Mafiascum.net

I think there’s a tendency to believe among newer mafia players and maybe the population in general that the truth will prevail and everything will be okay if I have right on my side, but boy is that not true, as I keep learning the hard way.

In post 523, Rannygazoo wrote: You’re in my scum reads so I don’t feel the need to convince you of anything. Tunnel all you want. You’re not going to help town anyway.

when did you start scumreading redcardinal and why?

The main reason is 463. She can say it’s a joke all she wants, but I was doing some completely harmless digging, not even accusing NPOM of being scum, just exploring their behavior, and for her shut it down like that is scum-motivated. I can iso dive and build a more thorough case.

In post 525, Rannygazoo wrote:I think there’s a tendency to believe among newer mafia players and maybe the population in general that the truth will prevail and everything will be okay if I have right on my side, but boy is that not true, as I keep learning the hard way.

I don't think that's the prevailing thought at all.

@username do you see town motivation in Titus’s posts?

In post 465, Rannygazoo wrote: I don’t decide who I’m going to accuse first and then come up with reasons later.-

Rannygazoo wrote:I can iso dive and build a more thorough case.

lol

VOTE: Rannygazoo

???

In post 529, Rannygazoo wrote:@username do you see town motivation in Titus’s posts?

yes.

Literally wtf. I was telling you what I thought, and I said I can go through the iso and try to improve my case.

You asked me when I to scumread her and why. I could have done the iso dive first (which is normally what people do when making a case against someone), but then it wouldn’t have been an honest answer to your question as you stated it.

In post 521, Noraa wrote:Im still not clear. u have flip flopped so much I don't even know anymore. u scum reading me or no?

sorry about that, no I'm not scumreading you rn

“I don’t decide who I’m going to accuse first and then come up with reasons later.“

Is NOT the same thing as

“I’m incapable of improving my reads by doing a deeper analysis.”

I’m so misunderstood. Woe is me.

So when did you first start scumreading me?

In post 536, Titus wrote:So when did you first start scumreading me?

When you started jesting. I mean, you say not to clutter up the topic with chatter and then you go on to make trolling posts like that. Why did you do that? Further up in your iso, everything looks towny.

In post 537, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 536, Titus wrote:So when did you first start scumreading me?

When you started jesting. I mean, you say not to clutter up the topic with chatter and then you go on to make trolling posts like that. Why did you do that? Further up in your iso, everything looks towny.

Trolling someone =/= clutter. Reactions reveal alignment.

You immediately jumping to scum when I was just being a smartass is not a good look.

I didn’t even vote you because I thought you were scum. It was a pressure vote to get you to straighten up. If I have to say that, it didn’t work, so: UNVOTE:

But you kept at it, and that’s what I don’t get.

In post 539, Rannygazoo wrote:I didn’t even vote you because I thought you were scum. It was a pressure vote to get you to straighten up. If I have to say that, it didn’t work, so: UNVOTE:

But you kept at it, and that’s what I don’t get.

I've bought this argument before but I don't buy it here, from you. Doesn't read as genuine to me

You might be prejudiced tho

You're claiming to have reaction voted a reaction test but didn't see I was obviously trolling?

In post 533, Rannygazoo wrote:Literally wtf. I was telling you what I thought, and I said I can go through the iso and try to improve my case.

You asked me when I

started

to scumread her and why. I could have done the iso dive first (which is normally what people do when making a case against someone), but then it wouldn’t have been an honest answer to your question as you stated it.

In post 535, Rannygazoo wrote:“I don’t decide who I’m going to accuse first and then come up with reasons later.“

Is NOT the same thing as

“I’m incapable of improving my reads by doing a deeper analysis.”

I’m so misunderstood. Woe is me.

*sigh*
I'm inclined to believe this is a townie in hot water cuz the reaction seems somewhat genuine and actually upset/angry. I tend to be biased towards day 1 lims bc 1) no one really reacts well to day 1 pressure and 2) I have actually never seen scum get limmed day 1 except this one time where I was JKer and a dude that was at E-1 claimed JKer so I hammered him.

Also .... don't say woe is me. that just makes u sound dumbbbbbbb(and I mean this in the nicest way possible)

I have seen scum get elimmed day 1 several times, it's not as rare as you're implying. also wow *this* seems genuine to you?

I believe the anger and emotions.

sure its easy to fake but I mean when I'm angry I sound hella fake as well so I'm not one to judge.

I am genuinely frustrated but I’m also out here trying not to take it personally when I get misrepresented, so read as much sarcasm as you need to into my “woe is me”s so it doesn’t sound too dumb.

It’s just a game! We’re having fun! I’m not mad at any of you! It’s probably best if I go cool down for a few hours, though.

Scum can be legit angry.

please use a bit of occam's razor here, if they sound fake it's probably because they are. even if you don't buy that, at least voting ranny will remove a big question mark. I don't want to end up with ranny at the end, do you?