Page 22 of 32

Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2017 7:27 pm
by mozamis
it just seemed like shade throwing
i could do assembles, its a bit of a lurker lynch but he certainly doen nothing town, decent chance of him being scum?

Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2017 8:52 pm
by Kokichi Oma
So I'm your top scumread but you are okay with lynching who I've been pushing on for 2 days? Are you saying we are teamed or what?

Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:00 pm
by northsidegal
In post 525, mozamis wrote:it just seemed like shade throwing
i could do assembles, its a bit of a lurker lynch but he certainly doen nothing town, decent chance of him being scum?
i know it's not going off of a lot, but i think assemble is town this game.

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:49 am
by Shinobi
In post 527, northsidegal wrote:
In post 525, mozamis wrote:it just seemed like shade throwing
i could do assembles, its a bit of a lurker lynch but he certainly doen nothing town, decent chance of him being scum?
i know it's not going off of a lot, but i think assemble is town this game.
I know I'm not going to believe you when you explain it, but can you explain it anyway?

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 3:55 am
by Transcend
In post 528, Shinobi wrote:
In post 527, northsidegal wrote:
In post 525, mozamis wrote:it just seemed like shade throwing
i could do assembles, its a bit of a lurker lynch but he certainly doen nothing town, decent chance of him being scum?
i know it's not going off of a lot, but i think assemble is town this game.
I know I'm not going to believe you when you explain it, but can you explain it anyway?
iuh

can't even exasperate how much i dislike this post in meaningful words

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 7:25 am
by mozamis
In post 526, Kokichi Oma wrote:Are you saying we are teamed or what?
why not

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 7:44 am
by mozamis
we need to get moving

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 7:55 am
by Sunlit Diamond
I'm pseudo-prodging one more time and then I'm back in the game. Promise.

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 8:30 am
by Shinobi
In post 529, Transcend wrote:
In post 528, Shinobi wrote:
In post 527, northsidegal wrote:
In post 525, mozamis wrote:it just seemed like shade throwing
i could do assembles, its a bit of a lurker lynch but he certainly doen nothing town, decent chance of him being scum?
i know it's not going off of a lot, but i think assemble is town this game.
I know I'm not going to believe you when you explain it, but can you explain it anyway?
iuh

can't even exasperate how much i dislike this post in meaningful words
In post 531, mozamis wrote:we need to get moving
I think I can lynch assemble but maybe nsg has a good reason why we shouldn’t?
Alternatively I can vote Transcend. If we’re not doing low content lynches then he’d probably be one of my top picks.

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 8:31 am
by Shinobi
I don’t know what happened with those quotes. Huh.
Anyhoezels.

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:07 am
by northsidegal
like i said, it's not a lot to go off of but it seems like assemble's made more of an effort to put opinions forward this game, at least for him. whereas i think he could normally just skate by on his lurker meta if he were scum, from these posts it seems like he's made just a bit more effort to look at the game:
In post 332, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 33, Kokichi Oma wrote:So how about instead of RVS. We actually start some conversation. I think Lapsa's vote looked a bit opportunistic.
In post 36, Kokichi Oma wrote:Because he didn't even say anything about it, just voted.
He RVSed someone who scumclaimed. The postcount hadn't broken double digits. You calling this opportunistic scum beggars belief.
In post 93, Kokichi Oma wrote:Also why did you point that out to just Bory? That's a bit weird.
Because Bory was the only one I saw defending him.
In post 54, Kokichi Oma wrote:
In post 49, Impede wrote:
In post 46, Kokichi Oma wrote:I just wanted to see who would have a weird reaction, and I think I found the person.
Make up your mind. I wasn't the one who suggested a PL on you page 1.

I still don't know what you were hoping to achieve. I can't see any response to that, organic or fabricated, being AI... especially because anyone in their right mind already suspects that you only posted it to stir the pot, so any reactions you get are WIFOM.
This post is a bit weird, cause I wasn't talking about you. But, the way you answered it is weird for someone you are suspicious of.
What's weird about it? He's explaining why your every action so far makes him scumread you.

