Page 22 of 26

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:18 pm
by pitoli
Ah. I misunderstood what you meant. Italics come before the wincon. And they're in parantheses.

K leave me alone now I'm reading.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:18 pm
by Iso
In post 464, Cabd wrote:
In post 463, Iso wrote:why are we not lynching sakura

the reaction to the notscience thing was terrible and demonstrates clearly that sakura does not have a role pm
Explain?
This post:
In post 416, Sakura Hana wrote:Someone got caught by the "order of cruxis" it seems.
Sakura waited a moment to see if the notscience wagon was going to build momentum or if notscience was going to be able to pull out of it. Textbook scum hedging. Too afraid to jump on the wagon in case it got disbanded, but also wanted to leave the option open to do so, as evidenced by the above post.
In post 487, notscience wrote:
In post 484, Sakura Hana wrote:Probably because Syry replaced out. You see in Upicks it's really bad to replace out, you should kind of be attached to your character and now someone else is going to have to play with a character they didnt pick, it's one of the reasons I didn't want to replace out earlier.
I don't know the flavor
I'm pretty sure the mod suggested to me that my role has nothing to do with the character I picked.
In post 490, fferyllt wrote:Not willing to lynch (Cabd, Nati, notsci, Sakura, bork, Iso, Skullduggery)
Willing to lynch (Syr-slot, TAM, Gaiden, pitoli)
I wouldn't mind seeing Cabd die, and I'd much rather Sakura in place of Syr-slot, but that aside, this echoes my sentiments about the state of the game pretty well.
In post 498, Cabd wrote:
In post 490, fferyllt wrote:Not willing to lynch (Cabd, Nati, notsci, Sakura, bork, Iso, Skullduggery)
I get everything here except Iso. Also, why the 180 on your "the mod wifom is wifom" angle?
Iso's obvtown.
In post 499, notscience wrote:Cabd, what do you think of ISO being on a similar page to me?
If you're going to refer to me, please use "Iso" instead of "ISO" so that I know you're talking about me instead of the isolation feature. TIA
In post 521, SXTLHGaiden wrote:That's fine. I didn't want to be a part of your townblock. In fact, I'll make my own. With blackjack and hookers.
Scum can't make townblocs

shh

the big kids are talking

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:26 pm
by Cabd
In post 526, Iso wrote:
In post 464, Cabd wrote:
In post 463, Iso wrote:why are we not lynching sakura

the reaction to the notscience thing was terrible and demonstrates clearly that sakura does not have a role pm
Explain?
This post:
In post 416, Sakura Hana wrote:Someone got caught by the "order of cruxis" it seems.
Sakura waited a moment to see if the notscience wagon was going to build momentum or if notscience was going to be able to pull out of it. Textbook scum hedging. Too afraid to jump on the wagon in case it got disbanded, but also wanted to leave the option open to do so, as evidenced by the above post.
Fair enough. I don't quite see it like that, but I suppose we can revisit it.
In post 526, Iso wrote:
In post 490, fferyllt wrote:Not willing to lynch (Cabd, Nati, notsci, Sakura, bork, Iso, Skullduggery)
Willing to lynch (Syr-slot, TAM, Gaiden, pitoli)
I wouldn't mind seeing Cabd die, and I'd much rather Sakura in place of Syr-slot, but that aside, this echoes my sentiments about the state of the game pretty well.
I can feel the love. What exactly about my play makes you say I'm scum. Or is it the whole "not willing to vote sakura" thing?

In post 526, Iso wrote:
In post 498, Cabd wrote:
In post 490, fferyllt wrote:Not willing to lynch (Cabd, Nati, notsci, Sakura, bork, Iso, Skullduggery)
I get everything here except Iso. Also, why the 180 on your "the mod wifom is wifom" angle?
Iso's obvtown.
I beg to differ but hey, makes the world go around!
In post 526, Iso wrote:
In post 499, notscience wrote:Cabd, what do you think of ISO being on a similar page to me?
If you're going to refer to me, please use "Iso" instead of "ISO" so that I know you're talking about me instead of the isolation feature. TIA
Autocorrect nailed you in my case. I'll do my best to try and disable it when speaking of you. Until I ISO Iso.
In post 526, Iso wrote:
In post 521, SXTLHGaiden wrote:That's fine. I didn't want to be a part of your townblock. In fact, I'll make my own. With blackjack and hookers.
Scum can't make townblocs

shh

the big kids are talking
I lol'd.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:28 pm
by Sakura Hana
In post 526, Iso wrote:Too afraid to jump on the wagon in case it got disbanded
In post 423, Sakura Hana wrote:Eh I thought i was voting notscience for some reason...

