Mafiascum.net

In post 5197, Andante wrote:lol is it cause I'm on to you?

No. You repeatedly back off on scum wagons when fading and jump on when there's momentum. For the most part, you are a very passive voter.

I haven't even read today.

~Mama

What do you think of my other VCA reads Adante?

~Mama

In post 5194, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 5184, Cephrir wrote:What does hostile mean?

I assume roleblocks and the like. That's what my mind went to. I know it doesn't protect against kills, and I would assume it would allow neighboring actions to go through.

PEdit: I platinum'd the Complete Edition on PS4, and then again on PS5. I'd say I'm pretty good with the flavor.

I feel like you should have asked the mod about this like immediately if it wasnt in your role PM

Are you sure it isnt in your role pm

In post 5200, The Three Bears wrote:

In post 5197, Andante wrote:lol is it cause I'm on to you?

No. You repeatedly back off on scum wagons when fading and jump on when there's momentum. For the most part, you are a very passive voter.

I haven't even read today.

~Mama

In post 5201, The Three Bears wrote:What do you think of my other VCA reads Adante?

~Mama

I mean hey, I go where my TRs agree. and idk what the other VCA reads are, I just think it's funny yall want me the most here. I'm going to bed. too tired for this, probably sheeping either norwee or dragons or ceph here for what they wanna do

In post 5202, Cephrir wrote:I feel like you should have asked the mod about this like immediately if it wasnt in your role PM

I didn't feel like I needed to because it quite literally says it stops hostile non-lethal actions in the role pm, and therefore that really only leaves a handful of assumptions.

hostile non lethal... such as if evil Dragons sent you evil mail?

idk too tired, I'll think about this tomorrow UNVOTE:

make sure im not voting

I wonder if, if toog's role is legit, we can assume that ambiguous actions cant exist.

Uh I had another point here but I forgot it

In post 5179, Andante wrote:Ok, serious question, I don't mean this in a bad way or anything, but why are the bears still alive?? they're universally agreed upon as the towniest here.. and there are 3 of them in 1 slot...

Because people keep claiming or softing powerful roles, making them priority targets over someone who hasn't claimed at all.

NGL though, I thought the Bears were Jesse, I thought they were Informed that I was town.

Hostile non lethal?
So like ascetic but… weird? And that’s 2 ascetic type roles in this game now.

im such a mess. im so frustrated right now ugh.
catboi died because i was being stupid and had paranoia on dunn being scum at the very last minute.
i faked a clear on galron because i thought he was town. everyone called him scum and i chickened out of my read.

UGH pain. so much pain. why does this game just constantly feel like a loss oml

also this is what i'd like currently but this is pending confirmation from my hydra buddies.
I'd like
1) a claim from cephrir
2) a claim from roden
3) a claim from mastina

my brain's a mess rn though so uh probs dont do that rn

Feel like Toog claim is real since it’d be weird fake claim from scum since we already have ascetic type role in Tictac.
And flavour checks out.

Has Tictac claimed flavour? They should if they haven’t.

yeah they claimed

i think?

everyone should flavor claim though tbh. flavor is the best way to tell toogs alignment

we'll need to create a good order though

In post 3164, tictac wrote:actually flavorclaiming might be a thing that matters.
i'm benicoff tv.

Right they claimed this.

In post 851, Arcade Pals wrote:I honestly regret not just naked voting Roden for reaction.

Mush/STD/DW/Tat feel fine.

Who is DW that Dunn/Nancy were referring to here? This post and the post prior in the iso should pretty much clear Roden I think, but I'm wondering if Dunnslot was clearing a scum buddy in that grouping of 4.

In post 5204, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 5202, Cephrir wrote:I feel like you should have asked the mod about this like immediately if it wasnt in your role PM

I didn't feel like I needed to because it quite literally says it stops hostile non-lethal actions in the role pm, and therefore that really only leaves a handful of assumptions.

In post 5211, The Three Bears wrote:also this is what i'd like currently but this is pending confirmation from my hydra buddies.
I'd like
1) a claim from cephrir
2) a claim from roden
3) a claim from mastina

Already claimed, I'm Polaris.

Although considering Took has master knowledge of the game and is apparently flavour expert maybe i shouldn’t use that to solve Galron allignment, never mind that.

In post 5220, Roden wrote:

In post 5204, Toogeloo wrote:

In post 5202, Cephrir wrote:I feel like you should have asked the mod about this like immediately if it wasnt in your role PM

I didn't feel like I needed to because it quite literally says it stops hostile non-lethal actions in the role pm, and therefore that really only leaves a handful of assumptions.

In post 5211, The Three Bears wrote:also this is what i'd like currently but this is pending confirmation from my hydra buddies.
I'd like
1) a claim from cephrir
2) a claim from roden
3) a claim from mastina

Already claimed, I'm Polaris.

we know that.

Ok my brain is dying. *Toog
And not Galron i meant Toog there too.

I wonder why we would have an ascetic and a hated asceticizer. If they're both real, that is

Maybe it's because of the mold