Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 12:45 pm
@Nero Cain
How willing would you be to tag team a wagon on Cheeky.
I think you're wrong about Mini.
How willing would you be to tag team a wagon on Cheeky.
I think you're wrong about Mini.
I want to add my vote to a wagon I feel like seems decent, but there aren't many decent wagons rn (or really many wagons at all). As such I was kinda festering until I decided I'd rather vote something I felt like was shady rather than continue to broil in displeasure. If things continue to feel blah for my intended play I'll actually really drive things but for now I'm still in response mode, I just have my vote out on someone I think is scummy.In post 506, quiet wrote:Gemma also stood out, maybe because of number of posts, maybe because of the “I don’t like how this day is going, I’m not able to play how I wanted” comment which I think is pretty much how I see their day. Maybe you said it and I missed it, but...how do you want to play? Is there a particular reason why BB being BB messes with that? Especially in a game of this size?
I agree
this makes more sense in context, and the point I brought up earlier doesn't cover the issueIn post 513, chkflip wrote:I ISO'd NPOM for funsies and realized his RVS vote was still active. Finding that odd some 400 posts later, I say something about it
and then he straight faced says to me
which is quite literally the opposite ofIn post 407, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Don't see anyone significantly scummy yet.
in a span of less than 10 minutes.In post 410, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Last tiime I played in a game where someone rescinded a claim they were scum.
VOTE: BBMolla
But you don't understand the problem with that?
UNVOTE: MiniMegabyte
VOTE: NoPowerOverMe
An investigation on NPOM.In post 515, Rannygazoo wrote:What might I be asking for?In post 475, Titus wrote:I disagree on that being an RB crumb. I read it as an invest crumb myself if anything at all. Either that or just straight out asking for it.In post 473, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 195, Rannygazoo wrote:NPOM is unreadable. If any investigative role out there wants to check them tonight, don’t let me stop you.
TITUS: This is the post I thought was a RB crumb.
As an RB, he couldn't determine who to block based on their results/target.
helloIn post 505, NorwegianboyEE wrote:heybbmolla heybbmolla heybbmolla
In post 518, chkflip wrote:wym fam I've definitely played with this account before. To the more important point here WHO THE FUCK ELSE ARE YOU!?
If one of them flips scum, both are scum.In post 534, BBmolla wrote:helloIn post 505, NorwegianboyEE wrote:heybbmolla heybbmolla heybbmolla
the Cheeky votes are boring
Is he the worst lurker though?
In post 111, BBmolla wrote:im not a miller but look how much fun we had
In post 538, DrippingGoofball wrote:I kinda like the boring tell after our last game together (Guns and Roses).In post 534, BBmolla wrote:helloIn post 505, NorwegianboyEE wrote:heybbmolla heybbmolla heybbmolla
the Cheeky votes are boring
If one of them flips scum, both are scum.
Elaborate on both. You and Titus are both like "I dislike _name_!" but aren't giving me anything in regards to why.In post 535, Momrangal wrote:I think my vote on DBG is wrong but I don't wanna remove it.
Not liking gamma
and this is pssible TMI. How does he know the alignments of 5 other players? If not why are my reads "bad"?In post 379, BBmolla wrote:nero's bad reads probably make him town tbh
This is scum.In post 546, quiet wrote:Me newbie, I’d guess.
Read over the existing wagons. I like cheaky’s least, and it’s not like we really get anything out of pushing on it if they’re away till the weekend. Save it for later and more posts imo.
Don’t like the mini wagon either.
I do like DGB’s and Joyads a lot more.
Between the two, DGB pinged me more, and I like the people on that wagon more, too. Posting off phone so quoting specifics is proving to be a pain, but I’m happy to elaborate. For now, I’m jumping on board.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DrippingGoofball