Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:59 pm
And the fact Luke's read is so far back indicates to me Roden was searching for anything to grasp onto
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Claiming the Kyouko is getting scum read for bad reasons but then still voting her anyway without giving any reasons of her own. This is so out of character for her and such a wild shift from my last encounter that I think I feel the same way she did when she meta'd me and saw my scum games.In post 244, Angel Warriors wrote:Ngl. I think all of the reasons to scum read Kyoto are bad however I agree with the conclusion that Kyoto is scum. im inclined to towered t3 despite his reason being wrong because it sounds towny enough that he's picking at something super insignificant.In post 202, Robert M Hunter wrote:Good catch.In post 182, T3 wrote:Whoa, whoa, whoa, wait a minute.In post 177, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Well I did want to vote luke up until 174, but now we have Noraa Roden and luke town, House off the table but tbh I skimmed him as i was focused on reading roden/nora.In post 136, Angel Warriors wrote:I think Lukewarm is scum if anyone wants to debate that with me. I think T3 and roden are scummy but I'm unwilling to look at them much at this point because their play styles are naturally scummy.
-bear nornor
I think i understand the T3 votes but i dont know yet if I agree with them. I'd rather VOTE: Guillotina right now
"I understand where the T3 votes are coming from"
The.... 2 RVS votes?
VOTE: ssbm
VOTE: ssbm
-Nor bear bear bear
Oh god, you really do just play like this, huh?In post 496, Dwlee99 wrote:No and I haven't read anything.In post 494, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Are you caught up?In post 468, Dwlee99 wrote:If we get a claim I wouldn't mind hammering it even though there is time left. People can catch up at night : shrug:
Because nobody's defending him and he isn't giving us any content to work with. Like this is literally doing nothing. We got more content when I was being wagon'd and I'm town. Hell I'm fine with votes on me if that gives people stuff to say. My post isn't a soft defend because there's nothing in that post even remotely exonerating him or that could be seen as an attempt at town casing him.In post 498, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:What is the purpose of this post? As far as I can tell it's unrelated to any conversation thread and the last time Luke mentioned a T3 scum read was kind of far back.In post 456, Roden wrote:If multiple people are confident on Luke being town then I think his read on T3 has merit.
I cant figure out what you're thinking here. For as much interaction as you have with quite a few people, and for as much as it looks like you're possibly trying to find scum, I was surprised to see you haven't interacted with or commented on RMH, except once in 439, where you softly defend his slot for a really bad reason. It doesn't occur to you that RMH is scum waiting out the pressure and laying low? It occurs to me that this is what's happening and it's your job to redirect the heat.
Why shouldn't he be a wagon?
I mean, yes. I don't think it's a helpful wagon to have atm unless we're feeling pretty good about voting out RMH. And tbh I'm just not seeing a strong case against him, nor a reason to end Day 1 early.In post 499, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:The only thing 456 correlates to is derailing the RMH wagon imo
Luke's scum case is hardly the most interesting thing to happen in this thread and we both know that. No offense intended, Luke.In post 500, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:And the fact Luke's read is so far back indicates to me Roden was searching for anything to grasp onto
You weren't vibing withIn post 497, Roden wrote:Guillo seemed ready to death tunnel you, and I wasn't vibing with your response. But I think it makes more sense that he was just super sensitive to getting scum read for the wrong reasons, not necessarily because he's actually scum but because he didn't think your reasoning was good. He claimed to be certain you were scum but backed down when questioned more on it, which made me think it was an emotional/pride thing. Basically I do think it's possible to be a fake response but for you both to be town anyway.In post 492, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:What seems fake about it?In post 418, Roden wrote:I don't think the interaction between you and Guillotina is genuine, but idk if it's both of you or just one of you. It's not guaranteed either of you are scum either even if I'm right, since I believe third party is a possibility.
I don't know what you could possibly be trying to imply here other than me being scum partners with you. This is not a good response.In post 504, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:You weren't vibing withIn post 497, Roden wrote:Guillo seemed ready to death tunnel you, and I wasn't vibing with your response. But I think it makes more sense that he was just super sensitive to getting scum read for the wrong reasons, not necessarily because he's actually scum but because he didn't think your reasoning was good. He claimed to be certain you were scum but backed down when questioned more on it, which made me think it was an emotional/pride thing. Basically I do think it's possible to be a fake response but for you both to be town anyway.In post 492, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:What seems fake about it?In post 418, Roden wrote:I don't think the interaction between you and Guillotina is genuine, but idk if it's both of you or just one of you. It's not guaranteed either of you are scum either even if I'm right, since I believe third party is a possibility.myresponse, but you votedGuillotina, even though he is the one you perceived as having a prideful reaction that could be fake, and coming from town.
So why Guillotina rather than me?
Why bring it up then?In post 424, Roden wrote:In post 421, Guillotina wrote:How come? I didn't see anything in the OP that hinted 3P.In post 418, Roden wrote:I believe third party is a possibility.Because this isn't a Normal game and I can't assume we don't have 3P. It's unlikely since I can't imagine what flavor would be used as a reason to include it, but it's not impossible AFAIK.In post 423, Gamma Emerald wrote:how so?In post 418, Roden wrote:I believe third party is a possibility.
