Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 8:19 pm
Up!
But also NaniIn post 496, Enchant wrote:Taly i think is person who making "Heylook i am scumhunting post per player", but genuine believing is d1 mason claim is eeeeh. Like, it's too serious. It's also strange, considering even my mind about game changes pretty fast. So now, you will post per player everytime it happens? Pssh.
What is scum indicative to you there?In post 502, Flea The Magician wrote:Someone explain to me how enchant is town
What panic? I can see the Meg thing maybe.In post 490, Titus wrote:He's chainsawing for Meg like no other. I don't see hunting. Instead I see panick.
Nothing came of it, but you can keep your vote on me if you want.In post 333, Galron wrote:I'm still waiting for something wrt to that yume vote so you can keep your vote on me.In post 329, Scorpious wrote:It was originally RVS but I wanted to follow up on something I had asked him before I officially lifted it.In post 327, Greeting wrote:@Scorpious, is your vote onGalronRVS and if not, then why is it there?
YIn post 513, Galron wrote:Nothing came of it, but you can keep your vote on me if you want.In post 333, Galron wrote:I'm still waiting for something wrt to that yume vote so you can keep your vote on me.In post 329, Scorpious wrote:It was originally RVS but I wanted to follow up on something I had asked him before I officially lifted it.In post 327, Greeting wrote:@Scorpious, is your vote onGalronRVS and if not, then why is it there?
This is actually incorrect. Voting lurkers limits places for scum to hide.In post 515, Enchant wrote:Voting lurkers for pressure is so far useless, because they know it's just for pressure.
We need murderkill lurkers on spot for effect.
I'd rather find out what people are seeing that I'm not.In post 507, Taly wrote:What is scum indicative to you there?In post 502, Flea The Magician wrote:Someone explain to me how enchant is town
I'll review after Meg flips scum. My sole mistake in Holiday Dance Party started as a chainsaw read but beards happen. I struggle with those.In post 512, Galron wrote:What panic? I can see the Meg thing maybe.In post 490, Titus wrote:He's chainsawing for Meg like no other. I don't see hunting. Instead I see panick.
Yume tends to get replaced. I think the game is short enough to allow a sub to make it readable.In post 514, Scorpious wrote:UNVOTE:In post 513, Galron wrote:Nothing came of it, but you can keep your vote on me if you want.In post 333, Galron wrote:I'm still waiting for something wrt to that yume vote so you can keep your vote on me.In post 329, Scorpious wrote:It was originally RVS but I wanted to follow up on something I had asked him before I officially lifted it.In post 327, Greeting wrote:@Scorpious, is your vote onGalronRVS and if not, then why is it there?
It’s pretty irrelevant considering this slot isn’t even playing.
I agree. Murderkill just lets scum vote out lurkers and shoot leaders killing the game. Lurkers are a compromise option, not a primary.In post 516, Scorpious wrote:This is actually incorrect. Voting lurkers limits places for scum to hide.In post 515, Enchant wrote:Voting lurkers for pressure is so far useless, because they know it's just for pressure.
We need murderkill lurkers on spot for effect.