Mafiascum.net

In post 503, Irrelephant11 wrote:alright cool

H

e

y

t

o

w

n

i

f

y

o

u

'

r

e

r

e

a

d

y

t

o

l

o

s

e

s

h

e

e

p

m

e

a

n

d

s

h

o

s

h

i

n

we're scumbuddies and are trying to mislead you

In post 524, Keyser Söze wrote:Again, there is nothing in the rule book against using two other players to resolve your inner conflict.
"Correct"? Nothing is correct right now. They just have to convince me, and I need to convince myself. Weird question.

In post 522, skitter30 wrote:For right now:
{}
{stun}
{shoshin, bernie}
{nsg, irrelephant, invsibility, nauci} -- null
{mom, gamma}
{math}
{duckling}
{}

In post 522, skitter30 wrote:

In post 501, Shoshin wrote:Nah, if scum isn't Nauci/Skitter/the worst, it's probably between Gamma/NSG.

this is

just

like a list of most of the people that are generally percieved to be sketchy

In post 531, Shoshin wrote:

In post 522, skitter30 wrote:

In post 501, Shoshin wrote:Nah, if scum isn't Nauci/Skitter/the worst, it's probably between Gamma/NSG.

this is

just

like a list of most of the people that are generally percieved to be sketchy

What do you mean by "just"? I think most of my townreads agree with me, but I don't see anything wrong with that. Do you?

In post 533, skitter30 wrote:

In post 531, Shoshin wrote:

In post 522, skitter30 wrote:

In post 501, Shoshin wrote:Nah, if scum isn't Nauci/Skitter/the worst, it's probably between Gamma/NSG.

this is

just

like a list of most of the people that are generally percieved to be sketchy

What do you mean by "just"? I think most of my townreads agree with me, but I don't see anything wrong with that. Do you?

i don't know what your townreads have to do with this. it's a list of consensus-scummy players. it's very safe.

In post 536, Shoshin wrote:

In post 533, skitter30 wrote:

In post 531, Shoshin wrote:

In post 522, skitter30 wrote:

In post 501, Shoshin wrote:Nah, if scum isn't Nauci/Skitter/the worst, it's probably between Gamma/NSG.

this is

just

like a list of most of the people that are generally percieved to be sketchy

What do you mean by "just"? I think most of my townreads agree with me, but I don't see anything wrong with that. Do you?

i don't know what your townreads have to do with this. it's a list of consensus-scummy players. it's very safe.

You think my reads are "safe"? That's just wrong. I've clearly stuck my neck out in defending certain players who aren't perceived as town (e.g. Mom/

Invis

), and I've given some strong townreads on players who aren't perceived as strong town (e.g. Math/Irrelephant), so why interpret my reads as "safe" instead of "maybe there's something to this because all the likely townies are coming to a consensus"?

In post 534, Momrangal wrote:I'm a consensus scummy player this game and I remain off that list

In post 527, skitter30 wrote:It basically makes me feel like you're using the two of them as a proxy to figure it out.

In post 513, Momrangal wrote:Irrelephant11
Shoshin
stungun0404
Keyser Soze

Mathdino
Bernie

Nauci
the worst
northsidegal*
Invisibility

Gamma Emerald
skitter

In post 537, Shoshin wrote:

In post 536, Shoshin wrote:

In post 533, skitter30 wrote:

In post 531, Shoshin wrote:

In post 522, skitter30 wrote:

In post 501, Shoshin wrote:Nah, if scum isn't Nauci/Skitter/the worst, it's probably between Gamma/NSG.

this is

just

like a list of most of the people that are generally percieved to be sketchy

What do you mean by "just"? I think most of my townreads agree with me, but I don't see anything wrong with that. Do you?

i don't know what your townreads have to do with this. it's a list of consensus-scummy players. it's very safe.

You think my reads are "safe"? That's just wrong. I've clearly stuck my neck out in defending certain players who aren't perceived as town (e.g. Mom/

Invis

), and I've given some strong townreads on players who aren't perceived as strong town (e.g. Math/Irrelephant), so why interpret my reads as "safe" instead of "maybe there's something to this because all the likely townies are coming to a consensus"?

Fixing a mistake.

In post 269, Shoshin wrote:I like to lynch scum on D1 and anything less feels like a failure to me.

Bernie's tough to read. Lots of nothingness but there's a hint of town in the way he helped me pressure Stun but then switched onto Invis because he couldn't maintain the farce. Even if Bernie's really strong as scum, I'm not sure he'd express that sentiment while switching his vote onto obvious lynchbait. So probably not lynching Bernie today.

I'm varying degrees of town on Math, Invis, Key, Mom, and Irrelephant. Stun's a weaker read but for the moment happy to put aside. So I'm thinking we need to sort out Gamma, NSG, Skitter, Nauci, and the worst.

In post 542, Shoshin wrote:Skitter's scumread on Math is pretty fucking bad, and given her recent concern about "safe" reads, I'm thinking it's an attempt to appear "non-safe." I find it hard to believe that town Skitter lists Math as scummier than her null reads.

In post 541, Keyser Söze wrote:

In post 527, skitter30 wrote:It basically makes me feel like you're using the two of them as a proxy to figure it out.

Correct.

Is that scummy though?

In post 542, Shoshin wrote:Skitter's scumread on Math is pretty fucking bad, and given her recent concern about "safe" reads, I'm thinking it's an attempt to appear "non-safe." I find it hard to believe that town Skitter lists Math as scummier than her null reads.

In post 543, Keyser Söze wrote:Why is Gamma down there?