In post 5046, tenebrousluminary wrote:As a Mason you do get more say than the rest of us but that does not make you king.
You’re right I do get more say
And that has been fucking ignored all game
My point was that it hasn't. We listened to you about Galron until the available evidence changed. I am sorry that you are having trouble factoring in that evidence but I am not going to pretend it does not exist.
In post 5046, tenebrousluminary wrote:As a Mason you do get more say than the rest of us but that does not make you king.
You’re right I do get more say
And that has been fucking ignored all game
My point was that it hasn't. We listened to you about Galron until the available evidence changed. I am sorry that you are having trouble factoring in that evidence but I am not going to pretend it does not exist.
And I disagree with your point.
If we had actually not had me fight for control we’d have Galron’s likely scum flip here.
Town Galron posts and scum Galron doesn’t. It’s blatant.
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:28 pm
by MathBlade
And hell like I said if you disagree with that Nero or Cape or VP should be the elim
Asking me to elim town is silly and I won’t support it.
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:29 pm
by MathBlade
We’ve had 5000 posts for “thoughts”
We need a fucking PoE and a scum elim.
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:30 pm
by the worst
If either player holds more than 7 cards as the result of a transfer, the excess cards must be immediately discarded to the Player Discard Pile.
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:32 pm
by tenebrousluminary
In post 5054, MathBlade wrote:And hell like I said if you disagree with that Nero or Cape or VP should be the elim
Asking me to elim town is silly and I won’t support it.
I don't subscribe to the setup speculation that is leading you here.
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:32 pm
by Titus
Are you positing the scumteam claimed they were in a neighborhood D1? If not, there's town in your list. In fact, half town probably at least even in your setup.
Second, Math persuasion is not about control but cooperation. Town can discuss their reads but a solid townblock has different skills that come together for the ultimate prize. A good leader looks for people who are willing to discuss but disagree. A good town leader doesn't seek control to push their answer.
In post 5054, MathBlade wrote:And hell like I said if you disagree with that Nero or Cape or VP should be the elim
Asking me to elim town is silly and I won’t support it.
I don't subscribe to the setup speculation that is leading you here.
So you think town has
4 person fake masonry
A fake guilty in a vig
And a two town masonry
Yeah just no
That doesn’t pass a review
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:33 pm
by Titus
VOTE: DV
Tend/VP, let's do this.
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:34 pm
by MathBlade
In post 5058, Titus wrote:Are you positing the scumteam claimed they were in a neighborhood D1? If not, there's town in your list. In fact, half town probably at least even in your setup.
Second, Math persuasion is not about control but cooperation. Town can discuss their reads but a solid townblock has different skills that come together for the ultimate prize. A good leader looks for people who are willing to discuss but disagree. A good town leader doesn't seek control to push their answer.
See Titus v. Alisae
I tried cooperating yesterday
I got made fun of and bad
So this is the only option left is repetitive
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:35 pm
by MathBlade
In post 3501, April Ludgate wrote:You being conf town means you have the spot of everyone trying to appease you to get town read, Math, meaning that there's likely going to be some gaps from scum actively putting effort into not getting put on the conf town's naughty list.
why not eyes? he has 2 votes already and he was one of your top scumreads, right?
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:37 pm
by MathBlade
So if you say I am wrong bring receipts
Explain how that setup passes review or vote in that hood
It’s the same problem I had in the game I just got out of
I was right in scum bussed
But I was shut out because “Math”
There is scum in that hood.
Argue all you want on who, but at least one scum is in it.
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:38 pm
by Titus
As a mason, you have to be open to possibilities that you are wrong. The more you tunnel, the less influence you have because people know it's not from a guilty and it makes your posts look more like desperation than evidence. Chill out. Enjoy the game. Play mind tricks on people. You can take risks and engage in scummy behavior to get reads. Abuse the conftown privilege there.
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:39 pm
by MathBlade
VOTE: Galron
If you all are going to look in majority town I am at least leaving my vote as a protest one.
why not eyes? he has 2 votes already and he was one of your top scumreads, right?
I missed that.
VOTE: eyes
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:40 pm
by MathBlade
In post 5065, Titus wrote:As a mason, you have to be open to possibilities that you are wrong. The more you tunnel, the less influence you have because people know it's not from a guilty and it makes your posts look more like desperation than evidence. Chill out. Enjoy the game. Play mind tricks on people. You can take risks and engage in scummy behavior to get reads. Abuse the conftown privilege there.
That’s what yesterday was and I was brutally ignored
If cooperating and discussion doesn’t work what the hell else is there?
Everyone just says no and does something else
There’s no discussion to be had
Do your dumb shit I have to be up in 4-5 hours
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:44 pm
by Titus
Can you at least give an opinion of eyes when you wake up Math?
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:45 pm
by MathBlade
In post 5069, Titus wrote:Can you at least give an opinion of eyes when you wake up Math?
In post 5069, Titus wrote:Can you at least give an opinion of eyes when you wake up Math?
Town good night
Ok an opinion with reasons. Please don't sass me. I'm trying here.
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 7:48 pm
by MathBlade
In post 3717, Eyes without a face wrote:Serious question: Are we looking for scum or are we looking for things we don't like in each other's playstyles? because it seems to me everybody has been looking on the game from their own perspective and how the other should be playing not whether the other is making something that looks like it's scum driven.
Also everybody (in general and not just in this game) assume they are smart and everybody else is dumb. "scum will push this and not that" may only work if -say- someone is being tricky, but I don't think having a different opinion or changing one's opinion or some other shit that every player does regardless of their alignment qualifies as a reason to scum read someone.
@Deas: regarding 3702 what would you have done in that situation? Imagine that you were not being pushed at one point and then the tide changes and you are the leading wagon. Would you still sit back and relax or would you try to at least defend yourself? I think we both know the answer to that and that -again- is regardless of the color of your PM.
In post 3717, Eyes without a face wrote:Serious question: Are we looking for scum or are we looking for things we don't like in each other's playstyles? because it seems to me everybody has been looking on the game from their own perspective and how the other should be playing not whether the other is making something that looks like it's scum driven.
Also everybody (in general and not just in this game) assume they are smart and everybody else is dumb. "scum will push this and not that" may only work if -say- someone is being tricky, but I don't think having a different opinion or changing one's opinion or some other shit that every player does regardless of their alignment qualifies as a reason to scum read someone.
@Deas: regarding 3702 what would you have done in that situation? Imagine that you were not being pushed at one point and then the tide changes and you are the leading wagon. Would you still sit back and relax or would you try to at least defend yourself? I think we both know the answer to that and that -again- is regardless of the color of your PM.
