Mafiascum.net

In post 379, Titus wrote:It is but I'm not going to out the modifier to ensure that cw has to come up with the answer on their own.

In post 380, cw357 wrote:town loyal doctor

In post 381, cw357 wrote:im a doctor but doc action only works if i target town

In post 382, T3 wrote:This is town.

In post 383, Titus wrote:Loyal is the correct modifier.

In post 419, cw357 wrote:ill have to check Jessica Rabbit's meta
like when i played my first game i talked kind of like that with convoluted and overly formal language

but if jessica's experienced than it becomes a little bit more meh or sus (see my wonderful descriptive vocabulary )

i should be able to be a little more active from here out because school is over bt

In post 421, cw357 wrote:

In post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.

I mean hello everyone.

o yea i forgot about this

In post 163, excallq wrote:

In post 152, DrippingGoofball wrote:Having said that, the traitor speculation is complete garbage, why can't they just straight up say I'm scum instead of this roundabout traitor BS?

Cuz scum are more likely to try not to draw so much attention to themselves day one whereas townies are more likely to not call for policy eliminations also day one?

honestly this is wifom
like town can use it too though so it's nai in my book

In post 51, excallq wrote:I have no self-awareness at all, scummy or otherwise.

In post 43, Rannygazoo wrote:Is this scummy self-awareness too?

In post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.

I mean hello everyone.

ok i actually called this out earlier but shouldn't u have towny self-awareness, having no self-awareness sounds like scum trying to obscure their alignment

In post 412, excallq wrote:

In post 385, Jessica Rabbit wrote:

In post 373, excallq wrote:

In post 365, Jessica Rabbit wrote:

In post 348, excallq wrote:Random early (probably more than half wrong) reads on some folks.

cw: Can't really get a sense of whether or not the inactivity is tactical but the vote for me feels like it was a "safe" one in that he could just point to my earlier less-than-supremely-serious posts without having to provide much in the way of explanation or logic behind the vote, and since there wasn't any momentum behind eliminating me it wouldn't garner so much attention.

T3: Leaning towards believing the roleclaim

Jessica Rabbit: Feels like she's trying to project helpful

Ranny: Think he's been happier just getting in minor spats since attention has shifted to DGB and CW. Keeping my vote on him.

Roden: Kind of agreed with whoever said the tiff with Ranny seemed staged but he's been feeling more town lately.

DGB: Has been pushing back in a lot of directions and kinda flailing. To me it reads more purely aggressive than overtly scummy but I don't have a read on him as town either.

Anyone I didn't list I don't have a solid read on at all (insofar as any of these are remotely solid)

I’m not a fan of this. If your take on me is that I’m being helpful then where is the shade coming from? It’s akin to claiming a player who is very clearly doing townie things is trying to look like they are but not really.

I said my read on you was that you were trying to project the image of being helpful. This is different from and independent of actually being helpful.

The only thing I actually don’t hate about these posts is your take on T3. Why because these takes with the sole exception of the T3 read don’t make a lot of sense as a whole.

Considering that one of the “spats” Ranny got into was with me, why would you shade both of us here? It seems really clear that you’re scumreading Ranny and don’t think we’re aligned, so I don’t understand the thought process behind any of it besides the T3 thing.

I said nothing about you being aligned with Ranny or not. Curious why it seems to clear to you think I have that opinion.

Yes and it’s an extremely bizarre take. It looks like you want to shade me without any basis that makes any sense. What does that even mean? How is it even possible to “project helpfulness” and not actually be helpful? Why are you curious? you were shading both of us.

The bizarre takes are that me getting vaguely evil whiffs off two people means I am positively asserting those two are aligned and that stating you're trying to project helpfulness is some unfathomable concept.

Is there a language barrier? You come off like you're trying to feign being an active pro-town scum-hunter but that you aren't actually helping at all and just stirring up smoke. Which is exactly what you're doing.

hmm
this interaction didn't sound wolf/wolf but i think one of them's scum so:
there's ur garbage interactions read from cw for 6/11/21
seriously though I'm probably going to be voting for one of them and I'll suggest that we do the whole vig/doc thing on whoever isn't hanged if we don't hit scum

In post 502, Umlaut wrote:

Seeking a replacement for excallq.

In post 506, Jessica Rabbit wrote:

Can we get an extension in that case?

In post 463, excallq wrote:

In post 457, Roden wrote:

In post 449, excallq wrote:

In post 447, Roden wrote:Then vote me and get a wagon going. See if you can get me to reveal if I have a PR or not. If you're not intent on doing this, then I'm comfortable in believing you just want to plant seeds for Day 2.

