Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 11:17 am
I would mind actually.In post 4997, Gypyx wrote:you mind if i just put link to previous posts as explainations bell?
But you can take your time.
I would mind actually.In post 4997, Gypyx wrote:you mind if i just put link to previous posts as explainations bell?
The difference here is that we legitimately thought you were crumbing doc and/or even night modifier. I think you can see that for yourself.In post 4998, Bell wrote:But each of them mischaracterized by town play as scum play
or mechanically reasoned incorrectly.
And then if she flips scum that means she was just being scum?In post 5002, Bell wrote:If she flips town you realize that it was titus just being titus right?
*taps your sarcasm radar*In post 5006, Brian Skies wrote:No, I'm telling you that she's probably just scum here.
And that your situation is not her situation.
Oh, well, sure. We're definitely two different people.In post 5009, Bell wrote:You weren't saying this.
You were arguing that it wasn't fair that I was applying a titus measurement stick to Titus.
But not applying a Titus measurement stick to Brian.
In post 5750, Dandelion Wine wrote:(This is as close as you're going to get to an endorsement to keep living, Bell, just take it before I go back into the death wind tunnel)
I actually have theories of Bell-scum universes that I've been withholding because I want to believe in a Bell-town universe, but he's making it difficult to do that.In post 5751, Dandelion Wine wrote:For the record, I am accepting that Bell issue is now effectively kicked down the road and can be re-evaluated as need be, if he lives to lategame ya'll can channel my "I told you so" or when I come back as a stump you can expect it then.
Sure, I'm scum with Titus.In post 5015, Brian Skies wrote:No, I'm saying I can't tell if your position here is because you legitimately think that Titus play here is just 'weird' rather than you being her buddy and trying to protect her.
If she doesn't flip some sort of strongman or other interference role, then yes, you're probably going to come under heavy scrutiny.In post 5017, Bell wrote:Sure, I'm scum with Titus.
This makes sense and is definitely something you've thought deeply about.
I don't wanna be that guy, but this isn't a good post.In post 5019, Brian Skies wrote:If she doesn't flip some sort of strongman or other interference role, then yes, you're probably going to come under heavy scrutiny.In post 5017, Bell wrote:Sure, I'm scum with Titus.
This makes sense and is definitely something you've thought deeply about.
In post 4840, Brian Skies wrote:I was thinking of her argument about there needing to be two or more doctors to protect the lovers with the presence of two night kills.
There are a lot of problems with this.
1) They would just claim their role and we would probably just not turnstile them.
2) The two claimed protective roles we have claim they can only use their role in their current timestream, so it would be impossible to protect both anyway. And their roles seem to only function if they both exist in the same timestream.
3) By the time the timestreams converge, the scumteam goes back to one night kill (presumably) and I think the need for town to have two or more protective roles sitting on the lovers is silly and probably not an expectation we should have. Like have you seen any games where multiple doctors were included just to protect lovers? Or any game where protecting the lovers was a requirement to win?
I'm just struggling to see this here.
Bell, I'm curious to know your opinions on these things.In post 4849, Brian Skies wrote:In post 5573, Dandelion Wine wrote:This makes zero fucking sense then, if you're told of this property of your role PM you will literally never choose to do this.In post 5561, Something_Smart wrote:Oh yes, I shouldn't say "thread." Same timestream. The timestreams remain separate even after the merge.In post 5575, Dandelion Wine wrote:Like just sit down and think about this:
Why put the lovers condition in, as a mod, when neighbors start already in opposite time streams; which is already "optimal neighbor placement"?
And if you do... why TELL them about it?In post 5579, Something_Smart wrote:Because he wanted to add in more effects that have to do with inversion to make it more likely to be relevant?In post 5575, Dandelion Wine wrote:Why put the lovers condition in, as a mod, when neighbors start already in opposite time streams; which is already "optimal neighbor placement"?It would be incredibly rude bordering on bastard to not.And if you do... why TELL them about it?In post 5583, Something_Smart wrote:I think what you're risking as scum is losing the ability to mis-exe me.In post 5565, Firebringer wrote:also SS i don't think im risking anyting by defending u. nor do i think im hard defending u.In post 5585, Something_Smart wrote:Yes.In post 5573, Dandelion Wine wrote:This makes zero fucking sense then, if you're told of this property of your role PM you will literally never choose to do this.
I would think it's meant to be negative utility (either for both of us if we're both town, or for the scum one if one of us is scum).
Am I wrong though?In post 5021, Bell wrote:I don't wanna be that guy, but this isn't a good post.