Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 6:47 am
In post 5174, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm just about done with Shoshin sry
I’m really sorry to hear that, she would have been a dream as IC.
I’m really sorry to hear that, she would have been a dream as IC.
Page 208 of 323
I’m really sorry to hear that, she would have been a dream as IC.
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 6:48 am
Also I'm not a fan of browbeating tmck out of the game
nsg or riot
nsg or riot
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 6:49 am
what about the worst
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 6:51 am
It doesn't matter if you think I'm town, the chance of catching the whole scumteam in the veto is really low; I would even say impossible 'cause there must be scum outside the previous coalition. But it's forcing the scumteam to kill slots that are better solved by flipping than other ways. We have to leave our own scumreads aside and get rid of stinky slots. Also, mechanically speaking, what Titus is proposing will eventually solve those scumreads. Now's not the timeIn post 5172, NanceFloor wrote:But I think you’re town. I hard townread you, Sky and RC and I don’t want you to die :/. I also think Moon is scum. The only non-lhf in the coalition that I am less confident on is Creature.In post 5170, Pink Ball wrote:I really think vetoing the LHFs from the coalition is the best way to get this game going. Titus is right, her plan is cool, let's follow it and move on. (I don't think I'm a LHF but I repped in the last and that makes me less useful than the rest)
So, is 3 coalition members I’m not hard townreading + my strongest sr a bad compromise?
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 6:56 am
PB I don't understand how you advocate in good faith not clearing the coalition when you think that I'm scum
If we veto up the coalition list I'm eventually gonna be cornered. If not, you have to catch both scum while having no leverage to prevent me from derailing lynches on my buddies.
That's why I think you're scum by the way
Moongrass too is just coming up with reason after reason to not give me coalition and not really contributing anything else
If we veto up the coalition list I'm eventually gonna be cornered. If not, you have to catch both scum while having no leverage to prevent me from derailing lynches on my buddies.
That's why I think you're scum by the way
Moongrass too is just coming up with reason after reason to not give me coalition and not really contributing anything else
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 6:59 am
the worst is The Worst possible candidate for the position
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:04 am
I wasn’t trying to do that. He already replaced out. I just wanted him to stop pushing terrible reads on us.In post 5176, RadiantCowbells wrote:Also I'm not a fan of browbeating tmck out of the game
nsg or riot
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:06 am
Yeah, nsg would be awesome.
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:07 am
I wouldn't mind seeing FA either 
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:08 am
Every lose condition I can think of
is something that gets way easier to solve by dealing with the coalition situation today
is something that gets way easier to solve by dealing with the coalition situation today
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:12 am
Vetoing a bunch of scummy players is Feels good but not actually optimal at all
Like if there's no scum townier than Chemist/Clemency are we losing this game ever
Whereas if there is, then we need as many phases as possible to deal with ir
I also don't want to feed scum a free creature kill b/c if this is a hard game then we really want him alive
Like if we can clear 2 scum and 1 of 4 I see that argument but I dunno
Like if there's no scum townier than Chemist/Clemency are we losing this game ever
Whereas if there is, then we need as many phases as possible to deal with ir
I also don't want to feed scum a free creature kill b/c if this is a hard game then we really want him alive
Like if we can clear 2 scum and 1 of 4 I see that argument but I dunno
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:12 am
You really think scum!PB would risk being vetoed? Agree on Moon obviously. Pushing 2nd veto over 2nd coalition, just reads like a way to kill more townies without any reason.In post 5179, RadiantCowbells wrote:PB I don't understand how you advocate in good faith not clearing the coalition when you think that I'm scum
If we veto up the coalition list I'm eventually gonna be cornered. If not, you have to catch both scum while having no leverage to prevent me from derailing lynches on my buddies.
That's why I think you're scum by the way
Moongrass too is just coming up with reason after reason to not give me coalition and not really contributing anything else
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:16 am
If you're scum why not make a show of being willing to be vetoed? It's not like you're going to kill yourself
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:18 am
Creature is pinging me a bit with his Moon tr, Maria sr and his saying he’d be okay with me and Sky being vetoed over him/PB - after he made just a big deal about not having 4 coalition members in veto.
