Mafiascum.net

In post 5072, Taly wrote:

In post 4962, Toogeloo wrote:I still think going with Cakez, then dwlee, then gamma, then myself is best. If we are all town, who gets shot here? My money's on Gamma.

OK, why

Cakez

before

Dwlee

?

It was my suggestion, it's flexible. Hell, put Cakez third and me 4th.

How would you feel about the first four being dwlee, HQ, Cakez, me?

If it's that order, I'm guessing dwlee gets shot right away if he's town to avoid having to either kill or confirm the other 3 (or avoid a loss).

All I'm getting at is that the first four should be used for scum hunting, or making scum get rid of a scummy slot for us.

People are trying too hard to save their "slightly townier," than the back four, but that's not the best way to play this event.

In post 5076, Toogeloo wrote:How would you feel about the first four being dwlee, HQ, Cakez, me?

If it's that order, I'm guessing dwlee gets shot right away if he's town to avoid having to either kill or confirm the other 3 (or avoid a loss).

I don’t want to risk Dweele being shot. Why are people okay with this?

Ulyana, HQ, Cakez, Toog.

Who gets shot here?

In post 5080, Toogeloo wrote:Ulyana, HQ, Cakez, Toog.

Who gets shot here?

Not me obviously. I don’t trust Cakez though.

Trust doesn't matter.

If all 4 of us are town, scum has to shoot one slot or lose. If any of us are scum, we just told town that at least 1 in the 4 of us is scum.

2 of the 4 could be scum, and scum could shoot one of us for WIFOM too, but either way, a scummy viewed slot is either being handled, exposed, or winning the game.

In post 5082, Toogeloo wrote:Trust doesn't matter.

If all 4 of us are town, scum has to shoot one slot or lose. If any of us are scum, we just told town that at least 1 in the 4 of us is scum.

So what you’re proposing if one of the four die, we lim the three remaining slots until we find scum?

But if we get scum last, we’d have two miselims, no?

In post 5083, Toogeloo wrote:2 of the 4 could be scum, and scum could shoot one of us for WIFOM too, but either way, a scummy viewed slot is either being handled, exposed, or winning the game.

That’s possible too, I guess.

Well I’m onboard with that but I’m not sure you’ll convince enough people to push me across.

Keep in mind there’s also who we want left out to worry about

Well, I think you and dwlee both agreed to be in the bottom four together, lol. The 4 who stay behind should have the most weight on who goes forward, if you think that might make it fair, but in all reality, the 4 most town read players will occupy those spots, and there will either be a game over win, or a dead player who's reads might better influence the last 4 as well.

The point is, you want someone who highly scum read to be forced to be killed because scum have to do it.

Also, given the nature of these games, I am willing to bet the final 4 play a mini game for survival.

I forgot about gammagooey. Put him in the first four with HQ, Cakez, and myself. The scumspect lineup.

Although, I think gooey is probably just scum and shouldn't because it's obvious lol.

Having more decisive scum suspects in the first 4 is probably better.

In post 5091, Toogeloo wrote:I forgot about gammagooey. Put him in the first four with HQ, Cakez, and myself. The scumspect lineup.

Who do you want left behind? We can only kill in the four uncrossed players.

In post 5092, Toogeloo wrote:Although, I think gooey is probably just scum and shouldn't because it's obvious lol.

Oh nm but there’s still three more.

In post 5091, Toogeloo wrote:I forgot about gammagooey. Put him in the first four with HQ, Cakez, and myself. The scumspect lineup.

OKAY STOP.
I think I’ve heard enough from you at least for now. Stop posting for like an hour.

In post 5088, Toogeloo wrote:Well, I think you and dwlee both agreed to be in the bottom four together, lol. The 4 who stay behind should have the most weight on who goes forward, if you think that might make it fair, but in all reality, the 4 most town read players will occupy those spots, and there will either be a game over win, or a dead player who's reads might better influence the last 4 as well.

NO WE DIDN’T
Our conversation progressed past that to a split pool idea, and even then I’ve since moved on to trying to do it mathematically.
Do you not realize if someone crosses that should otherwise get left behind, someone else has to stay behind in their place? Or do you just not care?

In post 5096, Gamma Emerald wrote:OKAY STOP.
I think I’ve heard enough from you at least for now. Stop posting for like an hour.

Lol, well, that's a switch lol.

Well I think you need to get your grubby little paws out of the dip
It really seems like you’re trying to test me by seeing how bad a plan you can get away with. I will not abide!