What an absurd demand. Why would I try to get people to vote for you if I think you and Ranny are scum buddies and people (myself included) are already voting for Ranny?

You're also blatantly trying to get around the fact you fucked up with the scum vs scum claim. If you could honestly deny it, a townie absolutely would by now. Or at the very least, a townie would admit they made a mistake. Why do you keep trying to talk around it?

And this is just a stream of revisionist BS based on the fact that T3 wasn't willing to outright accuse you on like the fourth page.

So you're admitting you're just setting up a Day 2 elim then. Gotcha.

And there's nothing revisionist on my end. You made a claim, got factually proven wrong, and now you're scrambling to justify it while refusing to admit you made a mistake. If you're town, your ego is gonna cost us the game.

Nothing but semantic games from you. I agreed with the post where T3 said you and Ranny seemed scummy. You're now claiming that's a lie on my part cuz in a later post T3 wouldn't commit to an accusation.

Now you're claiming I'm "planting seeds" because I'm not trying to start a wagon against the one of the two people I think are scum that doesn't have any votes on them now.

And then you're throwing out that last line cuz you know I am town and you're afraid you've overcommitted and will start getting attention starting Day 2.

In post 442, Roden wrote:

If I wasn't so tunneled on DGB right now, and if I was more liable to make OMGUS votes, I'd probably jump on the Excall wagon

. His line of posts doesn't look good and relies on a situation he essentially made up in his head to make work.

If you think I'm scum buddies with Ranny, I'd rather you just make a case than plant seeds for Day 2.

Rannygazoo wrote:That’s me, perpetual exasperated townie

I genuinely do believe this

In post 456, Jessica Rabbit wrote:

In post 447, Roden wrote:Then vote me and get a wagon going. See if you can get me to reveal if I have a PR or not. If you're not intent on doing this, then I'm comfortable in believing you just want to plant seeds for Day 2.

You're also blatantly trying to get around the fact you fucked up with the scum vs scum claim. If you could honestly deny it, a townie absolutely would by now. Or at the very least, a townie would admit they made a mistake. Why do you keep trying to talk around it?

Yeah, their recent posts seemed to be very superficial takes and I agree with the planting seeds thing. I think they don’t actually believe any of the nonsence they’ve been spewing. They only shaded me AFTER I expressed suspicions on them and when confronted they just double downed on their nonsense shade and made zero attempt to explain it.

I think I feel good with my vote.

In post 473, Titus wrote:

In post 416, cw357 wrote:

In post 383, Titus wrote:Loyal is the correct modifier.

maybe we're both wolves

could titus be telling me that to in essence pocket me or whatever
like trying to work into the townclears

it would be a big-brain strategy but not necessarily too far-fetched

i wouldn't mind the idea of the vig targeting titus and ill doc so that kill doesnt go through
although if vig is fakeclaiming it could get screwed up

I really don't get why stating something based off years of experience has been all this AI. Feels like I'm being pocketed.

That would make it odd to pocket me unless I might be the decider and one of the wagons might be on scum.

In post 515, T3 wrote:Tr on jessica for now, her points about cw I agree with. Titus fails to mention that there is no town motivation behind dgb still not believing cw so I think I'll keep my vote there.

I got my second shot yesterday and as a result of it my JIA is acting up again so I'm just stuck on the couch feeling like shit on the first day of sumer break

In post 517, Titus wrote:It feels like excalq just summed out rather than be eliminated. It makes me feel the slot is town but gives me a salty taste about it as town reading the slot encourages that behavior and its OOG.

In post 517, Titus wrote:It feels like excalq just summed out rather than be eliminated. It makes me feel the slot is town but gives me a salty taste about it as town reading the slot encourages that behavior and its OOG.

In post 519, Titus wrote:

In post 515, T3 wrote:Tr on jessica for now, her points about cw I agree with. Titus fails to mention that there is no town motivation behind dgb still not believing cw so I think I'll keep my vote there.

I got my second shot yesterday and as a result of it my JIA is acting up again so I'm just stuck on the couch feeling like shit on the first day of sumer break

I literally just mentioned the town motivation. There's no way you're this dense.

In post 521, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 517, Titus wrote:It feels like excalq just summed out rather than be eliminated. It makes me feel the slot is town but gives me a salty taste about it as town reading the slot encourages that behavior and its OOG.

Lucky for me, I don’t know what any of this means. I still think the slot is scum.