You are crap-full of OMGUS and BS here, and you have the nerve to call my vote on you for that bad?
In post 460, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 446, mozamis wrote:@ assembles what r your reads?
Readlist, from town to scum:
mozamis
Lord Gurgi
Sunlit Diamond
Flavor Leaf
Lapsa
Northsidegal
Transcend
A Simple Plan
Shinobi
Kokichi Oma
VOTE: Kokichi

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:12 am
by northsidegal
i guess i'll stop "vanity voting" and vote the only likely wagon i'd be okay with going through today.
VOTE: kokichi

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 9:23 am
by Shinobi
In post 535, northsidegal wrote:like i said, it's not a lot to go off of but it seems like assemble's made more of an effort to put opinions forward this game, at least for him. whereas i think he could normally just skate by on his lurker meta if he were scum, from these posts it seems like he's made just a bit more effort to look at the game:
In post 332, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 33, Kokichi Oma wrote:So how about instead of RVS. We actually start some conversation. I think Lapsa's vote looked a bit opportunistic.
In post 36, Kokichi Oma wrote:Because he didn't even say anything about it, just voted.
He RVSed someone who scumclaimed. The postcount hadn't broken double digits. You calling this opportunistic scum beggars belief.
In post 93, Kokichi Oma wrote:Also why did you point that out to just Bory? That's a bit weird.
Because Bory was the only one I saw defending him.
In post 54, Kokichi Oma wrote:
In post 49, Impede wrote:
In post 46, Kokichi Oma wrote:I just wanted to see who would have a weird reaction, and I think I found the person.
Make up your mind. I wasn't the one who suggested a PL on you page 1.

I still don't know what you were hoping to achieve. I can't see any response to that, organic or fabricated, being AI... especially because anyone in their right mind already suspects that you only posted it to stir the pot, so any reactions you get are WIFOM.
This post is a bit weird, cause I wasn't talking about you. But, the way you answered it is weird for someone you are suspicious of.
What's weird about it? He's explaining why your every action so far makes him scumread you.

You are crap-full of OMGUS and BS here, and you have the nerve to call my vote on you for that bad?
In post 460, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 446, mozamis wrote:@ assembles what r your reads?
Readlist, from town to scum:
mozamis
Lord Gurgi
Sunlit Diamond
Flavor Leaf
Lapsa
Northsidegal
Transcend
A Simple Plan
Shinobi
Kokichi Oma
VOTE: Kokichi
How, exactly? He responded to something that happened over a week before he posted and then made a readslist with no reasoning.
How is this outside his meta?

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:49 pm
by Assemblerotws
In post 537, Shinobi wrote:
In post 535, northsidegal wrote:like i said, it's not a lot to go off of but it seems like assemble's made more of an effort to put opinions forward this game, at least for him. whereas i think he could normally just skate by on his lurker meta if he were scum, from these posts it seems like he's made just a bit more effort to look at the game:
In post 332, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 33, Kokichi Oma wrote:So how about instead of RVS. We actually start some conversation. I think Lapsa's vote looked a bit opportunistic.
In post 36, Kokichi Oma wrote:Because he didn't even say anything about it, just voted.
He RVSed someone who scumclaimed. The postcount hadn't broken double digits. You calling this opportunistic scum beggars belief.
In post 93, Kokichi Oma wrote:Also why did you point that out to just Bory? That's a bit weird.
Because Bory was the only one I saw defending him.
In post 54, Kokichi Oma wrote:
In post 49, Impede wrote:
In post 46, Kokichi Oma wrote:I just wanted to see who would have a weird reaction, and I think I found the person.
Make up your mind. I wasn't the one who suggested a PL on you page 1.

I still don't know what you were hoping to achieve. I can't see any response to that, organic or fabricated, being AI... especially because anyone in their right mind already suspects that you only posted it to stir the pot, so any reactions you get are WIFOM.
This post is a bit weird, cause I wasn't talking about you. But, the way you answered it is weird for someone you are suspicious of.
What's weird about it? He's explaining why your every action so far makes him scumread you.

You are crap-full of OMGUS and BS here, and you have the nerve to call my vote on you for that bad?
In post 460, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 446, mozamis wrote:@ assembles what r your reads?
Readlist, from town to scum:
mozamis
Lord Gurgi
Sunlit Diamond
Flavor Leaf
Lapsa
Northsidegal
Transcend
A Simple Plan
Shinobi
Kokichi Oma
VOTE: Kokichi
How, exactly? He responded to something that happened over a week before he posted and then made a readslist with no reasoning.
How is this outside his meta?
Because I ISOed everyone to make that readslist in the first place.

