Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:28 am
Panther you need to open brackets before you close them.
As I said, I hope not. But please, give me some more useful input. This isn't all about the IC claim.In post 523, Florestan wrote:Karnos trust me you didn't just nail the scum team based off of that.
lol I think?In post 525, Florestan wrote:Panther you need to open brackets before you close them.
So your shadow read was/is based on ploben flipping scum, because ploben's vote in 17 didn't look like a vote on a scumbuddy. Do I have to tell you how bad it is to make a town read based on a scumread pre-flip?In post 458, Ranger wrote:This is also wrong.PantherPunt wrote:the fact that others pointed out the fallacy of her shadowguy read (the only one she's given) yet she decided not to respond to it at all is definitely interesting
I did respond.
I posted that on page one, my reason for townreading Shadow was twofold.
First, the moderror argument.
Second, because of 17 by ploben.
The former, by the mod himself, was proven to be untrue.
The latter still holds, and Shadow's play since then has cemented his spot as a townread anyway.
I have stated all of this before; none of this is new.
I can explain at any time, and probably soon, I will. (Depending on my mood.)
lol ya me trying to diffuse an argument that's been nothing but repetition of the same points and clogging up the thread is objectively scummy. can't wait to hear your explanationIn post 465, Ranger wrote:(448 is also a scum post, but I'll get into the why later. Got other things I need to do at this moment.)
There is a disconnect here that you need to address.In post 472, Ranger wrote:For Shadow_step, the initial reason I had my read has been explained. But as for why it remains even after the mod has explicitly said my reason was wrong...well, for a start, I haven't liked any of the pressure on him.
But further, his entrance into the game, 33, is something that I currently believe is something he'd be more likely to do as town than as scum, albeit only just. I really liked his inquiry towards Dunnstral in 65. Where the townread REALLY kicks in though is with 231: that isexactlywhat my issue was with Alpaca. As in, while I'll be restating it when I get to Alpaca, Shadow_step perfectly vocalized my feelings before I had actually vocalized my feelings. (This is the advantage to my readslists. He had no way of knowing that was my reasoning.) There was suspicion on ploben. Alpaca linked to something, attempting to defuse suspicion somewhat, but did literally nothing elseat all. 294 is a great continuation of the Alpaca case as well. Additionally, while he acknowledges the scumminess behind karnos, he doesnotpursue him, instead asking for support on Alpaca.
This is why he's town. He's doing his own thing, and doing it very,verywell.
I mean...ploben wasn't try-harding in RVS. He had just made several joke posts prior to post 20. Why was THAT the reason ploben became a scumread?In post 480, Ranger wrote:I'm going to skip Chip Butty unless there's actually a serious need for it. I believe he's mostly townread. I mean, I could sharemyreasons for townreading him, but not much of a point doing so when everyone is townreading him.
Instead,the reason Florestan immediately became a townread is because of 20: THIS is a reason why ploben became a scumread.I liked the follow-through in 24 as well. 52 was an excellent vote, following through and making a valid point about ploben. I also like the tone behind 80: this isn't scum trying to be helpful without being helpful (I'll show you an example ofthatlater!), this is town annoyed and calling people out. I also like 84. 163 is a fairly decent first-time encounter with me, but I really liked 165. Florestan themselves points out how the effort behind 284 was town, but some particular highlights include the BTD6 read and the ploben read. 368 and 403 also read as town ways to handle their vote. Then, we get 451, which is an excellent question.
All-in-all, Florestan is really, really town, even if Florestan's current reads kind-of suck.
ummm...they wouldn't be hypocrites (that would mean all they've done is defend themselves). Who said this by the way? I don't recall seeing anyone say you've only defended yourself so I'd appreciate if you could point those people out.
Here's a thought that I would like some comment on: Ranger as JOAT. Yes, my RVS joke again, but not joking so much this time. In fact, not joking.
It's a townie-ass tinfoil.In post 537, Chip Butty wrote:Here's a thought that I would like some comment on: Ranger as JOAT. Yes, my RVS joke again, but not joking so much this time. In fact, not joking.
This post from Ranger containing the possible codeword "ninja" appeared just six minutes after the OP. That is, when the phase 1 role-PMs were circulating, but BEFORE scum decided which extra powers they wanted and whether to recruit.
