Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2021 6:21 am
also i think that writing off pooky as not being scum bc he likes to 1v1 is silly because he can still potentially do that in the 6p
I get it, but you've seen me randomly change my mind as town no?In post 523, Ydrasse wrote:yeah but we don’t see the progression at all you know? it’s hard to take “i’ve been thinking about it” at face value when it could be like yeah nothing there just moving to what’s convenient
(i’m a hypocrite though bc i do this too)
Infinity does not know who No Face is so how would she know? :(In post 508, Infinity 324 wrote:In post 504, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Then y r u voting No Face.In post 501, Infinity 324 wrote:No @norweeIn post 482, Infinity 324 wrote:He's a strong scum player, other than that I have nothingIn post 477, Ydrasse wrote:why no face other than poe?
This is a realization I had in real time that I'm weighting more heavily than you think probably?In post 488, Infinity 324 wrote:Tbh I can see it. Jingle in the hood talked about how his most recent 2 games were scumgames, and he could be having a weaker game. If I was a strong scum player having a weaker game I'd definitely put myself in the 3p hood, and scum!skitt would definitely not be having a weaker game here.
???In post 527, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I think you should consider the current slots in the 3P group.
If any of Skitter/Bingle was put into the group as town VS scum!Vanderscamp or scum!Ydrasse they would likely get destroyed. So that means it is the scum strategy we need to look at. And that is that ballsy scum is in 3P and a endgaming scum is in 6P. And Ydrasse/Vanderscamp are both slots i could see being set up as potentially endgaming scum.
I think you're town independently Ydrasse, but i'm just saying that Infinity's reasoning for ruling you and Vanderscamp out as scum based on being in the 6P group is flawed.In post 530, Ydrasse wrote:???In post 527, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I think you should consider the current slots in the 3P group.
If any of Skitter/Bingle was put into the group as town VS scum!Vanderscamp or scum!Ydrasse they would likely get destroyed. So that means it is the scum strategy we need to look at. And that is that ballsy scum is in 3P and a endgaming scum is in 6P. And Ydrasse/Vanderscamp are both slots i could see being set up as potentially endgaming scum.
have you ever played with scum!me? what?
The thing is, it's way less risky for scum if that happens. If necessary, scum can put 1 or 2 limbaity players in the 3p group so that vander/ydrasse doesn't get destroyedIn post 527, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I think you should consider the current slots in the 3P group.
If any of Skitter/Bingle was put into the group as town VS scum!Vanderscamp or scum!Ydrasse they would likely get destroyed.
Yes, which is precisely why Vander/Ydrasse would only be scum in 3P group if the 3P group had much more limbaity players rather than the consesus "strong" players.In post 532, Infinity 324 wrote:The thing is, it's way less risky for scum if that happens. If necessary, scum can put 1 or 2 limbaity players in the 3p group so that vander/ydrasse doesn't get destroyedIn post 527, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I think you should consider the current slots in the 3P group.
If any of Skitter/Bingle was put into the group as town VS scum!Vanderscamp or scum!Ydrasse they would likely get destroyed.
You strike me as a player that would be really good at going undercover as scum and pocketing town.In post 534, Ydrasse wrote:i’m asking more why you think i would be the end gaming one
I think it's unlikely is what I'm saying. The hood distribution depends on what the scumteam is obviously, so certain hood distributions will make certain players more or less likely to be scumIn post 536, NorwegianboyEE wrote:But Ydrasse/Vanderscamp could still theoretically have rolled scum in a world with the current 3p hood.
I'm not really sure people's scum playstyles divide like this, but I think hectic is actually the most likely to be scum if this was the strategyIn post 541, NorwegianboyEE wrote:My theory is that the hood distribution proves we have a ballsy player that wants to take on the big league and prove themselves in the small hood, and a more clever deepwolf that will be trying to sound town, harmless, and pocket town in the bigger hood.
Small hood is for the powerful bruiser, big hood for the long-living wolf.
All mafia game solves should be cinematically pleasing and make for a ending of a good detective show episode where the detective explains the scum teams strategy and perfectly exposes them though.In post 542, Infinity 324 wrote:I'm not really sure people's scum playstyles divide like this
Tinfoil says this could be a scum slip.In post 513, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Because Bingle wants to tryhard?
Idk him very well, but i think he likes a challenge.
I guess I didn't make sure enough?In post 479, Infinity 324 wrote:Making sure this doesn't get missedIn post 421, Infinity 324 wrote:I was thinking that the 6p hood could vote on someone for the 3p hood to pledge our votes to. If the chosen player is scum, they weren't getting limmed anyway, so it should increase our chances to hit scum. I think I'd rather that than try to read into scum!skitt/scum!jingle associatives. If people want to exclude me from that that's actually ideal for me, scum!me isn't great at coming up with reasons not to vote my partners.