Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 4:15 pm
okay so Titus brought up that the slip could be a distraction for S_S, which would tie Furtive to S_S but as you're saying, wouldn't make sense since furtive SRs Ircher. makes sense.
In post 491, Uncrowned wrote:from like, a fear of being elimmed perspective? no.
from a "there's probably at least one scum on here" yeah I think so?
this seems like a really weird thing for you to fixate onIn post 492, Uncrowned wrote:granted the activity level of the entire wagon is low but i doubt it's just all town chillin on there
i think andre is good out of them, everyone else im null to SLing on
In post 491, Uncrowned wrote:from like, a fear of being elimmed perspective? no.
from a "there's probably at least one scum on here" yeah I think so?
the first 4 votes are essentially rvs (andres had a reason but was very early) and nero's is a naked oneIn post 492, Uncrowned wrote:granted the activity level of the entire wagon is low but i doubt it's just all town chillin on there
i think andre is good out of them, everyone else im null to SLing on
how dare you assumed that I don't clothe my votesIn post 502, petapan wrote:nero's is a naked one
it's an odd competing wagon that's been just... around for most of the game so far without any real interest, follow up or anythingIn post 501, fireisredsir wrote:In post 491, Uncrowned wrote:from like, a fear of being elimmed perspective? no.
from a "there's probably at least one scum on here" yeah I think so?this seems like a really weird thing for you to fixate onIn post 492, Uncrowned wrote:granted the activity level of the entire wagon is low but i doubt it's just all town chillin on there
i think andre is good out of them, everyone else im null to SLing on
why would there specifically be scum on the ydra wagon
what spawned this thought for you
In post 513, Nero Cain wrote:Why have I moved so far down?
it's really a body of work type of thing where i found quite a few of her posts to be scummy sounding but i wasn't interested in expanding on it because i have resolved to take it easy and because going full blown scumcase this early often just means conf biasing yourself. wanted to play it low key and let thins flow naturally rather than trying to wrestle the thread over a gutread, yknow?In post 516, Klick wrote:Peta I initially had the same feelings as you about Titus but decided I wasn't confident that her 221 was AI
I decided that I could easily be reading lawyer-posting constructing an argument on unconvincing logic as a scumtell
I'm interested in hearing more about why you scumread the post and how confident you feel in the read
Proved you right...? Can you walk me through this one? I don't see the issue with 432.In post 478, Uncrowned wrote:In post 474, Roden wrote:Vibing with this. It's just a reasonable take.In post 353, petapan wrote:the accusation of someone being frozen for not posting within a 19 hour window is pretty lulzy
this isn't fucking mafia universe and i'm grateful for that
(this is not implying a read on ircher ftr)
Not vibing with this though.In post 409, Uncrowned wrote:roden has gone missing ever since he stopped getting questioned for the mech mistake stuff
you got any actual input now or are you just here to defend yourself when you get sussed
I don't think I was gone all that long? I went to bed then went to work when I woke up. And I've been keeping up with the thread and responding to stuff and giving my thoughts. What gave you the impression otherwise?funnily enough after calling you out i remember thinking "hm maybe that was a bit hasty" but then straight after with your very next post you proved me right and went straight back to mech talk in 432 lolIn post 432, Roden wrote:I think I agree with Penguin 100% here about set up balances. Feels kinda weird, I'm usually neutral at best with him.
?In post 480, Uncrowned wrote:and your thoughts prior to this recent posting you've just done were all setup/mech related, so there's not really much to 'vibe' with it's just facts