Mafiascum.net

Chesskid did not get banned for harassment hahaha I know the guy in real life.

NS wheres your head at this game? Besides me

In the banned list by zito it says he got perma banned here for harassment and a lot of other rule breaking.
But this is a minor side thing.

idk.

I feel like Andres is scummy but I tend to believe people when asked about their favorite alignments and I think hes been too present for him to be scum.

I dont think Bell is scum. I liked Clarity's posting and I didn't hate his entrance like Andres did.

I'm back and forth on Bulge and Bella. I know Bella does better one on one and I understand where shes coming from with it being hard to engage Our but I don't feel like you're difficult to engage with, IV. So that's weird. Bulge is doing just enough i feel like too but I know thats hypocritical.

Our is very wagon happy. I'm kinda curious which alignment he prefers to play as but I found a weird disconnect between you and Nash being in his three strongest townreads but then later saying he struggles to read you guys.

Still liked Nash's posting.

Walter- idk. I liked him following up on his earlier questioning but I feel like there had to have been scum on that four man IV wagon earlier.

Just reading his first game, Andre has 700ish posts there.
So him being somewhat present is his bare minimum.

Unclear to me what the reasons behind Chess getting banned have anything to do with the game. Outside of whatever got him banned, he’s actually pretty good at the game itself.

In post 530, Andresvmb wrote:Unclear to me what the reasons behind Chess getting banned have anything to do with the game. Outside of whatever got him banned, he’s actually pretty good at the game itself.

Agree. It was a stray thought. Let’s move on.

In post 528, notscience wrote:I understand where shes coming from with it being hard to engage Our but I don't feel like you're difficult to engage with, IV. So that's weird

i think if someone tries to engage with me it's easy. you try to engage me so it might feel easy for you. bella never really tried except that one time and I find it hard to believe she found it hard to engage with me that one time. also if you catch me in a memey mood i can be an ambient noise presence

I think iv is just very... bouncy? I feel like you have a lot!of! thoughts! And I can't always parse them into a sensible order. I should ask you more questions, though. I think iv has got a lot more town as today has gone on.

What do you make of Nash's voting quirk?

VOTE: andrevamb

I read all his scum games and 2 of his town games, just skimmed though.
I didn’t see anything that made me think that he can’t be scum this game.

In post 533, Bellaphant wrote:What do you make of Nash's voting quirk?

huh

I learned stuff.

He has two scum modes. The unsure one he isn’t playing as but the more aggressive, confident one he could be. That’s fairly difficult to differentiate from his town games though. He’s more excited, happy, and sort of side chatty when he’s town.
He posts a lot as either alignment.
His ‘haha’ thing is just a thing he does. So, I won’t read into it.but one day in the future I will be able to differentiate between his town hahas and his scum hahas.

Probably not.

In post 477, Bellaphant wrote:

@mod, any chance of an extension, seeing as we've had 1/3 of the game replace? Even til the end of the Weeknd?

3rd.

Thank you mod.
@Iv do you make anything of it?
@ Bell since you read those games, was the posting style different?

slightly shorter posts. I did not really read the set up or times in that game, I looked at post count, tone, how he talked to people as both alignments. Post length is probably NAI I have a feeling those games were shorter but I did not check.

I already mentioned the summary of my observations half his scum games he acted lost and down.
Other half confident and aggressive.
He seemed more side talky and cheerful when he rolls town. But still fairly confident and aggressive.

Alright, Thanks, posting style was different on a different site and that seems to be a good answer.

In post 539, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:@Iv do you make anything of it?

what are you referring to?

I did not make that clear.
535 about the nash vote quirk?

as i said in 535 i dont' know what you and bella are talking about

The posts referred to are 305 306 and 380 381 .
Those are the nash double votes.

Correction on the post tags.
305
380

Those link to the first of the double votes.

VOTE: andres

Wagon ho

Page