Mafiascum.net

Im doubling down on my Leo scum read right now

Hey my V/LA just ended

I will be catching up tomorrow, too tired to catch up tonight

In post 522, Edosurist wrote:^Why did you list the post count for each person?

it's just a habit for me; sometimes peopels postcounts affect my read on them and sometimes it helps me notice things like if all of my wolfreads have almost no posts or way more than my townreads then somethings usually wrong

In post 524, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:If I am somehow wrong about Varsoon, how does that make me wolf?

even if varsoon is villa, i dont feel comfortable with how consistently confident you were that he was villa off of such little reasoning despite such a large wagon and so many things being said against him

hot take: sheep/varsoon s/s

that's right
u herd me

In post 523, Wisdom wrote:potato = newbscum

So no reason not to kill it then?

I can very well see sheep being scum too. His latest posts seem really panicky when brought up against Varoon there, and that large post of his basically made no sense to me, dunno if it did for anyone else.

How did Varsoon react poorly to pressure, sheep?

VOTE: Sheep

i scumread them off a similar premis where they were posting a lot and had a pretty noticable thread presence but after a more in depth look no content or solving
a wagon suddenly appeared on them after i tried pushing my uncomfort there for a bit, and soon they were really high up in votes
that original high posting high impact at point 1 is gone and they immediately drop in activity/wim/confidence and panic and go into posting to try to survive mode

this is the textbook wolf response to pressure when theyre getting by with a majority being comfortable/v reading them until a wagon suddenly appears

and it's exactly what varsoon did

@purr why do you think that

@hebi can you go more into depth about what you thought was panicky?


because i might be biased? but both of your two takes are like the opposite of what i'd expect someone to see there

Maybe it's just how I read your grammar.

But why would you phrase it as "What I'd expect someone to see there" and not "What my intent was?"

In post 485, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 374, Gamma Emerald wrote:my problem with waiting for others to contribute is then the more active people clog up the game thread
that's why I advocate for faster early days

But mislynches are most common in early days.

mislynchs help town D1 anyway? Faster D1 isnt always bad.

People are scumreading Leo for shallow posts I assume?

In post 533, hebichan wrote:Maybe it's just how I read your grammar.

But why would you phrase it as "What I'd expect someone to see there" and not "What my intent was?"

because i can say something some way, it could be perceived differently, and i would probably not scumread for it

but im just struggling to see how someone else objectively would get that thought and your answer is pretty deficient

anyway i read the leo game that was linked earlier where he was town and there's some? small semblance of his not always on topic posts but in comparison to this game there's way more real pure wanting to solve/genuine interest in solving

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=77673

read his iso here alongside that one (a town game) for anyone who is still skeptical about leo being scum

and a fast d1 is definitely better imo


i think towns consistently tend to start strong and sort of drop off and the day phase will just drag on/be easy for scum to take over and influence if it goes on too long

In post 528, sheepsaysmeep wrote:

In post 524, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:If I am somehow wrong about Varsoon, how does that make me wolf?

even if varsoon is villa, i dont feel comfortable with how consistently confident you were that he was villa off of such little reasoning despite such a large wagon and so many things being said against him

And this is somehow unusual for me to do as town?

There was a large wagon against town!you in God knows how many games, I’ve played with you. Did you consider it scummy that I stuck to my guns and hard defended you, despite other players disagreeing with me?

Because I don’t really believe you find this scummy from me. I always put my own reads above anything else. This post is pinging me a bit.

In post 530, hebichan wrote:

In post 523, Wisdom wrote:potato = newbscum

So no reason not to kill it then?

I can very well see sheep being scum too. His latest posts seem really panicky when brought up against Varoon there, and that large post of his basically made no sense to me, dunno if it did for anyone else.

How did Varsoon react poorly to pressure, sheep?

VOTE: Sheep

Waffely sheep=town
Tunnelly sheep=scum

That’s how you can tell the difference.

530 was pretty scummy tbh. Why wouldn't town lynch scum just because they're newbscum?

In post 541, CheekyTeeky wrote:530 was pretty scummy tbh. Why wouldn't town lynch scum just because they're newbscum?

Didn’t she say, “no reason not to kill it then”?

my sensors have finished calibrating and determined that the game is going too slow to not vote someone who i think is likely either jester or scum

VOTE: leodanny

for the record xtomx leo and Jay are all pretty fantastic votes at the moment imo

if i had an order preference it'd prob be like jay->leo->xtomx but tbf to him xtomx is being non-existent in the neighborhood too which is v. disappointing but prob doesn't make him much more likely scum than his thread posts on their own

this thread has definitely slowed down by a concerning amount yeah



can i have other peoples thoughts on hebi? my recent interaction made with them made me feel pretty uncomfortable with them and realize that theyve sort of just been unconsciously not in my radar so far but i feel like i might be a bit confbiased here

In post 542, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 541, CheekyTeeky wrote:530 was pretty scummy tbh. Why wouldn't town lynch scum just because they're newbscum?

Didn’t she say, “no reason not to kill it then”?

I guess you're right... but then she votes sheep? Her actions and words seem to be doing two different things.

In post 545, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 542, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 541, CheekyTeeky wrote:530 was pretty scummy tbh. Why wouldn't town lynch scum just because they're newbscum?

Didn’t she say, “no reason not to kill it then”?

I guess you're right... but then she votes sheep? Her actions and words seem to be doing two different things.

thats actually a good point

meh i had some short second thoughts on cheeky last night for a bit but by now im pretty sure again that both of her and nancy are always town here

In post 545, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 542, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 541, CheekyTeeky wrote:530 was pretty scummy tbh. Why wouldn't town lynch scum just because they're newbscum?

Didn’t she say, “no reason not to kill it then”?

I guess you're right... but then she votes sheep? Her actions and words seem to be doing two different things.

Cheeky, you complain I do this in every game I'm in.

I jump votes around, it's how I do.

Tis true. One day I'll be right though.