Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:53 pm
and honestly looking at the player list I don't think there's anyone I'd rather gladiate with more than you <3
I really don't see how what I said could be interpreted as being toxic - I apologize if I offended you in any way. I just meant that if I had to 1v1 solo against someone who was scum on D1, I'd want it to be you That's with all the implied respect and more.In post 527, Isis wrote:i'm confused about whether Pooky is being nice or toxik
It's good to strategically vote people who would be more likely to be recruited but it doesn't ever reduce the likelihood they randed as the initial scum. It's like gravy kicker extra bonus value you get picking someone with good recruit probability that could also be the starter scum. There's no reason you couldn't be the starter scum.In post 529, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i thought you said I was likely to be recruited?
i thought our interactions about kanna felt like something that would be unlikely to come from mafia. but now i don't know if i was mentally assigning more meaning to your posts than was there.In post 521, Isis wrote:drusilla,In post 418, Isis wrote:I didn't know you were townreading me, why did you??
i chose the firebird from the little humpbacked horse as my first choice but i also rambled about nightingales because almost always nightingales would have been my first choice but i had just watched the animated movie as research for my third choice on the list (and then of course the ballet which i always return to and would highly recommend) so i became 'firebird the nightingale'.In post 522, Kanna wrote:btw i chose all my animals based on ms users i liked with animal avatars!
snow leopard was snowblaze, fruit bat was morning tweet, and my third one is going to be DRAGON for iconeum
i hope morning tweet enjoyed those bat gifs!
I mean I could ask you the same thingIn post 533, Isis wrote:It's good to strategically vote people who would be more likely to be recruited but it doesn't ever reduce the likelihood they randed as the initial scum. It's like gravy kicker extra bonus value you get picking someone with good recruit probability that could also be the starter scum. There's no reason you couldn't be the starter scum.
If you were, why didn't you recruit me!?!?
I thought it was at some point during D1?In post 433, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:mafia choose before the game startedIn post 430, PlusJOYED wrote:wait, don't maf recruit only after the first condemnation?
ill townbin this
For me it was some of the combinations you seemed to make which looked like possible contradictions and then your gif with the tiger roaring about scum choosing but more I townread Drusilla and just decided to sheep her. I really didn’t know what I was doing and how to make useful reads in this setup. I actually was thinking of unvoting you but the thread was already locked and I thought I would have more time on D2 but I don’t think I’ll be voting you today and just hope that Isis is actually scum I guess.In post 440, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:imo in a post restricted game you don't want somebody who has low self control and just spam posts a lot. Which I kind of did.In post 436, drusilla wrote:for me what would suggest you're a good choice for me would be the drawing of attention, but i'm not sure i could evaluate why other players would make that decision. i disagree with the last sentence entirely but it feels particularly not useful to discuss.In post 429, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ok and what in my play-history would suggest I am good as a scum-partner ? I'm usually outspoken, brash and draw tons of attention - in a post restricted game such as this one I would think the ideal partner would be someone who is more of a silent hide in the shadows type player.
I was really excited to be a tiger and there were a large number of really cute tiger gifs and apparently thats scummy
I wish no execute or another option was available. I wanted to condemn Tayl0r because I hated those sickly dog gifs.In post 479, Isis wrote:This logic makes sense to me. I am town thoughIn post 476, Kanna wrote:regardless of nomination/flip, i think it's still right to consider pooky town for the second condemn phase because if he was, we would have a better chance pulling down scum if we went with what he wanted
yet if he was scum, he would pull us town but we would already have one scum caught
it's the best chance to get scum ~in some way~
it crossed my mind earlier so either way i think isis was a very good condemn