Just stating my thought process at the time. Not sure why that's being questioned since it does literally zero to aid me if I'm scum.In post 507, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why bring it up then?In post 424, Roden wrote:In post 421, Guillotina wrote:How come? I didn't see anything in the OP that hinted 3P.In post 418, Roden wrote:I believe third party is a possibility.Because this isn't a Normal game and I can't assume we don't have 3P. It's unlikely since I can't imagine what flavor would be used as a reason to include it, but it's not impossible AFAIK.In post 423, Gamma Emerald wrote:how so?In post 418, Roden wrote:I believe third party is a possibility.
Why is Lukewarm scum?In post 436, T3 wrote:I'm strongly inclined to trust Noraa on this.
The town: T3, House, Angel, Guillo, Roden
The scum: Lukewarm, RMH
I don’t think it’s likely myself and my first blush response was to view the suggestion with skepticismIn post 509, Roden wrote:Actually what made you respond to that in particular?
I might be confbiasing currently reading up with suspicions on lukewarm. this feels super partner-yIn post 456, Roden wrote:If multiple people are confident on Luke being town then I think his read on T3 has merit.
what a way to actually cover all bases in one post. this post is super backtrack-y in a way that im not sure how to explain.In post 467, Roden wrote:At the risk of giving myself scum equity in case it is a red flip, I don't recommend hammering when we still have 11 days to go and we still have people trying to catch up.
I hate this because it gives room to reverse his TR on us the moment its no longer popular/consensus. he knows that titus is someone thats played with me a decent amount(from her posts. she is directly metaing me) and hes asking her why which is a really easy entrance to the SR AW clubhouse.In post 471, Roden wrote:They put in the effort to meta me and readjusted their read on me because of it. I think Nora specifically could've gotten away with just death tunneling me and leaving it at that since that would cause more chaos while earning herself a stronger town read, since that's exactly what happened last time we played together when she was town. This can change depending on how the rest of the game goes of course, but I don't think AW should be a Day 1 elim.In post 469, Titus wrote:I'd like some engagement on why AW is town considering I have an unpopular view.
Does she still tunnel people as scum? Or does she play more conservatively?
ummmm im not a fan of mara's reads but i dont see anything too crazy scummy currently.In post 476, Marashu wrote:My super-accurate day 1 solve is currently {Kyouko, Lukewarm, Angel}. Prove me wrong.
Who caught you on page ten in DBZ and was the only person in the game who caught you??????????? hm????????????????In post 488, Guillotina wrote:I don't believe they got better at reading me in a couple of months.
incorrect. you are just one of those smooth scum players. that means people who dont understand that your town and scum games are night and day will not be able to catch scum you. that is why you're under the impression that you're hard to read. because people tend to scum read your town game and town read your scum game. is that right? that is exactly how my game is. I know better than anyone what it feels like.In post 490, Guillotina wrote:I'm very hard to read.
This feels performative.In post 511, Angel Warriors wrote:OOOOOO SPICY alright its been a while since I've been scum read this much as town.
I will try my best to prove my towniness! this is exciting actually.
-Nornornornronronrornornornonoronro
hahahahahhaha. alright I will take a look at this old scum game of mine. you're totally bullshitting. this isn't what my scum game looks like.In post 497, Roden wrote:this looks incredibly condemning
sure but i was UTR soon after. I've been worried because of this playerlist specifically.In post 519, Lukewarm wrote:And also, not even true? Like, you described yourself as being a USR day 1 of that multiball game
This is a bad reason to stop the wagon. It's not like the thread is waiting with bated breath for RMH to come and post - there's still plenty of conversation going about other avenues. We should be giving him a free pass to wait out the pressure. You're acting like his wagon is bad for the conversation but I see no indication that this is the case. If you see something that indicates otherwise, could you illustrate that? I'm having a hard time believing this is a real thought process.In post 502, Roden wrote:Oh god, you really do just play like this, huh?In post 496, Dwlee99 wrote:No and I haven't read anything.In post 494, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Are you caught up?In post 468, Dwlee99 wrote:If we get a claim I wouldn't mind hammering it even though there is time left. People can catch up at night : shrug:
Because nobody's defending him and he isn't giving us any content to work with. Like this is literally doing nothing. We got more content when I was being wagon'd and I'm town. Hell I'm fine with votes on me if that gives people stuff to say. My post isn't a soft defend because there's nothing in that post even remotely exonerating him or that could be seen as an attempt at town casing him.In post 498, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:What is the purpose of this post? As far as I can tell it's unrelated to any conversation thread and the last time Luke mentioned a T3 scum read was kind of far back.In post 456, Roden wrote:If multiple people are confident on Luke being town then I think his read on T3 has merit.
I cant figure out what you're thinking here. For as much interaction as you have with quite a few people, and for as much as it looks like you're possibly trying to find scum, I was surprised to see you haven't interacted with or commented on RMH, except once in 439, where you softly defend his slot for a really bad reason. It doesn't occur to you that RMH is scum waiting out the pressure and laying low? It occurs to me that this is what's happening and it's your job to redirect the heat.
Why shouldn't he be a wagon?
I mentioned Luke's scum case on T3 because it got buried and I think it should be looked at more if people town read him. He's strong as town and I'm not the only one who thinks so, so his reads should be given a spotlight if there's a general consensus that we can trust him.
I mean, yes. I don't think it's a helpful wagon to have atm unless we're feeling pretty good about voting out RMH. And tbh I'm just not seeing a strong case against him, nor a reason to end Day 1 early.In post 499, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:The only thing 456 correlates to is derailing the RMH wagon imo
Luke's scum case is hardly the most interesting thing to happen in this thread and we both know that. No offense intended, Luke.In post 500, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:And the fact Luke's read is so far back indicates to me Roden was searching for anything to grasp onto