Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:38 am
Oh, you're coming out with reads.In post 498, Save The Dragons wrote:i like cool cookie and house for town
Ossum
Ossum
Page 21 of 93
Ossum
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:38 am
yep this game is like 10 pages of trash and 10 pages of mech talkIn post 499, House wrote:Really?In post 479, Save The Dragons wrote:god i reread the game and still came up with jack shit
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:39 am
I'll get back to you on this after ketchup. I'll have to ISO them.In post 481, Save The Dragons wrote:do the people that found oster scummy have opinions about dwlee
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:39 am
Am I scummy because I think your reaction is bad?In post 384, redtea wrote:actually I think you both are saying the same thing
I'm not actually back but I'm checking in, which has apparently been a mistake because I'm all over the place
well thats just cause you're scummyIn post 362, Jacket wrote:I think redtea's reaction to being wagoned is bad.
is that a take ive posted yet?
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:41 am
Fair take on Osetr, tbh.In post 487, Three wrote:I voted Osetr because I didn't like them and because they would be a liability in ELo.In post 481, Save The Dragons wrote:do the people that found oster scummy have opinions about dwlee
Dwlee so far is not that but also not much else either.
I like playing with dwlee. I hope he's not scum this game.
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:44 am
I can hazard a guess as to what the explanation will be, but I'll keep quiet about my opinion until I see an answer.In post 488, cool cookie wrote:would be good to see an explanation of the second sentence?
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:44 am
fua is still obvious mafia. House seems fine. Not much else is interesting.
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:47 am
You were concerned about someone being an ELO liability on day 1?In post 487, Three wrote:I voted Osetr because I didn't like them and because they would be a liability in ELo.In post 481, Save The Dragons wrote:do the people that found oster scummy have opinions about dwlee
Dwlee so far is not that but also not much else either.
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:47 am
Because if we lim scum, we can use the bullet to hunt for the partner. Particularly if we get the scum!PR.In post 490, cool cookie wrote:in which case, you become effectively vanilla. so why not elim you?
Also, if we run up a player that claims VT, there's the danger of redtea testing that claim.
redtea never makes it to ELo regardless of alignment. Let's use our lim to find otherscum.
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:50 am
StD/T3: is this a dumbtell?In post 490, cool cookie wrote:i sort of struggle to believe fua-scum would protect redtea-traitor like this though...
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:52 am
why
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:53 am
That's a really short-term strategy. If redtea is fakeclaiming, no 2nd kill on a scum lim outs them, and vig is explicitly a town only role.In post 490, cool cookie wrote:it's exactly the sort of claim which might get them out of trouble
Not what I'd associate with a scum agenda.
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:53 am
This is shallow as fuckIn post 497, House wrote:In post 472, T3 wrote:I hate dwlee's posts but I also always hate his postsThis reads as kinda partnery. dwlee is shading T3, but simultaneously discrediting the shade by calling it policy.In post 473, Dwlee99 wrote:t3 I will policy you wtf
If one flips red, I'm going to want the other one dead.
T3 is in like 80% of my games, of course I'm going to be friendly with him
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:54 am
They seem to be assuming that fua knows that redtea is the traitor, when mafia is uninformed as to who the traitor is.In post 510, Save The Dragons wrote:why
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:55 am
I said nothing about your friendliness with him. I wonder why you ignored the context of my post and created your own?In post 512, Dwlee99 wrote:This is shallow as fuckIn post 497, House wrote:In post 472, T3 wrote:I hate dwlee's posts but I also always hate his postsThis reads as kinda partnery. dwlee is shading T3, but simultaneously discrediting the shade by calling it policy.In post 473, Dwlee99 wrote:t3 I will policy you wtf
If one flips red, I'm going to want the other one dead.
T3 is in like 80% of my games, of course I'm going to be friendly with him
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:57 am
i took this to mean conditionals like fua!scum redtea!traitorIn post 513, House wrote:They seem to be assuming that fua knows that redtea is the traitor, when mafia is uninformed as to who the traitor is.In post 510, Save The Dragons wrote:why
like why would fua as scum defend a potential redtea traitor
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 9:59 am
Kind ofIn post 496, House wrote:I don't understand how these 2 statements can coexist in the same post about the same content.In post 468, T3 wrote:This also comes across as really forced but I kind of agree with what you're saying.In post 422, fua wrote:Whatever happens, we shouldn’t eliminate redtea. By nature of their actual role, unless they and the informed townie are scum together, then they’re essentially confirmed town unless they get shot by the real vigilante overnight, no? I feel like anyone trying to push for them to die because of their ‘lack of utility’ just wants to see a townie die to begin with, and strikes me as incredibly suspicious. Not to mention that redtea doesn’t even have to shoot until we’re sure we’ve bagged a mafia.
