Page 210 of 305

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:09 am
by Morning Tweet
mine

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:10 am
by Taly
TWEETIE!!!! ❤

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:21 am
by Gamma Emerald
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
The idea is to have me and Dwlee go back to back, right? Did I misunderstand something?

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:23 am
by Taly
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:24 am
by Taly
In post 5227, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Gamma Emerald
The idea is to have me and Dwlee go back to back, right? Did I misunderstand something?
Not necessarily, I mean, I was more concerned about the fact that those were the types of slots crossing rather than the order.

But if you believe this order is most appropriate for my plan of the first 4 crosses, then I'm all ears.

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:35 am
by Dwlee99
VOTE: Gamma

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:35 am
by Ydrasse
VOTE: gamma emerald

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:37 am
by Taly
In post 5187, ulyana wrote:VOTE: ulyana
I'll elaborate on why I liked this vote.

It was during a pivotal moment where
Dwlee
could be hammered. So I doubt
Ulya
had any clear expectation on what would happen if she asserted herself to cross.

Let's look at the motivations in each possible alignment stack up with
Dwlee/Ulya
.

S/S:
Very improbable because I don't think scum would want to compete with their own buddy unnecessarily.

Dwlee
-town/
Ulya
-scum: Why wouldn't
Ulya
just join the bandwagon? It reads as uninformed of
Ulya
here because she's already stated
Dwlee
as an uncertainty in this game, so why not combat that by latching onto the glimmer of hope she could be the first to cross at the expense of someone she was less certain of?
Ulya
-scum would've been better served to shut down my push on
Dwlee
or begin to campaign for herself the moment that my crossing plan acquired ground.

Dwlee
-scum/
Ulya
-town: This makes even less sense because
Dwlee
-scum has genuinely nothing to gain by suggesting another player be the first to cross, this order of crossing is least likely to be confronted with any credible WIFOM. So
Dwlee
seeing my POV around
Ulya
as murky and wanting to use that as a method to either solve or progress the game felt genuine.

It's easiest to think that it's town/town because neither player's interactions dictate what the other does or thinks.

p-edit


I can go with
Gamma
, but I'd like to hear people chew on my assessment here.

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:38 am
by Gamma Emerald
I hadn’t thought about any order other than the pairs going across two by two.
I think the optimal strat would actually be to stagger crossings. So Ulyana should cross next, followed by me, and then Cakez.
Unless we want to branch out on this idea to include skitter+gooey, in which case I surmise 2 orders could work, either an ABCABC order (each pair sending one half across, then the other half) or perhaps ABACBC. I’d personally think ABCABC more functional. I’m postulating on this because I thought I saw something from Ydrasse accepting being a part of those left behind if we get far enough to make the plan involving all 3 pairs work and no kill happens. If I’m dreaming a little too big just let me know.
VOTE: Ulyana
I think sending her across next is my preferred option rn.

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:39 am
by Ydrasse
VOTE: ulyana

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:39 am
by Ydrasse
id be sincerely upset if i was left behind.

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:40 am
by Taly
Ydra
, why are you comfortable with
Ulya
crossing? Are they still a big question mark to you?

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:41 am
by Dwlee99
I think gamma should cross next.

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:41 am
by Ydrasse
everything is a question mark but this event feels circular without people actually crossing

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:41 am
by Dwlee99
Please make gamma cross next. Tyvm

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:42 am
by Taly
VOTE: Gamma Emerald

Only for you,
Dwlee <3

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:43 am
by Dwlee99
In post 5240, Taly wrote:VOTE: Gamma Emerald

Only for you,
Dwlee <3
ty taly ~

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:44 am
by Ydrasse
VOTE: gamma emerald

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:46 am
by petapan
VOTE: gamma emerald

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:48 am
by Gamma Emerald
I don’t want to get into the real details but doing it back-to-back is pretty scum-adjacent I think

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:49 am
by Taly
In post 5233, Gamma Emerald wrote:Unless we want to branch out on this idea to include skitter+gooey, in which case I surmise 2 orders could work, either an ABCABC order (each pair sending one half across, then the other half) or perhaps ABACBC. I’d personally think ABCABC more functional.
This is good in theory, but I want more wiggle room. I'd like
Peta/I
to cross and I'd rather not
Ydra
uncross at this point in time. But that's 9 players.

I'm also interested in
Gammagooey's
position on what the 5th seat looks like.

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:51 am
by Taly
Or, we could just do the fun route.

No set order with the pairs. Just go with where we want to wind to blow.

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:52 am
by Taly
In post 5246, Taly wrote:Or, we could just do the fun route.

No set order with the pairs. Just go with where we want to wind to blow.
This might be optimal for more reasons than one.

Gives scum less of a chance to maneuver their queue.

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:53 am
by petapan
In post 5246, Taly wrote:Or, we could just do the fun route.

No set order with the pairs. Just go with where we want to wind to blow.
that's about the way to play it i think

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 11:53 am
by Taly
In post 5245, Taly wrote:This is good in theory, but I want more wiggle room. I'd like Peta/I to cross and I'd rather not Ydra uncross at this point in time. But that's 9 players.
The unfortunate thing about this event is, this could be the winning solve. :( We always have to uncross someone we realistically think could be town.