So, that kills it, right?
That's what I was thinking up until recently. But, consider this: Scum role mods are CHOSEN, while Town ones are RANDOM. That means that, even though the Mafia discussion about whether to recruit and what powers to get was still in the future when this post appeared, scum!Ranger could be virtually certain of getting JOAT simply by telling her scummate she wanted it. That means she could signal early with confidence. The timestamps turn out to be irrelevant. Why signal? Because she intended to not recruit the traitor, and thus limit the number of additional powers Town would get.
Thoughts?
I would like to comment on this after Ranger responds to it.In post 537, Chip Butty wrote:Here's a thought that I would like some comment on: Ranger as JOAT. Yes, my RVS joke again, but not joking so much this time. In fact, not joking.
This post from Ranger containing the possible codeword "ninja" appeared just six minutes after the OP. That is, when the phase 1 role-PMs were circulating, but BEFORE scum decided which extra powers they wanted and whether to recruit.
So, that kills it, right?
That's what I was thinking up until recently. But, consider this: Scum role mods are CHOSEN, while Town ones are RANDOM. That means that, even though the Mafia discussion about whether to recruit and what powers to get was still in the future when this post appeared, scum!Ranger could be virtually certain of getting JOAT simply by telling her scummate she wanted it. That means she could signal early with confidence. The timestamps turn out to be irrelevant. Why signal? Because she intended to not recruit the traitor, and thus limit the number of additional powers Town would get.
Thoughts?
Actually, you know what, screw it. I don't think it matters either way if I wait for her to respond to it. I can't imagine the response is going to reveal anything other than a pre-game post. Saying that, here is my take:In post 542, ploben wrote:I would like to comment on this after Ranger responds to it.In post 537, Chip Butty wrote:Here's a thought that I would like some comment on: Ranger as JOAT. Yes, my RVS joke again, but not joking so much this time. In fact, not joking.
This post from Ranger containing the possible codeword "ninja" appeared just six minutes after the OP. That is, when the phase 1 role-PMs were circulating, but BEFORE scum decided which extra powers they wanted and whether to recruit.
So, that kills it, right?
That's what I was thinking up until recently. But, consider this: Scum role mods are CHOSEN, while Town ones are RANDOM. That means that, even though the Mafia discussion about whether to recruit and what powers to get was still in the future when this post appeared, scum!Ranger could be virtually certain of getting JOAT simply by telling her scummate she wanted it. That means she could signal early with confidence. The timestamps turn out to be irrelevant. Why signal? Because she intended to not recruit the traitor, and thus limit the number of additional powers Town would get.
Thoughts?
lmao...I had this typed and then moved it into notepad bc I said I wanted to see Ranger respond to Chip. but since you already said it, I might as well share the text I cut from the end of that post now:In post 546, ploben wrote:Actually, you know what, screw it. I don't think it matters either way if I wait for her to respond to it. I can't imagine the response is going to reveal anything other than a pre-game post. Saying that, here is my take:In post 542, ploben wrote:I would like to comment on this after Ranger responds to it.In post 537, Chip Butty wrote:Here's a thought that I would like some comment on: Ranger as JOAT. Yes, my RVS joke again, but not joking so much this time. In fact, not joking.
This post from Ranger containing the possible codeword "ninja" appeared just six minutes after the OP. That is, when the phase 1 role-PMs were circulating, but BEFORE scum decided which extra powers they wanted and whether to recruit.
So, that kills it, right?
That's what I was thinking up until recently. But, consider this: Scum role mods are CHOSEN, while Town ones are RANDOM. That means that, even though the Mafia discussion about whether to recruit and what powers to get was still in the future when this post appeared, scum!Ranger could be virtually certain of getting JOAT simply by telling her scummate she wanted it. That means she could signal early with confidence. The timestamps turn out to be irrelevant. Why signal? Because she intended to not recruit the traitor, and thus limit the number of additional powers Town would get.
Thoughts?
I think the only way this works is that if Ranger is actually the Mafia Traitor and she is signaling to her team to pick the JOAT role as well as alert them she is the traitor, because the 2 goons obviously don't know who the traitor is. This would allow them either to pick another PR or at the very least not have to use the recruit and give town another PR.