Mafiascum.net

Actually we'll withdraw from that - we thought Andrius had flipped non-bloody but in going back we realize bloodiness is not revealed which changes the situation as we understood it.

Meh.
Maybe okay with kunk lynch at this point.

@Trilo - dodge of Nacho over Feysal response from us? What is your argument for Feysal first?

I'll refer you to post 5004 (and the link contained within.)

You can also look back at the preceding posts for my responses when VP was the one inquiring about it.

It gets annoying answering the same question you already answered for someone else.

Apologies - we thought you wanted to open up discussion on the subject.

You really find the Baby Spice vote (which is the extent of the link in question) more compelling than Nacho's play?

Have you responded to his defense of such? (We'd just ask you your opinion on that defense but don't want to upset you again)

(totallynotmafia, xvart, , , , )
(VasudeVa, Trilobite)
(Triglav)
(, , , , , , VP Baltar)
Nicodemus - 0 (, , , , , )
totallynotmafia - 0 (, , , , , )
Iecerint - 0 (, , , , , )
Triglav - 0 (, , , , , )
VasudeVa - 0 (, , , , , )
kunkstar7 - 0 ()

Not Voting (6) - (Benmage, Feysal, Iecerint, kunkstar7, Nachomamma8, Nicodemus, , )

xvart wrote:Mods: Is this correct or does not needing to use [Corpse Dust] not consume it?

He dies, remember. He somehow ressed Xvart over Seacore.

-___-



Actually. Who claimed to rez Wickedest first? Was it Nacho or Feysal? I think it's likelier that first claim is scum. If Town wickedest rezzer already claimed, no way cult would claim a rez on that too. So if the cult Wickedest rezzer claimed first, the Town rezzer claimed afterwards to cause this clusterfuck. Unless they are both Town(very very unlikely).

The order of the res claims actually doesn't matter. The cult would know their ritual failed and would know a town ressed wicked, so it wouldn't matter if cult claimed 1st or 2nd.

VasudeVa wrote:-___-

We are lynching one of the Wickedest rezzers(Nacho/Feysal). There is GUARANTEED one scum between them and I really really don't want both noncontributing lurkers surviving for tommorow.

Actually. Who claimed to rez Wickedest first? Was it Nacho or Feysal? I think it's likelier that first claim is scum. If Town wickedest rezzer already claimed, no way cult would claim a rez on that too. So if the cult Wickedest rezzer claimed first, the Town rezzer claimed afterwards to cause this clusterfuck. Unless they are both Town(very very unlikely).

No we aren't... We aren't doing a coin flip. There is no rationale behind trilo's actions...He tried to dance around, but it was flailing. He's cult. He dies.

Thats it.

Coinflip is better than lynching Town. Jus sayin'.

VV, I claimed first.
I also don't see how you get off calling anyone a noncontributing lurker >.>

Claim order doesn't matter. Nor do I even care for the false dichotomy of 'both claimed rezz, therefore one is scum.' At least Trilo is making a case and trying to lynch people based on scumminess. That's how you actually play this game.

VP Baltar wrote:Nico, what do you actually think are the odds of kunk being town at this point?

Very, very low. I just don't like putting all my eggs in one basket.

@Nacho, how do you explain your lurking/non-contributing in this game?

One of them is telling the truth since Wickedest confirmed the rez.
Don't think both of them are Town. (Nacho is lurky, uncooperative and gains unnecessary insanities by "cowering", Trilo has a nice case on Feysal.)
Both scum is stupid scum play.
Hence, one Town, one scum.
Why is it a false dichotomy?

EBWOP: I guess I should say, where do you think people got that impression of you, and do you think you've been contributing to the game to your full capacity. If not, why not?

VasudeVa wrote:One of them is telling the truth since Wickedest confirmed the rez.
Don't think both of them are Town. (Nacho is lurky, uncooperative and gains unnecessary insanities by "cowering", Trilo has a nice case on Feysal.)
Both scum is stupid scum play.
Hence, one Town, one scum.
Why is it a false dichotomy?

The problem is that you don't consider that they both could have rezzed him, however unlikely that is. You're treating it as a foregone conclusion that one of them HAS to be scum. I'm ok with lynching out of that pool, but if we mislynch and I'm alive tomorrow, don't expect me to immediately wagon the other person saying that the person can't possibly be town.

I wanted to lynch one of Feysal/Nacho WAY BACK ON D2 when I first replaced in and everyone said NO THEY COULD PLAUSIBLY BOTH BE TOWN QUIET YOU.

Whatever.

I already said I don't think they are both Town. I considered it, see it as unlikely and trashed the idea. What makes you think they are both Town? Why are you even voting for Nacho if you are 'considering' that?

I'm going to enjoy stabbing you soon. To think I was rezzing you for a few nights.

I FEEL SO BETRAYED. YOU USED ME VP BALTAR. USED MEE.

VasudeVa wrote:I already said I don't think they are both Town. I considered it, see it as unlikely and trashed the idea. What makes you think they are both Town? Why are you even voting for Nacho if you are 'considering' that?

I'm going to enjoy stabbing you soon. To think I was rezzing you for a few nights.

I FEEL SO BETRAYED. YOU USED ME VP BALTAR. USED MEE.

Sigh....I never said that it is likely they are both town. Do you read what I write, or simply just see 'blah blah blah' and make things up as you go along?

Why are you even talking about it if you don't think it's likely? >.>.

Vas, my point was that I DO think we should lynch out of those two today. My argument with you is in saying it absolutely HAS to be one of them. I just don't like chaining lynches like that. Every lynch, regardless of flip, is a chance to reflect and adjust reads accordingly. Taking things as a foregone conclusion is how you lose games. I am disagreeing with your point in the chance that I'm dead and not around tomorrow to do it. In which case, I don't want to see some scummy run up if we mislynch today and then saying 'whoopsie daisy, guess I should have thought about chaining their lynches together like that, oh well' tomorrow. Understand?

I'm narrowing it down to two people because we need a lynch and we need it fast. And you're like "Now now Vas, let people vote whoever they want". It's almost like you aren't affected by the little time we have left! Now who does that? Oh yeah, scum.

There are to deadline in a game that's stalling. Add the fact that there are stubborn people in this game being uncooperative. You be scum with this 'Let my people Vote whoever the fuck they want!' charade you're doing. If you're Town, this is ridiculous. It's stupid and it won't get us anywhere, not with the time we have.

How do you mean I'm not concerned about the time? As far as I'm aware, I was the catalyst to people actually voting for scum as soon as suicidal was done. Furthermore, I have explained why I think Nacho should be lynched today. I'm starting to have a hard time believing that you are paying this little attention to this game. Did you not see my posts prior to yours telling people to get in gear with lynching?

We should probably just lynch Kunkstar the obv scum. Anything else is going to be a scramble at this point and I don't see anyone disagreeing that Kunkstar is actually cult.

Onto the matter of the deadline