cxinlee knew of snscompt1 and Porkens being masons before they claimed, yet you bring up that cx was voting Pork. If any of the scum can read the mason thread, they should have long known by now that they can't keep them alive forever. That's too injurious to the scum. I think cxinlee was trying to discredit Porkens as much as possible.In post 523, Snarky wrote:Not sure of the meaning of the question.In post 521, StrangerCoug wrote:
Your rationale for cx-town makes no sense to me here, Snarky. What, exactly, do you think is precluding him from seeing sns and Porkens as a threat, given that he knew they were masons before they claimed?
What do you think that theory is?In post 527, Snarky wrote:Yeah but then why cxinlee would have said "I also have a theory I'm quite sure is true"? If cxinlee's plan, as scum, was just trying to lynch one of the masons, he wouldn't have said that. It really feels scumhunt motivated and not scum motivated.
Still would like this to be answered.In post 508, idk wrote:Is a neighborhood a somewhat common thing here on MS? (and I'd like someoneotherthan Porkens or the 4 people he mentioned to answer that)
Hey hey, would you look at that. A SiX replacement! Hopefully you'll get that reading done soon and we can see a post out of ya at some point.The Rufflig wrote:Good morning!
Reading now.
Well there's always the possibility of neighbors. That's why I want my question (and I suppose Aegor's most recent question, as well) answered.StrangerCoug wrote:cxinlee knew of snscompt1 and Porkens being masons before they claimed, yet you bring up that cx was voting Pork. If any of the scum can read the mason thread, they should have long known by now that they can't keep them alive forever. That's too injurious to the scum. I think cxinlee was trying to discredit Porkens as much as possible.In post 523, Snarky wrote:Not sure of the meaning of the question.In post 521, StrangerCoug wrote:
Your rationale for cx-town makes no sense to me here, Snarky. What, exactly, do you think is precluding him from seeing sns and Porkens as a threat, given that he knew they were masons before they claimed?
I'd rather have Pasch.In post 531, Aegor wrote:Fine with cxinlee lynch.
StrangerCoug and RedCoyote are town reads of mine. I assume there is at least one scum on this wagon, though. Leaving me a group of [Aegor, Paschendale and Snarky]Final Day One VoteCount ::
- StrangerCoug, Aegor, RedCoyote, Paschendale,Nobody SpecialSnarkyPorkens, snscompt1,
RedCoyote -Nobody Special, beastcharizard
Aegor - idk
Not Voting - cxinlee, SiX, Saki
No, you mentioned in the subthread who else had access to it. It's one of the things that was driving me crazy as I read through day 1 and tried to follow who was doing what and why. All of us knew who was able to see the thread. It was something to keep in mind while reading the interactions. StrangerCoug's IGMEOY was clearly designed to help sns live through the night (so to speak), the lack of vote signaled this fairly clearly.In post 513, Porkens wrote:No, the observing nodes were not explicitly told who all was in the thread. Only me and sns knew everything. We told them we were masons in thread, but not who all was there
I spent a lot of time looking at the masons and the other observers of the subthread. I didn't pay as much attention as I should have to nearly anyone else. I think the underlying reason is fairly obvious, but I'll state it, anyhow. The observers [cxinlee, StrangerCoug and myself] sort of form a neighborhood. It is pretty common for there to be a scum member in a neighborhood of 3 or more. After sns misplayed his hand against cx, SC took up damage control. A PR seen as town is a grave threat to the scum. A discredited PR may sometimes hang around an extra day or two. Added to the other votes against sns, SC's stated willingness to vote for sns appeared to be an attempt to keep sns in the game - on the rare chance that the scum did not already know exactly who the masons were.In post 539, Snarky wrote:The Rufflig: Why StrangerCoug town?
It involves revealing sns' role, so I'd rather not.In post 530, Paschendale wrote:Cx should tell us or face the rope.
The cat is already out of the bagIn post 543, cxinlee wrote:It involves revealing sns' role, so I'd rather not.In post 530, Paschendale wrote:Cx should tell us or face the rope.
I don't remember you saying that.In post 513, Porkens wrote:No, the observing nodes were not explicitly told who all was in the thread. Only me and sns knew everything. We told them we were masons in thread, but not who all was there.
They both claimed masons in their subsection on May 11. You voted Porkens on May 20, almost a week and a half later. Do you even give the slightest iota about this game?In post 545, cxinlee wrote:My theory: sns and porkens were in a neighborhood, so I was pretty sure 1 was scum.
I see your point here. At the same time, I don't know how scum play would differ from town play in that situation. SC couldn't vote for sns without arising suspicion on him from the masons and all the observers. Yet it really feels formulated like a warning from town... Yeah, I'll keep that in mind.In post 541, The Rufflig wrote:The Rufflig: Why StrangerCoug town?
I spent a lot of time looking at the masons and the other observers of the subthread. I didn't pay as much attention as I should have to nearly anyone else. I think the underlying reason is fairly obvious, but I'll state it, anyhow. The observers [cxinlee, StrangerCoug and myself] sort of form a neighborhood. It is pretty common for there to be a scum member in a neighborhood of 3 or more. After sns misplayed his hand against cx, SC took up damage control. A PR seen as town is a grave threat to the scum. A discredited PR may sometimes hang around an extra day or two. Added to the other votes against sns, SC's stated willingness to vote for sns appeared to be an attempt to keep sns in the game - on the rare chance that the scum did not already know exactly who the masons were.
I literally just checked.In post 547, StrangerCoug wrote:They both claimed masons in their subsection on May 11. You voted Porkens on May 20, almost a week and a half later. Do you even give the slightest iota about this game?In post 545, cxinlee wrote:My theory: sns and porkens were in a neighborhood, so I was pretty sure 1 was scum.