Mafiascum.net

The tedious part is assigning 72 associative values

I can cut it down to 71 by saying Vanderscamp is my bestie

Can we extend the deadline by two weeks I miss the two thousand noughts

That is pure rhetoric as a disclaimer

Waiting for the png titled 'associative tells' from you

If I worked at my past jon where I could desktoppost I totally would

I'll wait

In post 500, Una wrote:The tedious part is assigning 72 associative values

Co..could you explain this to me like.. really slowly?

In post 490, unwnd wrote:My gamestate take right now is

Timeline A - The vibers are proportionally more town right now. Lucian (a mafia member) cannot keep up with the general camaraderie and is being iced out by his approach. There could still be one viber who could be scum, but currently I don't see it. This timeline ends with Lucian being iced out and his partner not having enough sway to stop the vibers either.

Timeline B - Scum is hiding in vibers. They are using camaraderie to post in plain daylight with nobody considering their motives, due to the vibes they bring. This timeline ends with Ydrasse winning as mafia.

Timeline C - A mix of both timelines in some form

I find it's usually C

Timeline D host forgot to pick mafia members and we are in a social experiment

Definitely something pooky would do!

Each player has an associateion to each other player 9*8=72.
Number of players times number for my little pony friendships.
It is 9*8 instead of 9*9 because you can't be friends with yourself.
So when you pick a friend there is one fewer people than 9 to choose one.
But there are 9 choices of how to reincarnate yourself into this game.

In post 511, Una wrote:Each player has an associateion to each other player 9*8=72.
Number of players times number for my little pony friendships.
It is 9*8 instead of 9*9 because you can't be friends with yourself.
So when you pick a friend there is one fewer people than 9 to choose one.
But there are 9 choices of how to reincarnate yourself into this game.

sugoi

I will be here for deadline to do a coalition, busy atm

I vaguely liked Ydrasse's thoughts in 436, it feels like a townie thought process. It's somewhat diminished because she originally walked back from it pretty quick.

As for Dannflor's thoughts on Vanders in 447... Big oof. I definitely do not want Vanders in the coalition now, barring some spectacular explanation from them. But they're not being that townie anyway, IMO, so...

In post 465, unwnd wrote:The only person to really solidfy a stance is ironically Lucian

Almost as if I'm town. (Yes, I know that doesn't make me town, shut up.)

In post 468, unwnd wrote:I feel like what I've said about Lucian is what I want people to focus on and give attention to, with shitpost-esque content in the interrim

Why? This phase is about building a towncore, not scumreads.

In post 497, Una wrote:Lucian you will vibe with me right

I tried to vibe with you, then you started scumreading me. Yes, I know what this implies, I don't care, I like vibing and I think it can be a good way to read people sometimes.

In post 0, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Ydrasse
Lucian
Menalque
unwnd
Dannflor
Una
Greeting
JunkoChan
Vanderscamp

Right now, I definitely want Vanders out. Greeting should also probably be out. I'm assuming everyone and their grandma will veto me.

I think I need to see the town!Ydrasse case, because I am increasingly feeling less and less comfortable with Menalque being inside the coalition, but I still have paranoia on Ydrasse.

In post 425, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:The deadline is in 0 days, 18 hours, 2 minutes.

Oh no.

I will not be around for the last... 3-4 hours of this deadline. My preference is above, but we'll see how this IRL day progresses, I guess.

In post 447, Dannflor wrote:

Spoiler:

In post 356, Vanderscamp wrote:

In post 351, JunkoChan wrote:Jk jk I mean, this phase is like lottery, You put your numbers in it and pray, not wanting to engage in perma wifom is town indicative for me

This feels very strange, why would lack of thread presence be town indicative?
Like even if "not engaging in wifom" is a valid reason to townread someone, which it probably isn't, surely most scum don't want to do it either just based on general scum slankiness tendencies?

Unless your read on Mena is that they try harder as scum, which from the scum game I've seen from them is absolutely not the case.

In post 380, Vanderscamp wrote:

In post 362, JunkoChan wrote:

In post 355, Vanderscamp wrote:

In post 342, Una wrote:Vanderscamp, do you think you would have played differently so far as mafia?

