Posted: Sat Jun 06, 2020 4:45 pm
i feel my filler level is getting pretty high. maybe gonna do iso cases of people or something like nightless.
but who do i choose to be the one who decides who i iso.
Okay you startIn post 529, Pink Ball wrote:Ooooooh that's fun we should all play 2 trues 1 lie!!
I think it's a weird thing to say without context so I understand skitter's point. But the context is that I'm really not in the mood to be wrongly scumread.In post 496, Menalque wrote:I don’t see it. I think it’s a pretty normal thing for Pb to say (and that’s part of why I <3 him)In post 494, skitter30 wrote:it's a weird thing to sayIn post 491, Menalque wrote:I don’t really see this either, how is this weird?In post 464, skitter30 wrote:this is a weird postIn post 323, Pink Ball wrote:Firepup I'm not in the mood of being scumread could you not do it please?
Will you ever reach that confidence, Dustybun?? We did a great job in that newbie we repped in, I'd love to reach thatIn post 498, Menalque wrote:Nb: the never ending story can continue just as soon as I reach full confidence you aren’t scum, pure boi
You're just using buzz and filler words. This also isn't a post you make if you strongly consider me scum. Even if you caught me for the wrong reasons last time you were very passionate about your read on me. This? Not even close.
This is fair.In post 513, Menalque wrote:@blake I’m happy for you to sit back if it helps you to get a better grasp on the game but I’d like you have offered hard takes on as many slots as possible when we’re halfway - 70% of the way to deadline
Would that work for you?
i think menal is genuinely sad we started having the discussion/fight we did that soon into the game but i don't think it's as AI as i would like to thinkIn post 333, Menalque wrote:Unless I’m mistaken, datisi isn’t actually scumreading me rn just objecting to my claim that I can read her well
o shit we were gonna be teammatesIn post 345, Bingle wrote:Well, I got a cult PM in EISAL2, but that was mod abandoned before I could post in the main thread, so I don't think it counts.
ok, then why did you say something like "this is what i expect scum!bingle to post" or whatever it wasIn post 346, Menalque wrote:I read some of detective penguin when I was in c9++ I think, but I haven’t been scum with bingle, no
the vote is sorta semi-serious i guessIn post 391, Bingle wrote:Contextually I think the continued vote after their interactions implies a scumread, but Dats can clear that up when she gets back.
we only played in 1992 and pyp, no?In post 462, skitter30 wrote:what about me ????In post 249, Datisi wrote:i have 0-2 games played with everyone here
rereading, did you really think i was picking a fight (assuming that's what that means)? and what does that tell you?In post 269, Menalque wrote:I don’t really feel like fighting and honestly it feels like that’s sort of what you’re spoiling for @dats
No read on mena and i'm not sure that scum!gobble starts by picking a fight with jingleIn post 541, Datisi wrote:also, do you have a read on mena yet and why is gobble maybe town?
I want to check whether my own perception of bingle’s take on our interaction as bad faith is accurate, and then to get people to vote him if they agree it was a bad faith representation of what happened between us because I don’t have memories of town!bingoe acting in bad faith (which re: your other point — I’ve played with town!bingle in at least 3 games and this feels sort of different. Then again, that might be bc I was scum in all those other games, which is why I want to check the accuracy of my perception)In post 541, Datisi wrote:mena what are you hoping to achieve with asking everyone how they're reading our interaction and bingle's interpretation