Page 202 of 323

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 1:09 am
by 0verki11
Hi so
Moongrass, Chemist, Clemency and someone else always coaltion
moongrass is probably WIFOM antispewing so just dont listen to a word they say right now.

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 1:21 am
by themilkcartonkid
@Nancy, I'm asking you kindly to stop harassing me, thank you.

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 1:39 am
by Chemist1422
this game got toxic kinda fast
0verki11 wrote:Hi so
Moongrass, Chemist, Clemency and someone else always coaltion
moongrass is probably WIFOM antispewing so just dont listen to a word they say right now.
hmm

what do you think about titus's coalition plan?

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 1:40 am
by Chemist1422
In post 4537, Titus wrote:
In post 4536, Pink Ball wrote:Could you explain that to me like I'm 2 years old? I'm actually 3 but I skipped kindergarden
Sure. When a coalition fails, there must be scum inside the group. In this case,

themilkcartonkid, Skygazer, RadiantCowbells, Creature, NanceFloor, Ankamius (now you), Chemist1422, Clemency

has at least 1 scum.

If we coalition the left overs, then we either win or we know there is at least 1 scum in there.

There are three scum alive.

Therefore, mathematically there can only be 3:0, 2:1 or 1:2 as possibilities.

Coalitioning the leftovers means eliminating 3-0 in most likely scenarios. If it is 3-0 we just win.

In order to coalition the leftovers, we need two dead from the original coalition.

That means the veto needs to consist of four slots from the original coalition.

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 1:41 am
by Chemist1422
Anyone putting moongrass in the coalition instead of creature/PB should probably read this

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 1:50 am
by Creature
For it to be 3:0 gotta be hardcore pessimism.

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 4:04 am
by Titus
In post 5030, Creature wrote:For it to be 3:0 gotta be hardcore pessimism.
That coalition was hardcore bad.

Second, eliminating possibilities is how town wins.

VC please

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 6:41 am
by chennisden
Oh look its almost like scum put TD with TMCK so TD would be an easy mislynch later on!

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 6:42 am
by chennisden
tmck was the leading wagon d1

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 6:43 am
by chennisden
WTF MOONGRASS NEVER GOES IN COALITION

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 6:44 am
by chennisden
When this game is over im not forgiving shoshin for not being here

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 6:45 am
by chennisden
Cuz Shoshin finds every wolf

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 7:38 am
by NanceFloor
In post 5025, 0verki11 wrote:Hi so
Moongrass, Chemist, Clemency and someone else always coaltion
moongrass is probably WIFOM antispewing so just dont listen to a word they say right now.
I think, anyone who has Maria in veto is being antitown and gamethrowing, so I’d look there first.

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 7:42 am
by NanceFloor
In post 5026, themilkcartonkid wrote:@Nancy, I'm asking you kindly to stop harassing me, thank you.
Can I ask you to stop trying to kill obvtown?

I apologize for the way I expressed myself but I still nevertheless stand by the basic sentiment. You had some brilliant ideas - combine consensus tr with weak town coalition members but you wanting to veto me and RC was terrible antitown play. Sorry if that upsets you.

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 7:43 am
by Skygazer
oh cool nance is town

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 7:55 am
by NanceFloor
In post 5027, Chemist1422 wrote:this game got toxic kinda fast
0verki11 wrote:Hi so
Moongrass, Chemist, Clemency and someone else always coaltion
moongrass is probably WIFOM antispewing so just dont listen to a word they say right now.
hmm

what do you think about titus's coalition plan?
I think PB isn’t scum and should not be in veto. Yet another reason why Maria is obvtown. I know that PB misconstrued this as me waffling but my point was not to hedge on him but rather to stress the point that Moon and PB are never SvS because Ank’s interactions with both Moon and Mbaki were anti-partnery.

I find Moon’s recent dumbtell about repicker unconvincing since it’s on page 1 of this setup and he has been in this game long enough to have read the setup. I do however believe PB’s dumbtell because I think that’s not easily fakable. It read genuine to me. Plus, he sounds good tonally.

Wrt to Creature, him tr Moon and vetoing Maria pings me a bit. I’m also suspicious of him thinking my slot could possibly be scum here. He’s played enough games with me to realize I’m obvtown here. Still I would rather exclude him from 2nd coalition than veto him because his point about scum killing the strongest members of the coalition over the weak still holds.

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 7:58 am
by NanceFloor
In post 5039, Skygazer wrote:oh cool nance is town
So is Maria and no one should have her in veto. The fact that Moon does should make you especially wary of that.

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 8:00 am
by Skygazer
UNVOTE:

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 8:00 am
by Skygazer
i mean distancing is a thing but

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 8:11 am
by NanceFloor
In post 4475, Creature wrote:
In post 4474, NanceFloor wrote:I don’t understand why you wouldn’t have anyone in the failed coalition in this list?
If the veto list was Ank's slot, Clem, Chem and me, what do you think would happen?
In post 4478, Creature wrote:
In post 4476, RadiantCowbells wrote:you and {chem/ank} would die
Exactly
In post 5029, Chemist1422 wrote:Anyone putting moongrass in the coalition instead of creature/PB should probably read this
Hmmmm . . .

You do know that PB/Creature would likely get killed over you/Clem in this scenario, right?

You specifically mentioning Moon here, also makes me wonder.

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 8:14 am
by NanceFloor
In post 5043, Skygazer wrote:i mean distancing is a thing but

If he’s distancing anyone here, it’s not Maria. He wants her dead, so she can’t be in 2nd coalition. There is absolutely no protown reason to veto Maria.

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 8:55 am
by Moongrass
I'd rather base my veto off the dance pairings than put 2 town from the coalition up for the kill just to waste our repick on having another coalition fail. That's me though, you were all going to do what you wanted anyway.

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 9:11 am
by NanceFloor
In post 5032, chennisden wrote:Oh look its almost like scum put TD with TMCK so TD would be an easy mislynch later on!
Or scum put their lowest hanging fruit with an IC to help them live a little longer

- Dann

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 9:16 am
by NanceFloor
Also, I'm not going to read the last 7 pages or whatever beyond skimming nor do I intend on spamming the thread anymore than I have to responding to anything

in regards to PB I still town read the slot I just thought his reads are bad ( so i apologize if I said anything hurtful that was not my intention beyond some sass )

the blind confidence with which he pushed is also +town imo albeit frustratingly

- dann

Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 9:30 am
by Creature
I'm bored.