me than a possible diversion tactic early D1. would still like to know what you thought you were accomplishing, though

i agree with your point in that an "i forgot" seems slightly more likely to come from town in this scenario than scum, but not by a lot. i don't think that alone would be enough for me to base a townread off of.

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:19 am
by Anya
oh ok

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:22 am
by Anya
VOTE: Haschel

would also vote for Andres

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:26 am
by Andresvmb
In post 519, Anya wrote:VOTE: Haschel

would also vote for Andres
Then do it. Your vote for Haschel is wasted since they’re getting prodded and there’s not much momentum there.

Like in all honesty I would rather get executed quickly than spend a whole lot of time re-reading this game when I’m getting pushed for entirely bullshit reasons.

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:26 am
by Anya
actually i wouldn't vote for Andres and it's outrageous that you would even suggest that of me

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:29 am
by Andresvmb
Like c’mon Asteria has apparently claimed that I was ignoring them when I didn’t respond to them because I literally wasn’t around this game. And they highlighted like my first post which was mostly a joke. There’s no real scum hunting there it’s just gibberish.

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:30 am
by Anya
your frustrated reaction and asking to be voted feels like town to me

what did Asterus do

Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:32 am
by Andresvmb
In post 449, Robert M Hunter wrote:SCUMMY RODENTS
Andante
Andresvmb
Haschel Cedricson
Salsabil Faria
Green Crayons
And why am I here exactly? That whole post has no words for me, yet I’m not Null or anything but amongst the potential Scum. Not surprising I guess.