VOTE: Three
Your insistence on killing off someone who claimed a PR comes off as weird to me. Maybe the mafia has two power roles and you’re afraid of getting shot at night.
Please explain.
As in the first part makes sense
The second part is a misrep
The post itself has a weird tone
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 10:01 am
The context behind what I said is that I'm friends with him, your framing of it is just wrongIn post 514, House wrote:I said nothing about your friendliness with him. I wonder why you ignored the context of my post and created your own?In post 512, Dwlee99 wrote:This is shallow as fuckIn post 497, House wrote:In post 472, T3 wrote:I hate dwlee's posts but I also always hate his postsThis reads as kinda partnery. dwlee is shading T3, but simultaneously discrediting the shade by calling it policy.In post 473, Dwlee99 wrote:t3 I will policy you wtf
If one flips red, I'm going to want the other one dead.
T3 is in like 80% of my games, of course I'm going to be friendly with him
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 10:03 am
I'm not going to think too deeply about asoociatives on day 1. I'm just going to vote people I find scummy.
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 10:04 am
Again, that assumes knowledge of redtea's alignment.In post 515, Save The Dragons wrote:i took this to mean conditionals like fua!scum redtea!traitorIn post 513, House wrote:They seem to be assuming that fua knows that redtea is the traitor, when mafia is uninformed as to who the traitor is.In post 510, Save The Dragons wrote:why
like why would fua as scum defend a potential redtea traitor
There is scum equity in defending a towny that is coming under fire, so they (the scum) look good after the flip for not wanting to kill town. Especially if the lim is pushed through well before deadline.
Whomever scum is has to guess as to who the traitor is, just like the rest of us.
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 10:05 am
Three sheeping a gut a read of mine seemed strange.In post 493, House wrote:I don't get this.In post 466, T3 wrote:uh....In post 418, Three wrote:I see.In post 406, T3 wrote:In post 358, cool cookie wrote:i'm ambivalent about the claim. an outted traitor doesn't serve much purpose for mafia, so there isn't anything we particularly lose by giving redtea a night to prove the claim. gut is i don't buy it thoughFua's vote on george gut pinged me as really terrible.
VOTE: Fua
Why?
Between Jacket and you casing Fua, why are you confused about the vote?
This doesn't seem genuine.
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 10:06 am
i don't think cool cookie knows a vig can't kill BP but doesn't know that traitors are unknown to mafiaIn post 359, cool cookie wrote:real vig cant kill a bulletproof traitor
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 10:06 am
MultipleIn post 494, House wrote:Do because of one instance of "shitfighting" being TvS, you consider it to be >rand TvS when it happens?In post 467, T3 wrote:In post 419, redtea wrote:I guess I should've said that it wasnt just the back and forth, but the vibes of it plus the fact it's all over the placeIn post 417, T3 wrote:People tend to write off shitfights like this as tvtIn post 412, redtea wrote:this is ridiculous
if this isn't tvt i'll eat this delicious brownie
does scum go this hard over mechanics
in practice they are actually slightly >rand t/s
interesting thoFair.In post 420, redtea wrote:i think also it depends on the players
I recently played a game where my scumpartner got into a fight with a townie that took up like half of the day and everyone wrote it off as tvt.
Ehhhh.
Can't say why though.
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 10:09 am
Depends on site meta wherever he comes from, maybe? I've played it both ways.In post 521, Save The Dragons wrote:i don't think cool cookie knows a vig can't kill BP but doesn't know that traitors are unknown to mafiaIn post 359, cool cookie wrote:real vig cant kill a bulletproof traitor
cool cookie, did you play elsewhere where traitor was known to groupscum?
Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2021 10:11 am
Probably slightly town indicative.In post 509, House wrote:StD/T3: is this a dumbtell?In post 490, cool cookie wrote:i sort of struggle to believe fua-scum would protect redtea-traitor like this though...