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:22 am
I guess so, I didn’t really think of that. His tone sounds pure to me though, plus he didn’t seem to have a clue about any of the mechanical stuff when he replaced in.In post 5187, RadiantCowbells wrote:If you're scum why not make a show of being willing to be vetoed? It's not like you're going to kill yourself
Also as I’ve said, I read his and Moon’s interactions as anti-partnery.
Well if PB wants it and the majority is onboard with it, I guess I’ll vote there over veto failing.
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:28 am
?In post 5179, RadiantCowbells wrote:PB I don't understand how you advocate in good faith not clearing the coalition when you think that I'm scum
If we veto up the coalition list I'm eventually gonna be cornered. If not, you have to catch both scum while having no leverage to prevent me from derailing lynches on my buddies.
That's why I think you're scum by the way
Moongrass too is just coming up with reason after reason to not give me coalition and not really contributing anything else
I don't think you're scum. I clearly stated that my scumread on you was conditional to my NanceFloor scumread, which I flipped after Nancy's reaction to my scumread. So now I changed the approach and I'm happy with being part of the veto. It would be pretty cool if you stopped calling me scum when I'm pretty obvtown, you're not helping your own slot.
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:30 am
I'm not acting like a martyr, I know I can still be alive after being vetoed lol
RC, saying this things right now is just creating WIFOM towards my slot and basically making sure I won't be killed if I get vetoed. Play like the godtier player you think you are
RC, saying this things right now is just creating WIFOM towards my slot and basically making sure I won't be killed if I get vetoed. Play like the godtier player you think you are
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:36 am
not sure if ank/fusc associations are S/S actually the more i read ank's iso
like in particular ank saying this:
lmk if you think im wrong but
like in particular ank saying this:
feels too on the nose to be an association with ank, feel like she wouldn't soft-defend a scum partner when there's a flip imminentIn post 2088, Ankamius wrote:Can someone case Fuscosco for me or something
I don't really see it either
lmk if you think im wrong but
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:37 am
PB is scummy with wanting to be veto'd but ehhhhhh
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:46 am
Describe your feelingsIn post 5193, Skygazer wrote:PB is scummy with wanting to be veto'd but ehhhhhh
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:49 am
In post 5187, RadiantCowbells wrote:If you're scum why not make a show of being willing to be vetoed? It's not like you're going to kill yourself
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 7:59 am
It's pretty biased that RC says that makes PB scummy when he seemed to townread 0K around the time he was putting himself in the veto.
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 8:02 am
I'm not making a show, I'm just agreeing with Titus' approach, and I'm not even saying I *want* to be vetoed, rather saying I'm ok with it 'cause I don't know who's a better candidate. And exactly: since I don't know if I'm dying or not, it's not like a self-vote situation where "if you know you're town you shouldn't be voting yourself".
I'm being pretty objective with this matter: my slot is down with the LHFs 'cause I repped in too late and it is not in my plans or intentions to read the game as a whole. Is there another slot that should be vetoed rather than me and/or the LHFs?
I'm being pretty objective with this matter: my slot is down with the LHFs 'cause I repped in too late and it is not in my plans or intentions to read the game as a whole. Is there another slot that should be vetoed rather than me and/or the LHFs?
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 8:03 am
RC wants me to be scum 'cause I called him scum, it's as simple as that. I'm hoping he realizes that he's being daft, especially since I'm not even scumreading him.In post 5196, Moongrass wrote:It's pretty biased that RC says that makes PB scummy when he seemed to townread 0K around the time he was putting himself in the veto.
Posted: Mon May 20, 2019 8:44 am
Well, you already know MY answer to that. And I know veto is not = to selfvoting, so if you’re specifically asking about coalition slots, I would say no but fypov, I don’t understand why it needs to be all coalition. I think Moon needs to be in veto, which takes up one slot.In post 5197, Pink Ball wrote:I'm not making a show, I'm just agreeing with Titus' approach, and I'm not even saying I *want* to be vetoed, rather saying I'm ok with it 'cause I don't know who's a better candidate. And exactly: since I don't know if I'm dying or not, it's not like a self-vote situation where "if you know you're town you shouldn't be voting yourself".
I'm being pretty objective with this matter: my slot is down with the LHFs 'cause I repped in too late and it is not in my plans or intentions to read the game as a whole. Is there another slot that should be vetoed rather than me and/or the LHFs?