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:30 pm
by Cabd
This post seemed weird btw, in relation to all the confotowns being created.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:34 pm
by Cabd
In post 490, fferyllt wrote:Welp. I guess I better get more serious about sorting.

Not willing to lynch (Cabd, Nati, notsci, Sakura, bork, Iso, Skullduggery)
Willing to lynch (Syr-slot, TAM, Gaiden, pitoli)

Would also consider Hanasawa because I'm not sure what to do with somebody I might not be able to evaluate for weeeeeks.
Ffery this post left off natirasha.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:35 pm
by SXTLHGaiden
no it didn't he is in the not lynch part

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:36 pm
by Cabd
Oh, he sure is. Why?

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:37 pm
by SXTLHGaiden
Not sure i can answer that one...

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:38 pm
by SXTLHGaiden
I'd ask ffery instead.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:38 pm
by Cabd
No shit, that's who I'm asking.

But hey gaiden, what's YOUR take on nati. Lynch or keep?

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:40 pm
by fferyllt
In post 530, Cabd wrote:
In post 490, fferyllt wrote:Welp. I guess I better get more serious about sorting.

Not willing to lynch (Cabd, Nati, notsci, Sakura, bork, Iso, Skullduggery)
Willing to lynch (Syr-slot, TAM, Gaiden, pitoli)

Would also consider Hanasawa because I'm not sure what to do with somebody I might not be able to evaluate for weeeeeks.
Ffery this post left off natirasha.
He's in that group because I'm not so great at reading him, so I'm not going to try hard to sort him on day 1 if it's going to be super short.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:41 pm
by Cabd
Ah. Fair enough. So this is where we have pitoli dance with us, ooor?

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:42 pm
by fferyllt
when she catches up?

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:42 pm
by SXTLHGaiden
leanin town to me. I'd say not lynch today as opposed to keep.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:43 pm
by Cabd
Which ought to be soon, ffery.

Taking applications for townblock, apply here:

Name:_______
Why are you town?:________________
Who do you think is town?:________________
Is your character really super duper cool?______________

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:44 pm
by Cabd
The pessimist in me says syr replaced out because "fuck those odds of winning as scum with confotown cabd and ffery"

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:44 pm
by SXTLHGaiden
I think you should also get a Social security number and 2 references for applications.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:45 pm
by Cabd
Me, ffery, and nati have already character claimed so far, I think. I'm okay with both of the choices sounding like something they legit chose if they are who i think they are.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:47 pm
by fferyllt
In post 541, Cabd wrote:The pessimist in me says syr replaced out because "fuck those odds of winning as scum with confotown cabd and ffery"
I have somewhat similar concerns.

p-edit I haven't character claimed.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:48 pm
by Cabd
You havent? News to me. I thought you had made it rain all over the thread.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:51 pm
by fferyllt
It was entirely unintentional if I did.

And, I think you're wrong about my character.

Does this need sorting out?

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:53 pm
by Cabd
No it's okay. It doesn't really matter. I don't think it's like Vi's games where character claiming is punished though. We COULD massclaim only characters and be fine if you really wanted to, but I think it's kinda pointless if characters and alignments aren't related. Hell, nati claimed a villain.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:56 pm
by fferyllt
In post 547, Cabd wrote:No it's okay. It doesn't really
matter
. I don't think it's like Vi's games where character claiming is punished though. We COULD massclaim only characters and be fine if you really wanted to, but I think it's kinda pointless if characters and alignments aren't related. Hell, nati claimed a villain.
Ok. I'd want to know for sure that character claiming isn't punished anyway.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 4:08 pm
by Cabd
We could just partially claim by claiming only game not character.