I'd probably try harder to get in a coalition.

In post 356, Vanderscamp wrote:

In post 351, JunkoChan wrote:Jk jk I mean, this phase is like lottery, You put your numbers in it and pray, not wanting to engage in perma wifom is town indicative for me

This feels very strange, why would lack of thread presence be town indicative?
Like even if "not engaging in wifom" is a valid reason to townread someone, which it probably isn't, surely most scum don't want to do it either just based on general scum slankiness tendencies?

Unless your read on Mena is that they try harder as scum, which from the scum game I've seen from them is absolutely not the case.

this is a contradiction you know?

you are answering your own doubt, you are saying you would try hard to get in a coalition as maf but critic my pov that trying less is town indicative.

HURT: Vanderscamp

Mena and I are different players.

I enjoy being scum, and Mena's performance as scum in the game I played with them was not enthusiastic to say the least.

In post 383, Vanderscamp wrote:

In post 382, JunkoChan wrote:

In post 380, Vanderscamp wrote:

In post 362, JunkoChan wrote:

In post 355, Vanderscamp wrote:

In post 342, Una wrote:Vanderscamp, do you think you would have played differently so far as mafia?

I'd probably try harder to get in a coalition.

In post 356, Vanderscamp wrote:

In post 351, JunkoChan wrote:Jk jk I mean, this phase is like lottery, You put your numbers in it and pray, not wanting to engage in perma wifom is town indicative for me

This feels very strange, why would lack of thread presence be town indicative?
Like even if "not engaging in wifom" is a valid reason to townread someone, which it probably isn't, surely most scum don't want to do it either just based on general scum slankiness tendencies?

Unless your read on Mena is that they try harder as scum, which from the scum game I've seen from them is absolutely not the case.

this is a contradiction you know?

you are answering your own doubt, you are saying you would try hard to get in a coalition as maf but critic my pov that trying less is town indicative.

HURT: Vanderscamp

Mena and I are different players.

I enjoy being scum, and Mena's performance as scum in the game I played with them was not enthusiastic to say the least.

I mean, I love playing scum, town is like meh, unless the lobby is fun and dandy

Does Mena love playing scum?

vanderscamp you rolled scum with Menalque in micro 999 last year, a game in which he top posted and end gamed

so why is this your opinion of menalque's scum game

also, I do not understand why you asked whether menalque loves playing scum when it's clear you have some meta with menalque and also have already formed your own opinion on his alignment preference?

I just looked up this game, I have no memory of this game at all

If mena solo won this game which seems to be what happened then my read on mena might be shit here

My question regarding mena enjoying scum was meant to be informative rhetorical based on mena playing a not great scum game in the only game I remember playing with mena

What game are you talking about?

In post 515, Lucian wrote:I vaguely liked Ydrasse's thoughts in 436, it feels like a townie thought process. It's somewhat diminished because she originally walked back from it pretty quick.

As for Dannflor's thoughts on Vanders in 447... Big oof. I definitely do not want Vanders in the coalition now, barring some spectacular explanation from them. But they're not being that townie anyway, IMO, so...

My "spectacular explanation" is that I don't read games I die early in and I forgot this game existed, you can see in my most recent town game that I was under the impression I've played one scum game on this site ever (and not the game I played with mena.

I agree if mena top posted that game and solo won as scum my read on mena is not going to be as good, I'm basing my mena read on the game I played, I don't remember what the game was called, but it was the one where essentially a character of unknown alignment gets a hit on a player in the game N0, and mena played, sorry to say mena and please don't ban me for hate speech or whatever, but mena played literally one of the shittest scum games I have ever seen in my life before replacing out. If mena is capable of solo winning as scum which seems to be a thing then I retract my mena townread.

I also agree I haven't been exceptionally towny and am fine with me not being in your coalition

In post 521, Lucian wrote:What game are you talking about?

The game you referenced

In post 520, Vanderscamp wrote:mena playing a not great scum game in the only game I remember playing with mena

Please link this game.