Page 22 of 50

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:31 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Just look at my ISO and ctrl f Naery.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:33 am
by Xtoxm
VC 2.1
[1] Datisi:
NorwegianboyEE

[6] Not Voting:
Naerys, Non Imh, Map Wolf, Ph0enix, Saladman27, Datisi

With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch


The Day 2 deadline is in
: (expired on 2020-01-13 18:21:44)

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:47 am
by Datisi
In post 500, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 498, Non lmh wrote:I hardclaim mason mafia wont shoot me no balls
I unironically like this post.
Don’t think Non Imh is scum.
Er, what does "unironically" liking a Mason claim mean?

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:49 am
by NorwegianboyEE
I thought he was joking at first, and i TR him for that. But then i realized he was being serious.
But either way, i was right about him being a TR. Ta ta.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:50 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Your attempt at finding fake associations between me and Naery's is intensifying my scumread on you.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:52 am
by Datisi
Okay, went through the ISO. First it was think Naerys is Town due to the similarity to the previous game, then you don't like her play and you thought she was either scum or a counterwagon to GBJ (who flipped Town), then it's "seems like she's Town" and Naerys reaction to our start of Day 2 seeme Townie.

So... if you could expand what the thoughts on the wagons are now and what about her reaction "seemed Townie", I'd appreciate it.

pedit: do you not see how your attempts to find associations between me/Salad can come off the same way?

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:57 am
by Ph0enix
In post 520, Datisi wrote:
In post 504, Ph0enix wrote:Now that I wrote it all down, I still don't know which one was a better idea to begin with. So I'm not sure how everyone seemed to be to certain in defending one side of this argument. I agree I might be missing out on something here, but still.
Look at how many cases there are in which scum and Mason cc each other. Trading a PR for scum is always +town. Meanwhile, if the Mason claims unprompted with no cc, they just die.
That's a fair statement.

@Norway (addressing and ): I can see where your concerns are coming from but I need more information on this, as I said. Also, I also went through your ISO and I, for some reason, still don't get why you TR Naerys. So basically what I'm asking for is for you to explain a bit further.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 6:59 am
by Naerys
In post 530, Datisi wrote:First it was think Naerys is Town due to the similarity to the previous game, then you don't like her play and you thought she was either scum or a counterwagon to GBJ (who flipped Town), then it's "seems like she's Town" and Naerys reaction to our start of Day 2 seeme Townie.
When you put it like this, it sounds suspicious.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:04 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Regarding the previous day, GBJ was a failed lead that would only lead to further mislynches, hence the game needed to be reread with the thought of GBJ/Kanna/Non Imh being town in mind.
Naery' doesn't seem like she has any agenda mind with any of her posts. I don't think she's expressed a TR on anyone except me. And i know i'm town. She is distrusting, quick to anger and acting like a total newb with some bad argumentation that proves she's not playing to be townread, but playing to solve. Again, that usually comes from town, not scum.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:06 am
by Datisi
In post 533, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't think she's expressed a TR on anyone except me. And i know i'm town.
And this is Town indicative because...?

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:07 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Just subconciously push out the POV arguments, i always include them.
Why are you ignoring everything else i said in that post?

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:13 am
by Datisi
I genuinely don't get how that is Town indicative for Naerys even from town!you POV.

Because that seemed like the biggest flaw in your arguments and I didn't feel like replying to every single sentence.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:15 am
by Ph0enix
@Naerys: Current reads?

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:17 am
by Ph0enix
In post 533, NorwegianboyEE wrote:She is distrusting, quick to anger and acting like a total newb with some bad argumentation that proves she's not playing to be townread, but playing to solve. Again, that usually comes from town, not scum.
Any other reason for townreading her except that one?

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:19 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Nah it's mostly a gut read. And i don't see any strong associatives, except maybe Phoenix. But if Phoenix is scum we've pretty much lost already i think.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:24 am
by Datisi
In post 536, Datisi wrote:I genuinely don't get how that is Town indicative for Naerys even from town!you POV.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:27 am
by Ph0enix
In post 539, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Nah it's mostly a gut read.
Well, you could've said that from the start. A gut read cannot be treated the same way as a legit read.
In post 539, NorwegianboyEE wrote:And i don't see any strong associatives, except maybe Phoenix.
Associatives, as in other townreads? Weren't you townreading Non, or I am mistaken?
In post 539, NorwegianboyEE wrote:But if Phoenix is scum we've pretty much lost already i think.
Lmao. I'll take that as a compliment.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:28 am
by NorwegianboyEE
There's also the fact i looked into her previous game and it seemed relatively similar to her play in this one.
Although i might revisit it when i'm feeling more motivated to see if it still holds up.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:29 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 541, Ph0enix wrote:Associatives
Scum team association.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:29 am
by NorwegianboyEE
As in.
Pairing player X with Y and recognizing them as scum partners.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:29 am
by Datisi
VOTE: Norwegian

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:30 am
by NorwegianboyEE
If players are playing with a "individualistic mindset" where they don't care who they lynch or go after, it is usually town indicative because it proves they don't have an agenda of protecting their teammate.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:31 am
by NorwegianboyEE
In post 545, Datisi wrote:VOTE: Norwegian
Took you long enough.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:36 am
by Naerys
In post 537, Ph0enix wrote:@Naerys: Current reads?
Right now i am trying to heal myself from Norwegian and Datisi arguing with each other.

Non is town.

I´d like to get more from Map Wolf - he has whole 1 post at day 2.
Saladman aswell.
And there is Datisi vs Norwegian, which kind of annoys one. Not sure if scum would try to annoy players like that.

Btw it´s funny how Datisi and Norwegian are already over 100 posts. I doubt that indicates anything, but they certainly are very active.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2020 7:38 am
by Datisi
Indicates i like posting and/or have a bit too much free time.