Mafiascum.net

In post 4993, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 4989, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:we just need to have them so high up on the TR list that they shoot each other

yeah I mean this is how multiball works

game tends to stagnate when town realizes how little agency they have compared to scum

tmiing the passive players town VOTE: Something_smart

There aren't enough scum for all the passive players to be scum.

Plus I'm one of them.

In post 5001, Something_Smart wrote:There aren't enough scum for all the passive players to be scum.

Plus I'm one of them.

wait how do you know how many scum there are?

ROFL

VOTE: something smart

I mean there surely aren't, like, eight scum alive...

How would that even be scummy, it's not like scum know how many scum there are either

idc at this point let's wagon someone
any wagon will do something to help apathy here

VOTE: pooky

that last post really reads like a cheap gotcha but it doesn't make sense at all if you put binoculars up to it

I mean yes

that's not a scum pooky thing, but it could be

we know its cats mafia vs dogs mafia

but what we don't know is how MANY cats vs how MANY dogs.

I assume its symmetrical for balance purposes.

so if there's like 4 cat mafia, there should be 4 dog mafia. If there's 3 cat mafia, there should be 3 dog mafia.

SS is TMIing that the scum distribution in this game is on the lower end of possible distributions.

I think it's most likely 3 cats and 4 dogs and even if it were 4/4 my statement would still be true.

you're also changing the meaning of what Isis said your TMI is.

She said you are TMIing that all the passive players in this game are town.

You changed it to "the passive players can't "

that's not even an equivalent statement.

Like the possible worlds are:

(A) All of the passive players are town.

(B) Some of the passive players are scum.

(C) All of the passive players are scum.

She said you TMI'd (A) - you countered her by saying (C) can't be true but the default town mindset isn't (C), it's (B).

She didn't say that I TMI'd the passive players town. I never claimed that my post explained 100% of the passivity in the game. My implicit claim was that some people were being passive for the reason I described; this isn't a TMI as long as I can demonstrate that some passive players are town.

As much as I scum read the REAL GIRL

I think she has a valid point

Prod taken sorry

We need something to happen to reinvigorate the game.

And I used to scum read the slot plus PoE, we can do that

yeah ok lets go, VOTE: Something_Scummy

The apathy is real and we need more to work with (somehow)

In post 5008, Something_Smart wrote:I mean yes

that's not

necessarily

a scum pooky thing, but it could be

I wasn't really fully on board with the TMI thing but then this reads exactly like "I'm gonna pretend to defend potential cw, Pooky, but not completely eliminate the possibility".

I think SS is at like 6 or 7 we need a vc

In post 5017, Shiro wrote:

Vote:S_S

We need something to happen to reinvigorate the game.

Which is why you're following the main wagon?

Conflict creates action; Variance creates change

I have a power role. I am not allowed to claim what it is before I use it; however, it may be used during the day.

I would like Toadette to tell me whether she has access to any private topics. It would probably be helpful for other scummy players such as Psyche to do this as well, in case she can't/won't.

VOTE: noone

i have no PT access