Page 22 of 79
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 2:53 pm
by Minimal
In post 522, Majiffy wrote:
In post 520, Minimal wrote:I just spotted this...
Jiffy, explain to me the bolded parts. I don't agree with those reads in the slightest.
Jesus fuck you want me to explain five different reads? Check my ruddy ISO and come back with questions after.
How about just Ffery, Mac, and DC? I don't see reasons on any of them
DCLXVI
[4/5] - Human Destroyer, buldermar, pirate mollie, Majiffy
Minimal [2/5] - DCLXVI, Mac
buldermar [1/5] - orcinus_theoriginal
orcinus_theoriginal [1/5] - Minimal
Abstained (Not Voting): fferyllt
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 2:56 pm
by Majiffy
Ffey's recent posting seems town motivated. DCL has been a scum-read. His early voting was trash, and his reactions to pressure aren't making me feel any better. Don't remember why Mac is leaning town.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:49 pm
by buldermar
In post 511, Minimal wrote:I'm going to assume TR is another forum
Orci:
and null-town to null-scum isn't a "180" but more of a slight shift.
I want to believe in town-Mollie and Town-Jiffy but they aren't quite there yet. My scum reads are more PoE more then anything which is something that I do not want to heavily rely on.
the battle between her and Buldey early on seemed TvT though there are details that are stating otherwise, Details that Buldey had already pointed out. If you want the details that are causing me to scum-read her, I'll gladly share them.
Mac is scum for his seemingly opportunistic vote, and his somewhat opportunistic PoV on things. I took a quick look through his posts and realized that he wasn't as bad as I originally thought, though I can't help but feel that he is trying to appease people while still play the game the way he's supposed to.
What opportunistic vote? I'm not seing it at all.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 5:55 pm
by buldermar
In post 521, fferyllt wrote:@Minimal I can't reply to that. If that makes me look suspicious, so be it.
I just want to add to this that she is as far as I can tell not answering because it entails either lying or talking about an ongoing game.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:02 pm
by buldermar
I'm not liking Minimal from the last couple of posts. Many of their reads seem fabricated to me, but I havn't really figured out what exactly it is about them.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:12 pm
by Minimal
Fabricated, how so?
and the opportunistic voting I was talking about was when I hopped on to my wagon with the reason of "we're lurking"
He used the reason that we had two heads over one against us, and stated that we "disappeared" while DC was building up pressure, then theorizing that we were doing it do "run away" from the pressure that was built onto us when I Claimed V/LA in this thread and when Messiah was MIA himself.
then, when I bring it up he goes "Think what you want". He doesn't confirm or deny anything.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:16 pm
by Majiffy
Can we lynch DCL? I'm getting bored and a flip would totally help with that.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:20 pm
by Minimal
I want to talk to Messiah before we lynch anyone.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:22 pm
by Majiffy
Killin me, Smalls.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:27 pm
by fferyllt
L-1 on a V/LA player is giving me a bad case of hives.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:29 pm
by Majiffy
Pretty sure I said this before but I'll say it again.
V/LA and activity does not change a player's role PM.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:30 pm
by Majiffy
Hey they added the 1-click ISO button. Neato!
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 6:33 pm
by fferyllt
that is awesome. I am going to wear those links out.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:19 pm
by buldermar
He went on V/LA well after his wagon had begun. Do you think everyone should unvote as soon as a player goes on V/LA?
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:20 pm
by buldermar
Yeah I noticed this and was like "have I really seen this before? It seems new"...
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:22 pm
by fferyllt
In post 538, buldermar wrote:
He went on V/LA well after his wagon had begun. Do you think everyone should unvote as soon as a player goes on V/LA?
I thought he was at L-2 when he went on V/LA. If he left in that status then my hives will calm down.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:23 pm
by fferyllt
In post 350, DCLXVI wrote:@mod going to be v/la from now through thursday
~Noted
Minimal [3/5] - Majiffy, DCLXVI, Mac
DCLXVI [2/5] - Human Destroyer, buldermar
buldermar [1/5] - orcinus_theoriginal
orcinus_theoriginal [1/5] - Minimal
Abstained (Not Voting): pirate mollie, fferyllt
Actually, he was at L-3.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:56 pm
by buldermar
In post 541, fferyllt wrote: In post 350, DCLXVI wrote:@mod going to be v/la from now through thursday
~Noted
Minimal [3/5] - Majiffy, DCLXVI, Mac
DCLXVI [2/5] - Human Destroyer, buldermar
buldermar [1/5] - orcinus_theoriginal
orcinus_theoriginal [1/5] - Minimal
Abstained (Not Voting): pirate mollie, fferyllt
Actually, he was at L-3.
So?
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 7:57 pm
by buldermar
Had his wagon not begun prior to him going on V/LA?
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:01 pm
by fferyllt
accidents happen.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:06 pm
by Majiffy
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 8:07 pm
by fferyllt
yeah, yeah.
I'll get used to majority-driven wagons eventually.
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:11 pm
by buldermar
Are you faking concern? (you don't have to answer that; it's a hypothetical question for the audience)
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:12 pm
by buldermar
UNVOTE:
Posted: Thu Apr 25, 2013 2:06 am
by orcinus_theoriginal
VOTE: Majiffy
