Mafiascum.net

In post 523, Gentleman 4 wrote:My beloved misty still hasn’t accepted my invitation. I am feeling what can only be described as teen angst

Give her a water Pokemon!
She is usually accepting of people who do that.

In post 503, Gentleman 3 wrote:I mean I think it's pretty clear-cut?
I ask for clarification in 350
G6 calls my questioning bad and heavily implies that it's scummy in 354 and 356
I defend my question by telling G6 that he shouldn't be ambiguous in 362
I later explain that I only wanted a clarification (372)

Personally I don’t trust Gentleman 6.
If he doesn’t make himself “69” then I’ll tell Piplup to use bubble beam on him!

If you don't trust me, why do you want me paired with a universal townread?

In post 527, Gentleman 6 wrote:If you don't trust me, why do you want me paired with a universal townread?

“69”

In post 529, Gentleman 8 wrote:

Fashionably late of course, friends. I do say, this shall be a splendid affair. Absolutely spiffing!

Hi Michael

In post 525, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 523, Gentleman 4 wrote:My beloved misty still hasn’t accepted my invitation. I am feeling what can only be described as teen angst

Give her a water Pokemon!
She is usually accepting of people who do that.

I shall give her my prized tododile

In post 530, Gentleman 4 wrote:

In post 529, Gentleman 8 wrote:

Fashionably late of course, friends. I do say, this shall be a splendid affair. Absolutely spiffing!

Hi Michael

In post 532, Gentleman 8 wrote:

In post 530, Gentleman 4 wrote:

In post 529, Gentleman 8 wrote:

Fashionably late of course, friends. I do say, this shall be a splendid affair. Absolutely spiffing!

Hi Michael

Good day, Deputy Grimes! I hadn't expected to see you here, but it is pleasant to see you again. My, my, you do clean up nicely. Tell me, is that a Python in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

Dose the Good Place accept people now?

In post 482, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 475, Gentleman 1 wrote:

In post 370, Gentleman 4 wrote:

In post 369, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'm a watt?

This is just too good. Well played, both of you.

I'm afraid not. Older Harry is a Joule of my eye.

Very clever as well.

In post 483, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 454, Gentleman 6 wrote:

In post 452, Lady 3 wrote:Gent 6 are you thinking of pairing with Lady 8?

May I ask why you're asking this question?

“69”

This joke is starting to get old. I noticed you barely posted anything of relevance and checked out rather quickly, cannot say I am a fan of that.

In post 494, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 480, Gentleman 1 wrote:Outside of some small concerns about Celeste I have practically no solid suspicions at this moment.

Interesting. Want to talk about this?

I had a small feeling some of what Celeste was expressing didn’t feel genuine, I believe.

In post 536, Gentleman 1 wrote:

In post 482, Lady 6 wrote:

In post 475, Gentleman 1 wrote:

In post 370, Gentleman 4 wrote:

In post 369, Gentleman 6 wrote:I'm a watt?

This is just too good. Well played, both of you.

I'm afraid not. Older Harry is a Joule of my eye.

Very clever as well.

In post 483, Lady 5 wrote:

In post 454, Gentleman 6 wrote:

In post 452, Lady 3 wrote:Gent 6 are you thinking of pairing with Lady 8?

May I ask why you're asking this question?

“69”

This joke is starting to get old. I noticed you barely posted anything of relevance and checked out rather quickly, cannot say I am a fan of that.

If you have any questions I said just ask.
I’ll be able to be more aggressive on Friday.
Right now I’m busy.

In post 537, Gentleman 1 wrote:

In post 494, Gentleman 3 wrote:

In post 480, Gentleman 1 wrote:Outside of some small concerns about Celeste I have practically no solid suspicions at this moment.

Interesting. Want to talk about this?

I had a small feeling some of what Celeste was expressing didn’t feel genuine, I believe.

So which lady would you ask out?

Also @Gent 1

What made you want to respond to Gent 6’s Post?
Did you just want to point out you are getting sick of my joke? :l

In post 498, Gentleman 3 wrote:362 was me being annoyed about G6 getting on my case for asking for clarification. Had nothing to do with the actual thing I asked clarification on.

In post 499, Gentleman 3 wrote:If any part of that exchange was an attack, it was 356. That's pretty pointedly implying that there's something bad about my question.

I’m inclined to agree with this perspective.

In post 541, Gentleman 1 wrote:

In post 498, Gentleman 3 wrote:362 was me being annoyed about G6 getting on my case for asking for clarification. Had nothing to do with the actual thing I asked clarification on.

In post 499, Gentleman 3 wrote:If any part of that exchange was an attack, it was 356. That's pretty pointedly implying that there's something bad about my question.

I’m inclined to agree with this perspective.

This is why I like Gentleman 3 the most! :3

In post 511, Lady 5 wrote:Also just saying.
If “69” doesn’t become a couple, I’ll be disappointed and I’ll question both of them with everything I got.
They better be ready to defend themselves.
You haven’t seen anything yet.

Why are you so eager to see that pairing, is it only because of the dirty number? I do like that you are trying to provide some content here, though.

Here’s how I would order everyone.

Gentleman 1 - Lady 8
Gentleman 2 - Lady 7
Gentleman 3 - Myself
Gentleman 4 - Lady 3
Gentleman 5 - Lady 2
Gentleman 6 - Lady 9
Gentleman 7 - Lady 1 or 6
Gentleman 8 - Lady 4

In post 543, Gentleman 1 wrote:

In post 511, Lady 5 wrote:Also just saying.
If “69” doesn’t become a couple, I’ll be disappointed and I’ll question both of them with everything I got.
They better be ready to defend themselves.
You haven’t seen anything yet.

Why are you so eager to see that pairing, is it only because of the dirty number? I do like that you are trying to provide some content here, though.

That and I don’t want to take a risk that the Host was biased. He could have decided to not RNG Gent 6 and Lady 9.
Although I’m probably wrong there but when something sticks in my mind, I always consider it as a possibility.

It also makes it easy late game if “69” is both mafia, we take out 2 mafia without having to worry about losing a Town Member.

If both Gent 1 and Lady 8 are town.
They will by far be the power house town needs to win.
The reason Gent 2 should go with Lady 7 is because Lady 7 is feel could be the most possible Deep Wolf so making the confirmed Town partners with them could help in the long run.
As for Gent 5 with Gent 2 I also feel another power house town can be made.
With both their play style’s together it can make with some good late game solving

L5 is both better and worse this page than previously.