Mafiascum.net

In post 319, TemporalLich wrote:

VC 2.3

Cook

(5)

- SirCakez, Ircher, Guillotina, Raya36, samantha97

[EXILED!]

Ircher (1) - Titus

Not voting: Cook, lendunistus, Dunnstral, KidAmn

With 10 alive it takes at least 5 to exile.

Day 2 will end in (expired on 2021-05-20 13:30:00) or when an exile is reached.

In post 393, TemporalLich wrote:

VC 3.2

Dunnstral

(4)

- Titus, Guillotina, Raya36, samantha97

[EXILED!]

Not voting: lendunistus, Dunnstral, KidAmn

With 7 alive it takes at least 3.5 to exile.

Day 3 will end in (expired on 2021-05-22 22:30:00) or when an exile is reached.

In post 458, TemporalLich wrote:

VC 4.2

Guillotina

(3)

- Titus, KidAmn, Raya36

[EXILED!]

Titus (1) - Guillotina [E-2]

Not voting: lendunistus

With 5 alive it takes at least 2.5 to exile.

Day 4 will end in (expired on 2021-05-25 00:00:00) or when an exile is reached.

Raya and or Raya plus Sam quickhammered every day minus day 1 where Inori beat me to it.

Werewolf PT has been released.

lol.

In post 469, Guillotina wrote:Town only misyeeted once and still loss. Lol

Bastard! Gg

Flea and I are not considered correct yeets lol. but whatever.

I was happy to townside, honestly.

Nora not responding to Ice Cream kinda told me that she wasn't town though but ya know I needed to stump *someone* first....


oh while i'm here.

I AM FREAKING INSULTED YA'LL THINK MY 3P PLAY IS SO BAD AS TO BE ABLE TO READ MY TARGET FROM D1. I know better and know to slow play that if anything
Side note why'd you think cakey was my RVS lol

I think the town's only viable strategy was trying to push Titus lol

Who the fuck killed me?!

In post 0, TemporalLich wrote:Raya36, Mafia Monk, survives and wins

Did you kill me Raya?
I trusted you

Sammyantha tried cleaning your body after murdering you.

In post 507, VFP wrote:

In post 0, TemporalLich wrote:Raya36, Mafia Monk, survives and wins

Did you kill me Raya?
I trusted you

I mean... technically not me

Alien PT
Apparition PT

more PTs lol

In post 504, Flea The Magician wrote:I was happy to townside, honestly.

Nora not responding to Ice Cream kinda told me that she wasn't town though but ya know I needed to stump *someone* first....


oh while i'm here.

I AM FREAKING INSULTED YA'LL THINK MY 3P PLAY IS SO BAD AS TO BE ABLE TO READ MY TARGET FROM D1. I know better and know to slow play that if anything
Side note why'd you think cakey was my RVS lol

I only pushed this because it benefitted me. If I was your target, I could coast on that until I had the numbers to lock survival in.

I didn't pay attention, but Titus win was actually inevitable a day earlier than the game was called, I think. Titus outing both teams means neither team can vote Titus or they lose, and so "Titus and friends" faction has majority.

Of course, Titus didn't act on that because :lolroles: could have screwed her, but :shrug:.

I actually was not allowed to claim scum and my partner is X because that's a bannable offense or I may have.

In post 514, Titus wrote:I actually was not allowed to claim scum and my partner is X because that's a bannable offense or I may have.

TLich asked me about that. If there is a specific reason it's not game throwing it's not a bannable offense afaik, it's just that 90% of the time outing your team is gamethrowing. In this particular circumstance I can almost guarantee you wouldn't be banned as it was actually mechanically optimal in the absence of a vig. OTOH, your play was playing around a vig or some other shenanigans with is arguably a better idea.

The relevant rules are:

mith wrote:

Mafia Rules

1. Play to win the game.
   In some cases, actions taken with the intent of ruining a game may result in further action against the user, such as a limitation on the number of games that user can play, or a temporary or permanent ban. Any player that is force-replaced for breaking site rules may not "replace back in" to those games after the ban is over.

In post 1, TemporalLich wrote:-Pretending to break the rules will be treated similarly as actually breaking the rules.

Clearly you would have been playing to win, so there wouldn't be a breakage of the rule in the first place. I may have been a little unclear in my response to TLich, though, so if he said otherwise that's on me for being obtuse.

DoAR II will likely be:

A 17p Large Theme (or floating size Large Theme if the listmod allows it)
Using the XU, not the DoAR proper (the DoAR proper does have potential but I'm considering retconning the doublescum alignments to be Traitors)
With a modified minimum as this game might not have been proper Mafia - 2 co-aligned groupscum and more town than groupscum
Ran Micc-style i.e. pick from three games worth of cards and the mod picks the most balanced or fun of the three.

i'd recommend floating as it can be hard to fill a grand idea-esque large theme

I'd want more roles here before I consider DoAR II: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=86320

if not I'll just do Grandest Idea instead (micc-style if you want that) when I feel more open

This game was mainly unbalanced by the massive amount of non-town to town, mainly the town already starting with a minority, and 2 groupscum factions that were really one but could accidentally crossfire on itself.

Like, bascially it would never crossfire on itself as long as titus knew what they were doing.

I am considering a tighter requirement (there needs to be more town than groupscum) with Micc-style picks for the next GIM-like I run

I tried to set the bar at "proper Mafia game" - but an uninformed majority arguably isn't a majority if they are outnumbered by total groupscum in a multiball game