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:53 pm
by Sunlit Diamond
In post 526, Kokichi Oma wrote:So I'm your top scumread but you are okay with lynching who I've been pushing on for 2 days? Are you saying we are teamed or what?
I'm no longer over gamed. Expect better play from me.

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:53 pm
by Sunlit Diamond
Er. Not sure why it quoted Kokichi

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 3:28 pm
by Transcend
VOTE: Shinobi

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 4:05 pm
by mozamis
no vote ko

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 4:43 pm
by Kokichi Oma
Don't see the reasoning for voting shinobi. I actually this this is a better vote now. VOTE: mozamis Don't buy his reasoning for thinking me and assemble could be teamed. Not really sure I care if it's me vs shinobi at this point, I'm voting the person I think is most likely scum.

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 4:46 pm
by northsidegal
In post 539, Sunlit Diamond wrote:
In post 526, Kokichi Oma wrote:So I'm your top scumread but you are okay with lynching who I've been pushing on for 2 days? Are you saying we are teamed or what?
I'm no longer over gamed. Expect better play from me.
please try to get into it as soon as possible - i'm doing pretty rough this game and hopefully some more discussion can fix that.

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:39 pm
by Sunlit Diamond
Define "doing pretty rough."

I don't have a clue what's going on, rereading now.

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:42 pm
by Shinobi
In post 538, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 537, Shinobi wrote:
In post 535, northsidegal wrote:like i said, it's not a lot to go off of but it seems like assemble's made more of an effort to put opinions forward this game, at least for him. whereas i think he could normally just skate by on his lurker meta if he were scum, from these posts it seems like he's made just a bit more effort to look at the game:
In post 332, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 33, Kokichi Oma wrote:So how about instead of RVS. We actually start some conversation. I think Lapsa's vote looked a bit opportunistic.
In post 36, Kokichi Oma wrote:Because he didn't even say anything about it, just voted.
He RVSed someone who scumclaimed. The postcount hadn't broken double digits. You calling this opportunistic scum beggars belief.
In post 93, Kokichi Oma wrote:Also why did you point that out to just Bory? That's a bit weird.
Because Bory was the only one I saw defending him.
In post 54, Kokichi Oma wrote:
In post 49, Impede wrote:
In post 46, Kokichi Oma wrote:I just wanted to see who would have a weird reaction, and I think I found the person.
Make up your mind. I wasn't the one who suggested a PL on you page 1.

I still don't know what you were hoping to achieve. I can't see any response to that, organic or fabricated, being AI... especially because anyone in their right mind already suspects that you only posted it to stir the pot, so any reactions you get are WIFOM.
This post is a bit weird, cause I wasn't talking about you. But, the way you answered it is weird for someone you are suspicious of.
What's weird about it? He's explaining why your every action so far makes him scumread you.

You are crap-full of OMGUS and BS here, and you have the nerve to call my vote on you for that bad?
In post 460, Assemblerotws wrote:
In post 446, mozamis wrote:@ assembles what r your reads?
Readlist, from town to scum:
mozamis
Lord Gurgi
Sunlit Diamond
Flavor Leaf
Lapsa
Northsidegal
Transcend
A Simple Plan
Shinobi
Kokichi Oma
VOTE: Kokichi
How, exactly? He responded to something that happened over a week before he posted and then made a readslist with no reasoning.
How is this outside his meta?
Because I ISOed everyone to make that readslist in the first place.
I'm so impressed.
I'd be even more impressed if you explained them instead of just posting a list of names that means nothing to me.

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:42 pm
by northsidegal
In post 545, Sunlit Diamond wrote:Define "doing pretty rough."

I don't have a clue what's going on, rereading now.
not really sure how to contribute or advance the game in a meaningful way.

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 6:08 pm
by Sunlit Diamond
NSG, your play this time seems pretty defensive (as in, defensive of others), whereas the newbie game you were in that I read, you were pretty single minded in your pursuit of your scumread. What's the difference here / who are your scum reads other than KO? If you already said you can just link me the post.

Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2017 7:28 pm
by Dunkerdoodles
-